Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Return To Normal = Celiac?


Thea-Bug

Recommended Posts

Thea-Bug Newbie

Hi all,

Long time lurker, first post here :) I'm confused about my results & haven't heard back from my GI, who's usually slow about getting back - I just have a copy of the lab results in the mail. My TTG IGA was very high several months ago. I then went gluten-free. I didn't do the biopsy because I was undergoing another surgery at the time and decided not to (I realize the time has passed now that I'm gluten-free). I have been gluten-free now for a while. I had a repeat blood test last week and the TTG IGA is now completely normal (under 1 in fact!).

At my follow up, before the GI drew the blood, she said that my positive response to the gluten free diet, plus the TTG IGA, may indicate celiac. She said that the follow up blood test would confirm celiac for sure.

My question is this: does this make sense that the follow up blood test would confirm? I get that the false negative rate for the TTG IGA is very low, and is only for a few other conditions like autoimmune stuff and liver failure. So does the fact that it went down to practically zero over the course of several months mean for sure that it's celiac? That would make sense to me, because if it was something else in the first place (e.g. liver failure), a gluten-free diet shouldn't affect that number. But of course, then there's the fact that the biopsy is supposed to be the gold standard. So I guess that's where I'm confused. Isn't TTG IGA a measurement of ACTUAL REPAIR GOING ON TO THE INTESTINES in the first place? Right? Isn't that the body's immune response to damage in the intestines? Or do I have that wrong?

So confused right now! ;)

Thanks in advance!

Thea


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

Hi all,

Long time lurker, first post here :) I'm confused about my results & haven't heard back from my GI, who's usually slow about getting back - I just have a copy of the lab results in the mail. My TTG IGA was very high several months ago. I then went gluten-free. I didn't do the biopsy because I was undergoing another surgery at the time and decided not to (I realize the time has passed now that I'm gluten-free). I have been gluten-free now for a while. I had a repeat blood test last week and the TTG IGA is now completely normal (under 1 in fact!).

At my follow up, before the GI drew the blood, she said that my positive response to the gluten free diet, plus the TTG IGA, may indicate celiac. She said that the follow up blood test would confirm celiac for sure.

My question is this: does this make sense that the follow up blood test would confirm? I get that the false negative rate for the TTG IGA is very low, and is only for a few other conditions like autoimmune stuff and liver failure. So does the fact that it went down to practically zero over the course of several months mean for sure that it's celiac? That would make sense to me, because if it was something else in the first place (e.g. liver failure), a gluten-free diet shouldn't affect that number. But of course, then there's the fact that the biopsy is supposed to be the gold standard. So I guess that's where I'm confused. Isn't TTG IGA a measurement of ACTUAL REPAIR GOING ON TO THE INTESTINES in the first place? Right? Isn't that the body's immune response to damage in the intestines? Or do I have that wrong?

So confused right now! ;)

Thanks in advance!

Thea

The tTG test is the antibody that indicates that your body is making toxic molecules from gluten that damage your villi. It is a measure of the how badly your body is DAMAGING your intestines. So, the fact that it has returned to normal after a gluten free diet is a pretty good indicator that you have Celiac. If it was elevated because of another issue (Crohn's disease, liver disease, etc.) then it would not have gone down.

I would say you don't need a biopsy for a dx. I think the blood work and your response to gluten-free diet are good enough. If it's really important to you to have positive biopsy results, then you will have to go on a gluten challenge for 3 months and torture yourself for a confirmation , but even then the "Gold Standard" biopsy can be falsly negative.

My 2 cents.....in lieu of a biopsy, why not see if the GI doc can order genetic tests to see if you have the genes for Celiac? If you are negative for the genes, it is impossible for you to have it. But if you are positive for the genes, then it's one more piece to the puzzle and the "nail in the coffin", given all the other evidence.

Welcome to the group! Sorry you are here, but glad you are here! :D

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Yes if your blood test was positive and you got relief on the diet and then after that those numbers went down to normal levels you are one of us.

Personally I wouldn't use gene testing as a for sure one way or the other that you are celiac. There is much that we don't know yet about genes and there are many more celiac associated genes than are usually tested for.

Consider yourself diagnosed and keep up the good work with the diet.

Thea-Bug Newbie

Thanks guys!

I also forgot to ask earlier: could my situation just be gluten sensitivity (I realize the distinction doesn't really matter but I just want to know)? I've read conflicting things on this board - some say TTG IGA only shows up with celiac (if it's showing up related to gluten issues - that is, excluding the other reasons a TTG IGA test could be positive), and others say TTG IGA shows up with celiac AND gluten sensitivity.... ???

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thanks guys!

I also forgot to ask earlier: could my situation just be gluten sensitivity (I realize the distinction doesn't really matter but I just want to know)? I've read conflicting things on this board - some say TTG IGA only shows up with celiac (if it's showing up related to gluten issues - that is, excluding the other reasons a TTG IGA test could be positive), and others say TTG IGA shows up with celiac AND gluten sensitivity.... ???

Whether it is celiac or "just" gluten sensitivity really doesn't matter. Just as much damage is done with each and the need to be strictly gluten free is the same no matter what label you put on it. It is a misconception IMHO that gluten sensitivity is less serious.

Thea-Bug Newbie

Yes--just curious if TTG returning to normal was ONLY a sign of celiac, because even though I realize that gluten sensitivity and celiac really aren't different in terms of the treatment, I wonder with how to approach getting my kids tested.

Does anyone know if levels returning to normal always means celiac (as opposed to gluten sensitivity)? I've heard conflicting things.

THanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - lil-oly replied to Jmartes71's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Gluten tester

    2. - knitty kitty replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - JudyLou replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - knitty kitty replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,156
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    mike101020
    Newest Member
    mike101020
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • lil-oly
      Hey there, have you been tested for allergies? You may not only have celiac disease but be allergic. I have celiac disease and am allergic to Barley, wheat and rye. 
    • JudyLou
    • knitty kitty
      I have osteopenia and have cracked three vertebrae.  Niacin is connected to osteoporosis! Do talk to your nutritionist and doctor about supplementing with B vitamins.  Blood tests don't reveal the amount of vitamins stored inside cells.  The blood is a transportation system and can reflect vitamins absorbed from food eaten in the previous twenty-four to forty-eight hours.  Those "normal limits" are based on minimum amounts required to prevent disease, not levels for optimal health.   Keep us posted on your progress.   B Vitamins: Functions and Uses in Medicine https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662251/ Association of dietary niacin intake with osteoporosis in the postmenopausal women in the US: NHANES 2007–2018 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11835798/ Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/   Nutritional Imbalances in Adult Celiac Patients Following a Gluten-Free Diet https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8398893/ Nutritional Consequences of Celiac Disease and Gluten-Free Diet https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7422/15/4/61 Simplifying the B Complex: How Vitamins B6 and B9 Modulate One Carbon Metabolism in Cancer and Beyond https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9609401/
    • JudyLou
      Thank you so much for the clarification! Yes to these questions: Have you consulted dietician?  Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?  Osteoporosis? Thyroid? Anemia?  Do you take any supplements, or vitamins? I’m within healthy range for nutritional tests, thyroid and am not anemic. I do have osteopenia. I don’t take any medications, and the dietician was actually a nutritionist (not sure if that is the same thing) recommended by my physician at the time to better understand gluten free eating.    I almost wish the gluten exposure had triggered something, so at least I’d know what’s going on. So confusing!    Many thanks! 
    • knitty kitty
      @JudyLou,  I have dermatitis herpetiformis, too!  And...big drum roll... Niacin improves dermatitis herpetiformis!   Niacin is very important to skin health and intestinal health.   You're correct.  dermatitis herpetiformis usually occurs on extensor muscles, but dermatitis herpetiformis is also pressure sensitive, so blisters can form where clothing puts pressure on the skin. Elastic waist bands, bulky seams on clothing, watch bands, hats.  Rolled up sleeves or my purse hanging on my arm would make me break out on the insides of my elbows.  I have had a blister on my finger where my pen rested as I write.  Foods high in Iodine can cause an outbreak and exacerbate dermatitis herpetiformis. You've been on the gluten free diet for a long time.  Our gluten free diet can be low in vitamins and minerals, especially if processed gluten free foods are consumed.  Those aren't fortified with vitamins like gluten containing products are.  Have you consulted dietician?  Have you been checked for nutritional deficiencies?  Osteoporosis? Thyroid? Anemia?  Do you take any supplements, medicine, or vitamins? Niacin deficiency is connected to anemia.  Anemia can cause false negatives on tTg IgA tests.  A person can be on that borderline where symptoms wax and wane for years, surviving, but not thriving.  We have a higher metabolic need for more nutrients when we're sick or emotionally stressed which can deplete the small amount of vitamins we can store in our bodies and symptoms reappear.   Exposure to gluten (and casein in those sensitive to it) can cause an increased immune response and inflammation for months afterwards. The immune cells that make tTg IgA antibodies which are triggered today are going to live for about two years. During that time, inflammation is heightened.  Those immune cells only replicate when triggered.  If those immune cells don't get triggered again for about two years, they die without leaving any descendents programmed to trigger on gluten and casein.  The immune system forgets gluten and casein need to be attacked.  The Celiac genes turn off.  This is remission.    Some people in remission report being able to consume gluten again without consequence.   However, another triggering event can turn the Celiac genes on again.   Celiac genes are turned on by a triggering event (physical or emotional stress).  There's some evidence that thiamine insufficiency contributes to the turning on of autoimmune genes.  There is an increased biological need for thiamine when we are physically or emotionally stressed.  Thiamine cannot be stored for more than twenty-one days and may be depleted in as little as three during physical and emotional stresses. Mitochondria without sufficient thiamine become damaged and don't function properly.  This gets relayed to the genes and autoimmune disease genes turn on.  Thiamine and other B vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients are needed to replace the dysfunctional mitochondria and repair the damage to the body.   I recommend getting checked for vitamin and mineral deficiencies.  More than just Vitamin D and B12.  A gluten challenge would definitely be a stressor capable of precipitating further vitamin deficiencies and health consequences.   Best wishes!    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.