Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New With Testing Q?


shan1523

Recommended Posts

shan1523 Rookie

Hello, first of all this board is awesome, Ive already read a lot of other posts. My question is this

first...is it true that my child would have had to have been on gluten for a period of time before the basic blood test...it came back negative so my ped thinks all is well...but my son has been gluten-free for about 5 months since each time Ive "tried" a food with gluten he reacts so badly and is in intense pain...

The second question is as a mom who has food issues (not celiac disease but dairy intolerance) I know what it looks and feels like, and can tell besides the diarrhea and the bloated belly and the arching that it puts him in pain to eat it...my question is---is there any benefit to getting a solid diagnosis at this point? I cannot fathom making my son eat gluten for any period of time before tests....even 4 bites of a forbidden food at a family picnic made for a bad time..

Can I just contine the gluten-free diet and pursue it later if needed, or is it never really needed ?

Thanks

Shannon

son 13 months, signs since 5 months, with baby oatmeal and baby barley cereal...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Welcome to the board :D

There is really no point in testing kids under the age of 2 because results are not accurate.

Yes, you have to be on gluten for at least 3 months prior to testing for it to be accurate.

If he is benefiting from the diet then stick with it because that is way better then having your child feel bad.

tarnalberry Community Regular
is it true that my child would have had to have been on gluten for a period of time before the basic blood test?

is there any benefit to getting a solid diagnosis at this point?

Can I just contine the gluten-free diet and pursue it later if needed, or is it never really needed ?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yep. The tests detect antibodies. There are no antibodies in the blood if there's nothing for the immune system to creating antibodies against. It's about 3 months, and a decent dose. (For an adult, that's about 2-3 slices of bread a day, for a child that age, it would be less.)

Eh... The only one who can answer if you need a doctor diagnosis at this time. If you're happy to go based off of his body's signals, that's what really matters.

A definitive diagnosis might be needed if there's a conflict and you need something that is "official", but that might not happy either. You certainly can pursue it later, no matter what.

Guest nini

IMHO there is no reason to test a child with such a STRONG physical response to gluten. You already know what the problem is.

The only time it becomes an issue is in needing Dr.s notes for school for a special diet, BUT if you can get a dr. to back you up and write notes stating the child has a "gluten intolerance" then that should be enough.

My daughter's testing at 3 was inconclusive and the ped. gi just tried to say that she had IBS... her pediatrician supported me in trying the diet and seeing how she did... she did great so we have determined that she does have gluten intolerance. I was positively dx with Celiac before we had her tested, so we know that's what it really is, but the testing in kids is just not as accurate as it needs to be, in my opinion because the kids are too young to really have sustained much damage and the tests are looking for damage... or antibodies from damage...

Oh and once on the gluten-free diet my daughter no longer has IBS... go figure. ;)

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I've never, never, never been asked to Prove my son has celiac disease. He was dx at 3- He's been to preschool, kinder twice in two different schools, been admitted to the hospital once and had three different doctors in the past two years. *we moved twice in one year*. Our records were never caught up with us for first appts. No one questioned his dx. The hospital he was admitted to posted a great big hand written sign outside his room that stated "CELIAC DISEASE - NO GLUTEN". No one has ever asked us to "prove it". So don't worry too much about an official dx. This might be an issue for the future, though. You cannot be in the armed services with Celiac Disease. Insurance Cos have issues with Celiac, so I've read. Until the testing is improved, you control the dx through childhood if you feel you have to. There's no harm in that. Later, testing will probably be improved enough that all these self-dx Celiacs can prove the disease without eating gluten for three months. :)

shan1523 Rookie

Thanks for all your replies. I feel better about my decision...and I am going to wait until age three at least to even "challange" gluten again, and then decide from there if an "official" diagnosis is needed. I often wonder if I should be tested though as I have been given the diagnosis IBS, but I guess soon I may be able to judge just based on the diet since I am going to cook gluten-free/dairy free for all of us, since its just easier that way right now.

Thanks again for all you help

Shannon

Son, 13 months, signs since 5 months

Merika Contributor

Hi,

I'm almost always in support of folks being tested before going gluten-free. In your case, I would wonder too about you being celiac. It is an easy test to do. If your results are positive, you'll have a better indicator for your son too, because this disease runs in families. If you are gluten-free for a few days before your test, no big deal. A few weeks would be a bigger problem.

So consider calling your doc Monday and just slipping in for a quick blood test. The nurse should be able to do it - the doc would barely need to stick his head in the door to say hi. If you say it to them that way, they may be more likely to squeeze you in (you know your doc best), than if they think you want to discuss ad nauseum some esoteric rare illness.....(haha).

Merika


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

I agree with Merika - run in for a blood draw while you are still eating gluten and get the tests done. Since you'll be cooking gluten-free for the family, it seems, after, you may not get the opportunity to do a biopsy if you change your diet right away as well, but you'll get a blood test in while there's still a good opportunity.

shan1523 Rookie

Good point thanks...for me I think I will get tested ASAP since I have been eating gluten, but for my son, Im not turning back now.

Thanks again for all your replies

Shannon

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,164
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JennyK
    Newest Member
    JennyK
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Mmoc! Please include the reference ranges for the IGA and the TTG tests in your next post if you have access to them. We cannot comment much otherwise as different labs use different reference ranges for these tests and also different units of measurement. There are no universal standards as of yet so the raw test numbers are not always helpful. Having said that, if your IGA (what we usually call "total IGA") is low, the TTG-IGA score will be skewed and cannot be trusted. Other kinds of tests for celiac disease would need to be run, particularly those in the IGG family of tests. Perhaps this will be helpful:  
    • Mmoc
      Hi there any advice welcomed. I have had 4 years of symptoms ranging from immune related anaphylactic symptom sudden onset food allergy to peppers/paprika/chilli/capsicum family derivatives. all these allergies fizzled out and following a food challenge test in hospital I reintroduced them a few months ago. Since then my digestive system is a mess. i have since noticed that 4 years ago when testing for iga allergies my iga level was .62 and my ttg was less than .1 (due to symptoms I was probably eating very plainly at that time). should I insist on being retested for celiac? I’ve since read two indicators for celiac include: sensitive to spicy foods when in flare up tooth enamel weakness and symmetrical discolouration patches on teeth which I have had since childhood on my two front teeth     thanks
    • trents
      This article does not address migraines at all.  Yes, red wine and sulfites are often mentioned in connection with migraine triggers. With me, any kind of alcoholic beverage in very modest amounts will reliably produce a migraine. Nitrous oxide generators, which are vaso dialators, also will give me migraines reliably. So, I think most of my migraines are tied to fluctuations vascular tension and blood flow to the brain. That's why the sumatriptan works so well. It is a vaso constrictor. 
    • knitty kitty
      Excessive dietary tyrosine can cause problems.  Everything in moderation.   Sulfites can also trigger migraines. Sulfites are found in fermented, pickled and aged foods, like cheese.  Sulfites cause a high histamine release.  High histamine levels are found in migraine.  Following a low histamine diet like the low histamine Autoimmune Protocol diet, a Paleo diet, helps immensely.    Sulfites and other migraine trigger foods can cause changes in the gut microbiome.  These bad bacteria can increase the incidence of migraines, increasing histamine and inflammation leading to increased gut permeability (leaky gut), SIBO, and higher systemic inflammation.   A Ketogenic diet can reduce the incidence of migraine.  A Paleo diet like the AIP diet, that restricts carbohydrates (like from starchy vegetables) becomes a ketogenic diet.  This diet also changes the microbiome, eliminating the bad bacteria and SIBO that cause an increase in histamine, inflammation and migraine.  Fewer bad bacteria reduces inflammation, lowers migraine frequency, and improves leaky gut. Since I started following the low histamine ketogenic AIP paleo diet, I rarely get migraine.  Yes, I do eat carbs occasionally now, rice or potato, but still no migraines.  Feed your body right, feed your intestinal bacteria right, you'll feel better.  Good intestinal bacteria actually make your mental health better, too.  I had to decide to change my diet drastically in order to feel better all the time, not just to satisfy my taste buds.  I chose to eat so I would feel better all the time.  I do like dark chocolate (a migraine trigger), but now I can indulge occasionally without a migraine after.   Microbiota alterations are related to migraine food triggers and inflammatory markers in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11546420/  
    • trents
      Then we would need to cut out all meat and fish as they are richer sources of tyrosine than nuts and cheese. Something else about certain tyrosine rich foods must be the actual culprit. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.