Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lactose Intolerance And Nonceliac Gluten Intol?


ar8

Recommended Posts

ar8 Apprentice

I have noticed that I feel much less bloated and gassy when I drink lactose free milk along with cutting out gluten. This is a new discovery as I was trying to figure out why I'd still have no appetite and bloat even though I cut out gluten. So I bought lactaid on a whim and feel better. I thought for a bit "oh joy! maybe I juse have lactose issues!" and ate lactose free, but added gluten back-- and didn't feel good, so it's back to gluten free, lactose free. I don't have celiac disease, or at least I didn't two years ago, the last time I was biopsied for it. My question has to do with the tandem nature of these two-- I had thought that lactose intolerance was only a typical symptom for CELIAC, but not non-celiac gluten intol, because in the former the enzymes at the tips of your villi are destroyed, whereas in the latter there isn't actual destruction of the villi, so lactose digestion should be fine?

I have no history of lactose intol in my family. Or even digestive disorders. I'm the oddball with all of my gas and bloat.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jststric Contributor

I have noticed that I feel much less bloated and gassy when I drink lactose free milk along with cutting out gluten. This is a new discovery as I was trying to figure out why I'd still have no appetite and bloat even though I cut out gluten. So I bought lactaid on a whim and feel better. I thought for a bit "oh joy! maybe I juse have lactose issues!" and ate lactose free, but added gluten back-- and didn't feel good, so it's back to gluten free, lactose free. I don't have celiac disease, or at least I didn't two years ago, the last time I was biopsied for it. My question has to do with the tandem nature of these two-- I had thought that lactose intolerance was only a typical symptom for CELIAC, but not non-celiac gluten intol, because in the former the enzymes at the tips of your villi are destroyed, whereas in the latter there isn't actual destruction of the villi, so lactose digestion should be fine?

I have no history of lactose intol in my family. Or even digestive disorders. I'm the oddball with all of my gas and bloat.

Well, welcome to the club. I have read that some people here that are lactose intolerant CAN do the Lactaid milk and others CAN'T. I happen to be one that can. But I can't seem to do any other lactose-free thing. Go figure. You MAY consider something else being a problem for you too! After I got done eliminating things in my diet one by one and then adding them back in, I found I was intolerant of MANY things. Besides glutens and dairy....eggs, nuts, beans and rice. You might look at your diet and see if there's anything else you eat on a regular basis and try eliminating it just to see if you aren't blaming the wrong thing.

tarnalberry Community Regular

lactose intolerance is fairly common in many populations, regardless of gluten tolerance. it's a relatively recent genetic mutation that allows some people to digest lactose past the age of weaning and is common primarily in European backgrounds.

ar8 Apprentice

lactose intolerance is fairly common in many populations, regardless of gluten tolerance. it's a relatively recent genetic mutation that allows some people to digest lactose past the age of weaning and is common primarily in European backgrounds.

Thanks for the replies! Yes, I know that in fact lactose intol. is far more common in the world as a whole than lactose tolerance, but I am caucasian and never had issues with lactose before all of this gluten stuff became a problem. Just thought it was strange that I wouldn't actually have Celiac yet have compromised lactase enzyme activity. I've also heard that primary lactose intol is obvious by late childhood. I had an iron stomach and ate pretty much anything until age 23 when all heck broke loose!

HMM, yeah, and thanks for the suggestion...to continue looking at other things I eat on a regular basis. If only my diet didn't include so MANY things this would be easier!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.