Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Here Need Help


mylilcappi

Recommended Posts

mylilcappi Newbie

hi,

i have just been dx barring an biopsy.

i am wondering about so many things, but right now i am wondering about vitamin e. i want to take fish oil, and i have been using Carlson's fish oil liquid. But it has vitamin e in it. Aren't we supposed to stay away from vitamin e? tocepherols?

Thanks very much,

mamie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eatmeat4good Enthusiast

Actually E is one of the vitamins Celiacs are often deficient in.

The only reason to avoid E would be if you are intolerant of Soy.

There is non-soy derived vitamin E but many Vitamin E's are Soy cause it is cheap I think.

I think what you may be referring to is if E is derived from wheat germ.

In the US, it would have to be labeled as containing wheat if that were the case.

mylilcappi Newbie

Actually E is one of the vitamins Celiacs are often deficient in.

The only reason to avoid E would be if you are intolerant of Soy.

There is non-soy derived vitamin E but many Vitamin E's are Soy cause it is cheap I think.

I think what you may be referring to is if E is derived from wheat germ.

In the US, it would have to be labeled as containing wheat if that were the case.

thank you.

So you are basically saying that in the U. S. if Vitamin E were on the label, then it would have to be labeled as coming for "wheat". like for instance, i just drank some oj that has a little vitamin e in it. But it just states vitamin e. So it should have said derived from wheat?

i'm still learning, and so confused about many things..

Mamie

shopgirl Contributor

No, in the U.S., if it is derived from wheat, then it must clearly be labeled. If it isn't labeled as deriving from wheat, then it doesn't contain wheat. If it just says topcopherols or Vitamin E, it's fine.

In the U.S., wheat must be labeled on the package.

mylilcappi Newbie

Thank you.

Mamie

ravenwoodglass Mentor

thank you.

So you are basically saying that in the U. S. if Vitamin E were on the label, then it would have to be labeled as coming for "wheat". like for instance, i just drank some oj that has a little vitamin e in it. But it just states vitamin e. So it should have said derived from wheat?

i'm still learning, and so confused about many things..

Mamie

In the case of orange juice I do think it would have to say derived from wheat. In vitamins and supplements however the labeling laws are different. In the case of supplements it is best to call the maker and ask.

FarmCat Newbie

I'd like to clear up a misconception I commonly see on these boards. The US laws that require food manufacturers to clearly label allergens DO NOT APPLY to vitamins or to medications. If your vitamins or meds say 'starch', it could be wheat starch. I Googled this and found the following sources:

Open Original Shared Link

Since the Food Allergy Labeling Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) does not apply to medications, drug companies are not required to put allergy warnings on their labels. The lack of an allergy warning doesn't guarantee a lack of allergens in a medication.

Open Original Shared Link

The Food Allergen Labeling Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) was passed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006 to require manufacturers to identify the use of the top eight allergens. These allergens are eggs, dairy, soy, tree nuts, peanuts, fish, shellfish, and wheat. Unfortunately, vitamins fall under the category of


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,213
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MogwaiStripe
    Newest Member
    MogwaiStripe
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.