Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Waiting (Not So) Patiently For Results


kameelham

Recommended Posts

kameelham Newbie

Hello Celiac experts! I've started on the path of diagnosis and while i wait for the results of what I hope is my last test I was hoping you all could give me your expert opinions.

A little over a month ago I was having severe pain in my esophagus so I went to my primary doctor. She wasn't sure about the cause but was concerned so I was sent to a GI and ordered a series of blood tests one of which was for Celiac. The GI suspected an esophagus ulcer caused my one of my medications and we proceded with an endoscopy just to be sure. He was right, there was a large ulcer, he also told me after the procedure that he noticed my small intestins looked "grainy" and he had taken biopsies to test for Celiac. I didn't think much of it until the next week when my doctors office called to tell me that my blood work levels had come back high, but not definitive (not sure exactly which test this was) and recommended I follow up with the GI. Well, I thankfully had already had a biopsy done, so i figured I'd just wait to hear what that said. Two weeks went by with no news so I called the GI who then told me that the biopsy was negative, but he had just seen the blood test results and wanted to do more blood work and a genealogy test. A few weeks later GI says I have the genetic markers present and slightly higher levels then before on the blood work (again, not sure which test this was). My doctor seemed to think that I had a false negative on the biopsy and that most likely I do indeed have Celiac, however before giving me an official diagnosis he wanted to do a capsule endoscopy! So, that happened a week ago and I am now waiting for a call on those results.

I've never thought about Celiac until now and I have to say the more I read about the symptoms the more sense it seems to make. I've had bloating, gas, fatigue, skin problems, anxiety, knee aches, migraines, and a history of stomach problems, including cyclical vomiting (though I haven't found anything linking the two) with no real solution.

My question to you is, does this seem consistant with the false negatives and sometimes non-clear cut diagnosis of Celiac?

Thanks for any thoughts you may have! I'm new to this and trying to gather as much information as possible.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Welcome. You don't need to wait on those results to start the diet. You had a positive blood test so you need the diet no matter what the endoscopic test shows. False negatives are common with both blood and biopsy but not false positives. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to.

sa1937 Community Regular

Hello Celiac experts! I've started on the path of diagnosis and while i wait for the results of what I hope is my last test I was hoping you all could give me your expert opinions.

A little over a month ago I was having severe pain in my esophagus so I went to my primary doctor. She wasn't sure about the cause but was concerned so I was sent to a GI and ordered a series of blood tests one of which was for Celiac. The GI suspected an esophagus ulcer caused my one of my medications and we proceded with an endoscopy just to be sure. He was right, there was a large ulcer, he also told me after the procedure that he noticed my small intestins looked "grainy" and he had taken biopsies to test for Celiac. I didn't think much of it until the next week when my doctors office called to tell me that my blood work levels had come back high, but not definitive (not sure exactly which test this was) and recommended I follow up with the GI. Well, I thankfully had already had a biopsy done, so i figured I'd just wait to hear what that said. Two weeks went by with no news so I called the GI who then told me that the biopsy was negative, but he had just seen the blood test results and wanted to do more blood work and a genealogy test. A few weeks later GI says I have the genetic markers present and slightly higher levels then before on the blood work (again, not sure which test this was). My doctor seemed to think that I had a false negative on the biopsy and that most likely I do indeed have Celiac, however before giving me an official diagnosis he wanted to do a capsule endoscopy! So, that happened a week ago and I am now waiting for a call on those results.

I've never thought about Celiac until now and I have to say the more I read about the symptoms the more sense it seems to make. I've had bloating, gas, fatigue, skin problems, anxiety, knee aches, migraines, and a history of stomach problems, including cyclical vomiting (though I haven't found anything linking the two) with no real solution.

My question to you is, does this seem consistant with the false negatives and sometimes non-clear cut diagnosis of Celiac?

Thanks for any thoughts you may have! I'm new to this and trying to gather as much information as possible.

It's entirely possible that you have celiac. False negatives on either the blood test or biopsy are not uncommon. If your celiac panel came back high, I would say that's a positive...not sure why your doctor would say that's not definitive. As far as the biopsy is concerned, if damage is patchy and samples are taken in areas not damaged, it could early be interpreted as negative (and might be a false negative).

Make sure you pick up copies of all of these tests! The celiac panel always has a reference range, which varies from lab to lab. When you get a copy of that, post your results here and someone can help you interpret them.

Also, get a copy of your biopsy results...a pathologist has to examine those biopsies as damage is not usually visible to the naked eye.

It sounds like your doctor is being very thorough to find out what is causing your problems. When all celiac testing is done, you should give a gluten-free diet a strict try as you may find you do indeed have problems even if tests are inconclusive.

kameelham Newbie

So the doctor called back today with my capsule study results. He found some erosion farther down on in my intestines then the initial endoscopy went that is consistent with Celiac and gave me the options of going ahead and starting the diet or coming back in for a longer scope and more biopsies. I told him about my research the symptoms that I have had that seem to be related and he agreed that going gluten free and coming back for a follow up in the fall seemed to make the most sense as there was always the chance that more biopsies could still bring more false negatives.

I'm really thankful I was refereed to a doctor who seems to be so knowledgeable about Celiac. I'm feeling a little overwhelmed at starting the diet as it's now going to be a reality. I'll definitely be reading/posting here with questions!

kareng Grand Master

So the doctor called back today with my capsule study results. He found some erosion farther down on in my intestines then the initial endoscopy went that is consistent with Celiac and gave me the options of going ahead and starting the diet or coming back in for a longer scope and more biopsies. I told him about my research the symptoms that I have had that seem to be related and he agreed that going gluten free and coming back for a follow up in the fall seemed to make the most sense as there was always the chance that more biopsies could still bring more false negatives.

I'm really thankful I was refereed to a doctor who seems to be so knowledgeable about Celiac. I'm feeling a little overwhelmed at starting the diet as it's now going to be a reality. I'll definitely be reading/posting here with questions!

Nice to hear a good doctor story!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,836
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Womanofsubstance
    Newest Member
    Womanofsubstance
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      if you have already learned that Gluten is the cause of your symptoms, of course there is no need to add it back into your diet— your decision could save you a lot of needless suffering. One thing to consider is that if you do have celiac disease, your first- degree relatives may also need to get screened for it, because, like diabetes the disease is genetic, although many of its triggers seem to be environmental factors. You may want to consider getting a genetic test for celiac disease, so you can at least warn your relatives if it turns out that you do carry a celiac gene.
    • lookingforanswersone
      Thanks everyone. I've decided to do a gluten challenge (4 slices of bread a day for 3 months) and then do a full gluten panel of all the tests that can be done, just to rule it in or out for sure. I think otherwise psychologically it will keep bothering me 
    • Suze046
      Thanks Scott. Those articles are really interesting. I’m cutting out gluten for 6 weeks but honestly I’m not sure I even want to reintroduce it! I ate at a restaurant for the first time on Wednesday and then Thursday was really uncomfortable and had a few trips to the loo.. wonder if there was some cross contamination 🤷‍♀️ if that’s how my body reacts after not eating it for 3 weeks I’m not sure it’s worth reintroducing it and re testing for celiac! It might have been a coincidence I realise that I’m not going to feel better all of a sudden and my gut is probably still trying to heal. Thanks for your supportive message! 
    • RMJ
      Reference range 0.00 to 10.00 means that within that range is normal, so not celiac. There are other antibodies that can be present in celiac disease and they don’t all have to be positive to have celiac.  I’m sure someone else will post a link to an article describing them! Plus, if you are IgA deficient the celiac IgA tests won’t be accurate.
    • cristiana
      Great to have another UK person on the forum!   Re: blood tests, it sounds as if you are being well monitored but if you have any further concerns about blood tests or anything else, do not hesitate to start a new thread. Cristiana  
×
×
  • Create New...