Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Bone Marrow Issue


tohobo

Recommended Posts

tohobo Newbie

Hi all,

To last off, I was diagnosed with Celiac by tTG and biopsy (Marsh 3B) in 2009.

Last year I had some blood work done that showed very mild anemia for a few months. My doctor ran an absolute retic count which came back low as 15 (ref range 25 - 80). She ran it again in the future, with the same low results. Due to my red blood cells floating around low-normal, she decided it was likely just normal for me.

Recently at my annual checkup, she reran the tests. My results are below. She told me that my reticulocytes are almost none existent. Even though my HB, HCT &RBC are only mildly low, they are still lower than normal and my retic should be higher to make up for it. She has referred me urgently to a Hematologist and requested I am seen before June. The only symptom I have is I have been really tired the last few months and I've lost 10lbs over last two months without trying. I am a slender 25 year old male, so the 10lbs should of been hard to lose. I am not too worried, but just wondered if everyone thinks my GP is right is requesting a BMB. SHe feels even though my B12 is low, it would have to be lower to be causing a retic of almost 0. Also she said normally B12 anemia shows as Macrocytic, while mine was normocytic which usually points to a bone marrow problems.

Does anybody have experience with this? THanks a million!!

Hemoglobin: 120 (range 140 - 170) LOW

Hematocrit: 0.34 (range 0.39 - 0.49) LOW

RBC: 3.9 (range 4.4 - 5.7) LOW

MCV: 86 (range 80 - 97)

MCH: 30 (range 27 - 32)

MCHC: 349 (range 320 - 360)

RDW: 12.7 (range 11.5 - 15.5)

Platelets: 177 (range 150 - 400)

MPV: 8.6 (range 7.4 - 11.3)

WBC: 3.8 (range 4.2 - 11.0) LOW

ABS Neutrophils: 2.24 (range 1.8 - 7.0)

ABS Lymphocytes: 0.9 (range 1.0 - 3.0) LOW

ABS Monocytes: 0.34 (range 0.0 - 0.80)

ABS Eosinophils: 0.23 (range 0.0 - 0.40)

ABS Basophils: 0.04 (range 0.0 - 0.20)

ABS Reticulocytes: 1 (range 25 - 80) VERY LOW

INR: 1.2 (range 0.8 - 1.2)

B12: 174 (Deficiency < 148, Insufficiency 148 - 220, Normal > 220) LOWISH

Ferritin: 54 (range 20 - 200)

Bilirubin Total: 4 (range < 23)

Albumin: 44 (range 34 - 48)

Alkaline Phos: 41 (range 40 - 130)

ALT: 28 (range < 46)

LDH: 160 (range 110 - 215)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I can't answer about anything other than your B12. That seems to be quite low. Are you taking a sublingual B12? If you're not you should pick some up. I was very symptomatic when mine was that low and some doctors treat low B12 when it is under 500. It isn't going to hurt to supplement.

tohobo Newbie

Thanks for the info on B12. My GP said my B12 is low, but not dangerous yet so shots are not needed. I have been taking a sublingual tablet for the last year. My GP said to continue that until I see the hematologist. So we will see I guess, thanks again! :-)

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thanks for the info on B12. My GP said my B12 is low, but not dangerous yet so shots are not needed. I have been taking a sublingual tablet for the last year. My GP said to continue that until I see the hematologist. So we will see I guess, thanks again! :-)

I hope the hematologist is able to figure things out for you. Let us know how things go at the visit.

Loey Rising Star

Hi all,

To last off, I was diagnosed with Celiac by tTG and biopsy (Marsh 3B) in 2009.

Last year I had some blood work done that showed very mild anemia for a few months. My doctor ran an absolute retic count which came back low as 15 (ref range 25 - 80). She ran it again in the future, with the same low results. Due to my red blood cells floating around low-normal, she decided it was likely just normal for me.

Recently at my annual checkup, she reran the tests. My results are below. She told me that my reticulocytes are almost none existent. Even though my HB, HCT &RBC are only mildly low, they are still lower than normal and my retic should be higher to make up for it. She has referred me urgently to a Hematologist and requested I am seen before June. The only symptom I have is I have been really tired the last few months and I've lost 10lbs over last two months without trying. I am a slender 25 year old male, so the 10lbs should of been hard to lose. I am not too worried, but just wondered if everyone thinks my GP is right is requesting a BMB. SHe feels even though my B12 is low, it would have to be lower to be causing a retic of almost 0. Also she said normally B12 anemia shows as Macrocytic, while mine was normocytic which usually points to a bone marrow problems.

Does anybody have experience with this? THanks a million!!

Hemoglobin: 120 (range 140 - 170) LOW

Hematocrit: 0.34 (range 0.39 - 0.49) LOW

RBC: 3.9 (range 4.4 - 5.7) LOW

MCV: 86 (range 80 - 97)

MCH: 30 (range 27 - 32)

MCHC: 349 (range 320 - 360)

RDW: 12.7 (range 11.5 - 15.5)

Platelets: 177 (range 150 - 400)

MPV: 8.6 (range 7.4 - 11.3)

WBC: 3.8 (range 4.2 - 11.0) LOW

ABS Neutrophils: 2.24 (range 1.8 - 7.0)

ABS Lymphocytes: 0.9 (range 1.0 - 3.0) LOW

ABS Monocytes: 0.34 (range 0.0 - 0.80)

ABS Eosinophils: 0.23 (range 0.0 - 0.40)

ABS Basophils: 0.04 (range 0.0 - 0.20)

ABS Reticulocytes: 1 (range 25 - 80) VERY LOW

INR: 1.2 (range 0.8 - 1.2)

B12: 174 (Deficiency < 148, Insufficiency 148 - 220, Normal > 220) LOWISH

Ferritin: 54 (range 20 - 200)

Bilirubin Total: 4 (range < 23)

Albumin: 44 (range 34 - 48)

Alkaline Phos: 41 (range 40 - 130)

ALT: 28 (range < 46)

LDH: 160 (range 110 - 215)

I was recently diagnosed with CLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia) and I'm happy to say that none of your numbers are in my range. Did your doctor do a bone marrow aspiration? Mine doesn't do anything invasive until I need chemo/radiation. Please feel free to PM me if you want to talk or need to vent. Also I recommend going to the cancer society website. They have a wealth of information.

My prayers are with you and I'm sending positive energy.

Loey

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,675
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kimmber
    Newest Member
    Kimmber
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.