Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Back Again: Will These Tests Be Good Enough To Point To Celiac Or Not?


VitaminDGirl

Recommended Posts

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

So I did a saliva test some weeks ago that showed I am off the charts positive on this test: Gliadin Ab, SIgA (Saliva). (Borderline is 13-15 and I was 62!)~ Dr. said he calls this a "gluten allergy".

Sooooo yes, I will come off gluten, but I am still interested in learning if I am celiac or not so have remained on for now.

Today the dr. ordered these blood tests:

IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase AND

IgA Anti-endomysium antibodies.

Will the above results be accurate enough to indicate celiac or not?

AND in case he decides to do an internal biopsy (and I accept) is it ok to be off gluten, or do I need to stay on it until that test is done as well?

Thanks.

Vitamin D Girl. :P


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes you do need to keep eating gluten until the biopsy is done. After the biopsy you can start a diet trial. False negatives are not uncommon with both blood and biopsy so do the trial even if the test results are negative.

Your doctor should also have ordered a total IGA and there are a couple of other tests that can be done but I can't think of the names of them right now, someone else will know and answer though and hopefully tell you them. If you total IGA is low that will cause a false negative on the IGA tests.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Yes you do need to keep eating gluten until the biopsy is done. After the biopsy you can start a diet trial. False negatives are not uncommon with both blood and biopsy so do the trial even if the test results are negative.

Your doctor should also have ordered a total IGA and there are a couple of other tests that can be done but I can't think of the names of them right now, someone else will know and answer though and hopefully tell you them. If you total IGA is low that will cause a false negative on the IGA tests.

Thank you for your response.

I am not sure I quite understand all the testing.

I guess I"m fearing I've not ordered enough or the right tests (by my dr).

I mean, if these tests come back positive, it then means I probably have celiac, and only a biopsy could confirm?

But if it's negative, I may still have celiac and should get a biopsy?

If I know my antibodies are high already, would it have been better to just get the genetic celiac test? I mean, b/c if that was positive, chances are I have celiac with such high gluten antibodies, right?

Or maybe not.

I've been trying to research all of this, but am still left a bit confused. :unsure:

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

ps how many posts do we have to make before we don't have to go through the approval by the moderator anymore? Or are everyone's comments always moderated?

Just wondering. :P

nora-n Rookie

Hi I do not know anything about that, and my posts show up right away.

About the total IgA, here in Europe they automatically do that if they order the IgA celiac tests in most places.

Jestgar Rising Star

If I know my antibodies are high already, would it have been better to just get the genetic celiac test? I mean, b/c if that was positive, chances are I have celiac with such high gluten antibodies, right?

There is no clearly defined "celiac gene". The genetic tests show associated genes only, so, no, the genetic test will not tell you if you have celiac disease.

Jestgar Rising Star

ps how many posts do we have to make before we don't have to go through the approval by the moderator anymore? Or are everyone's comments always moderated?

Just wondering. :P

You're close. :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gardening Apprentice

The celiac panel our local lab ran included:

anti-gliadin IGG

anti-gliadin IGA

TTG IGG

TTG IGA

anti-endomysial IGA

total IGA

Aside from total IGG, I can't think of anything else that could be included, and I thought it was pretty thorough.

You do need a total IGA, because if you don't make enough IGA in general, you can't make a high enough anti-gliadin IGA (or TTG, etc) to register as positive. Therefore, it could give you a false negative.

nora-n Rookie

Note that the EMA test is only IgA, since this is not an automated test.

they take a piece of monkey esophagus and incubate with the blood test, and look in an electronic microscope for flourescence which is caused by IgA.

There is no IgG version of that test.

Sometimes medical papers mention endomysium IgA and IgG, but obviously they then mean the ttg test.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

"Today the dr. ordered these blood tests:

IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase AND

IgA Anti-endomysium antibodies."

Okkk....I'm still a bit confused.

The dr. ordered the above tests.

If they are positive, I should for sure do the biopsy and it will show me if I have celiac?

And if the biopsy is negative, does it mean I"m not celiac?

And if the above tests are negative, do I order additional bloodwork of some sort?

If the biopsy is positive, but the tests above are negative, I have celiac?

Someone told me that getting the blood test to see if you carry the gene (which one of you said really doesn't do that?)... if positive means you probably will get it sometime in your life. If negative, I can't have it?

I hope my questions aren't too confusing and someone can help me out.

Thanks.

nora-n Rookie

These two tests are considered the most specifi tests for celiac nowadays, but recently the new deamidated gliadin test has been introduced several places and it is considered a bit better than the ttg test.

The endomysium test is the most specific one for celiac.

Note there are lots of false negatives, and the cutoffs are set very high as the doctor do not want any, ANY, false positives....so you might still be celiac despite of negative tests.

Or, you could still turn positive in the future.

these tests are really dependent on tissue damage, not just antibodies to gliadin like the antigliadin test.

most people with the gene will not develop celiac, as the gene is very common, like 30% or so of the population.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

These two tests are considered the most specifi tests for celiac nowadays, but recently the new deamidated gliadin test has been introduced several places and it is considered a bit better than the ttg test.

The endomysium test is the most specific one for celiac.

Note there are lots of false negatives, and the cutoffs are set very high as the doctor do not want any, ANY, false positives....so you might still be celiac despite of negative tests.

Or, you could still turn positive in the future.

these tests are really dependent on tissue damage, not just antibodies to gliadin like the antigliadin test.

most people with the gene will not develop celiac, as the gene is very common, like 30% or so of the population.

Ok, thanks for all of that. Very helpful!

I did the gliadin test by saliva and I was very high.

Supposedly my bloodwork above is 'in' now. I'm waiting for the dr's office to call with results. If they don't I plan to go pick them up from the lab myself tonight.

Stay tuned, and thanks again for all of the 'newbie' support! Much appreciated. :D

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Ok, thanks for all of that. Very helpful!

I did the gliadin test by saliva and I was very high.

Supposedly my bloodwork above is 'in' now. I'm waiting for the dr's office to call with results. If they don't I plan to go pick them up from the lab myself tonight.

Stay tuned, and thanks again for all of the 'newbie' support! Much appreciated. :D

Ok, so they just called and I'm negative on the bloodwork. So, the odds are equal still that I could be celiac even with negative bloodwork?

Is the biopsy the only other way to find out?

Or should I ask for other kinds of blood tests?

Thanks in advance.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Ok, so they just called and I'm negative on the bloodwork. So, the odds are equal still that I could be celiac even with negative bloodwork?

Is the biopsy the only other way to find out?

Or should I ask for other kinds of blood tests?

Thanks in advance.

Yes you could still be celiac. The choice to biopsy is up to you but be aware that may come back a false negative also. If you are going to biopsy then stay on gluten until that is done. If your not going to biopsy then go ahead and get started on a strict trial of the diet. Your body know the answer.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Do you have any idea of any research (or just from being on these boards) how often someone with negative blood results of IgA Anti-tissue transglutaminase ad IgA Anti-endomysium comes back with a positive internal biopsy?

Is it very common?

Thanks for any leads you can give. You all are such a blessing to me! :D

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

PS would there be any other blood tests I could do before a biopsy that may give more ideas about if I have celiac?

Like is IgG testing what some follow-up with?

Thanks.

nora-n Rookie

Officially, 20% of biopsy-proven celiacs with villous atropy have negative bloodwork, and partial villous atrophy, patchy celiac, about half are negative.

VitaminDGirl Apprentice

Officially, 20% of biopsy-proven celiacs with villous atropy have negative bloodwork, and partial villous atrophy, patchy celiac, about half are negative.

THank you again. Those numbers are bigger than I thought. I think I will try and have the biopsy done.

<_<

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Florence Lillian replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      11

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - catnapt replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

    3. - cristiana replied to hjayne19's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      21

      Insomnia help

    4. - SilkieFairy replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

    5. - Lkg5 replied to Matthias's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Unexpected gluten exposure risk from cultivated mushrooms

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,353
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ace14219
    Newest Member
    ace14219
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Florence Lillian
      Hi Jane: You may want to try the D3 I now take. I have reactions to fillers and many additives. Sports Research, it is based in the USA and I have had no bad reactions with this brand. The D3 does have coconut oil but it is non GMO, it is Gluten free, Soy free, Soybean free and Safflower oil free.  I have a cupboard full of supplements that did not agree with me -  I just keep trying and have finally settled on Sports Research. I take NAKA Women's Multi full spectrum, and have not felt sick after taking 2 capsules per day -  it is a Canadian company. I buy both from Amazon. I wish you well in your searching, I know how discouraging it all is. Florence.  
    • catnapt
      highly unlikely  NOTHING and I mean NOTHING else has ever caused me these kinds of symptoms I have no problem with dates, they are a large part of my diet In fact, I eat a very high fiber, very high vegetable and bean diet and have for many years now. It's considered a whole foods plant based or plant forward diet (I do now eat some lean ground turkey but not much) I was off dairy for years but recently had to add back plain yogurt to meet calcium needs that I am not allowed to get from supplements (I have not had any problem with the yogurt)   I eat almost no processed foods. I don't eat out. almost everything I eat, I cook myself I am going to keep a food diary but to be honest, I already know that it's wheat products and also barley that are the problem, which is why I gradually stopped eating and buying them. When I was eating them, like back in early 2024, when I was in the middle of moving and ate out (always had bread or toast or rolls or a sub or pizza) I felt terrible but at that time was so busy and exhausted that I never stopped to think it was the food. Once I was in my new place, I continued to have bread from time to time and had such horrible joint pain that I was preparing for 2 total knee replacements as well as one hip! The surgery could not go forward as I was (and still am) actively losing calcium from my bones. That problem has yet to be properly diagnosed and treated   anyway over time I realized that I felt better when I stopped eating bread. Back at least 3 yrs ago I noticed that regular pasta made me sick so I switched to brown rice pasta and even though it costs a lot more, I really like it.   so gradually I just stopped buying and eating foods with gluten. I stopped getting raisin bran when I was constipated because it made me bloated and it didn't help the constipation any more (used to be a sure bet that it would in the past)   I made cookies and brownies using beans and rolled oats and dates and tahini and I LOVE them and have zero issues eating those I eat 1 or more cans of beans per day easily can eat a pound of broccoli - no problem! Brussels sprouts the same thing.   so yeh it's bread and related foods that are clearly the problem  there is zero doubt in my mind    
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @nanny marley It is interesting what you say about 'It's OK not to sleep'. Worrying about sleeping only makes it much harder to sleep.  One of my relatives is an insomniac and I am sure that is part of the problem.  Whereas I once had a neighbour who, if she couldn't sleep, would simply get up again, make a cup of tea, read, do a sudoku or some other small task, and then go back to bed when she felt sleepy again.  I can't think it did her any harm - she lived  well into her nineties. Last week I decided to try a Floradix Magnesium supplement which seems to be helping me to sleep better.  It is a liquid magnesium supplement, so easy to take.  It is gluten free (unlike the Floradix iron supplement).  Might be worth a try.        
    • SilkieFairy
      It could be a fructan intolerance? How do you do with dates?  https://www.dietvsdisease.org/sorry-your-gluten-sensitivity-is-actually-a-fructan-intolerance/
    • Lkg5
      Thank’s for addressing the issue of mushrooms.  I was under the impression that only wild mushrooms were gluten-free.  Have been avoiding cultivated mushrooms for years. Also, the issue of smoked food was informative.  In France last year, where there is hardly any prepared take-out food that is gluten-free, I tried smoked chicken.  Major mistake!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.