Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results

MerrillC1977

Recommended Posts

MerrillC1977 Apprentice
MerrillC1977
Posted

Hubby and I both got our IgA and IgG test results back over the last few days (see picture below).

Obviously, they both appear to be in normal ranges.

My question is: did we receive the same tests? (The "his" and "hers" don't seem to have the exact same wording/names, even though the blood draws took place labs run by the same medical system.)

PS - we were 98% gluten-free for no more than a week-and-a-half before the blood draws -- this shouldn't have caused any false negatives, correct?

Thank you!!

Results.webp

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

You are correct that you each received different tests. The doctor really should have run the full celiac panel for an accurate result (and you should have been eating gluten at the time of testing):

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

So you had the first and second tests (the least specific for celiac) and he had the fourth test (both the IgA and the IgG versions). I have no idea why this occurred unless the lab made a mistake and they were supposed to run all of them on both of you. Doctors have been trained that the tTG is the most specific for celiac, but really we are finding out that the newer DGP is the better test. Also, any IgA test is worthless unless they also run the last test, the total serum IgA, to make sure that you do in fact produce normal IgA antibodies. If this test is low it invalidates any IgA testing. He did at least run both the IgA and IgG versions of the tests, however, to cover that base, so that means that each of you had only one of the four possible tests for celiac (AGA, EMA, tTG and DGP. All in all, not a very satisfactory testing experience :(

MerrillC1977 Apprentice
MerrillC1977
Posted
  • Author

Also, any IgA test is worthless unless they also run the last test, the total serum IgA, to make sure that you do in fact produce normal IgA antibodies. If this test is low it invalidates any IgA testing. He did at least run both the IgA and IgG versions of the tests, however, to cover that base, so that means that each of you had only one of the four possible tests for celiac...

So wait....just to clarify what you wrote: runing both the IgA and IgG versions of the tests covers the base of testing for normal IgA antibodies? Is that what you are saying here? Or are you saying that some other base was covered by running both the IgA and IgG versions of the tests?

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

No what I said very poorly was that if you test low on the total serum IgA test then they need to run the IgG version of any test to get a valid result because you are not a normal IgA producer. The fact that he ran both IgA and IgG versions of a particular test means that the result was valid FOR THAT TEST. Sorry to confuse you. :)

MerrillC1977 Apprentice
MerrillC1977
Posted
  • Author

No what I said very poorly was that if you test low on the total serum IgA test then they need to run the IgG version of any test to get a valid result because you are not a normal IgA producer. The fact that he ran both IgA and IgG versions of a particular test means that the result was valid FOR THAT TEST. Sorry to confuse you. :)

Thank you, and I apologize for being so confused in the first place. So, even though we each got a different set of tests....eact of our sets of tests was valid and probably reliable? (Because each separate set contained both the IgA and IgG versions of our particular tests?)

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

Thank you, and I apologize for being so confused in the first place. So, even though we each got a different set of tests....eact of our sets of tests was valid and probably reliable? (Because each separate set contained both the IgA and IgG versions of our particular tests?)

BUT not valid because you weren't eating gluten at the time.

MerrillC1977 Apprentice
MerrillC1977
Posted
  • Author

BUT not valid because you weren't eating gluten at the time.

I thought it was fine unless your gluten-free time extended many weeks or months? We were only gluten-free for *one* week/10 days maximum prior to testing, and not even 100% gluten-free at that.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I thought it was fine unless your gluten-free time extended many weeks or months? We were only gluten-free for *one* week/10 days maximum prior to testing, and not even 100% gluten-free at that.

That wouldn't throw the tests off.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,900
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.