Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New With Testing Q?


shan1523

Recommended Posts

shan1523 Rookie

Hello, first of all this board is awesome, Ive already read a lot of other posts. My question is this

first...is it true that my child would have had to have been on gluten for a period of time before the basic blood test...it came back negative so my ped thinks all is well...but my son has been gluten-free for about 5 months since each time Ive "tried" a food with gluten he reacts so badly and is in intense pain...

The second question is as a mom who has food issues (not celiac disease but dairy intolerance) I know what it looks and feels like, and can tell besides the diarrhea and the bloated belly and the arching that it puts him in pain to eat it...my question is---is there any benefit to getting a solid diagnosis at this point? I cannot fathom making my son eat gluten for any period of time before tests....even 4 bites of a forbidden food at a family picnic made for a bad time..

Can I just contine the gluten-free diet and pursue it later if needed, or is it never really needed ?

Thanks

Shannon

son 13 months, signs since 5 months, with baby oatmeal and baby barley cereal...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Welcome to the board :D

There is really no point in testing kids under the age of 2 because results are not accurate.

Yes, you have to be on gluten for at least 3 months prior to testing for it to be accurate.

If he is benefiting from the diet then stick with it because that is way better then having your child feel bad.

tarnalberry Community Regular
is it true that my child would have had to have been on gluten for a period of time before the basic blood test?

is there any benefit to getting a solid diagnosis at this point?

Can I just contine the gluten-free diet and pursue it later if needed, or is it never really needed ?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yep. The tests detect antibodies. There are no antibodies in the blood if there's nothing for the immune system to creating antibodies against. It's about 3 months, and a decent dose. (For an adult, that's about 2-3 slices of bread a day, for a child that age, it would be less.)

Eh... The only one who can answer if you need a doctor diagnosis at this time. If you're happy to go based off of his body's signals, that's what really matters.

A definitive diagnosis might be needed if there's a conflict and you need something that is "official", but that might not happy either. You certainly can pursue it later, no matter what.

Guest nini

IMHO there is no reason to test a child with such a STRONG physical response to gluten. You already know what the problem is.

The only time it becomes an issue is in needing Dr.s notes for school for a special diet, BUT if you can get a dr. to back you up and write notes stating the child has a "gluten intolerance" then that should be enough.

My daughter's testing at 3 was inconclusive and the ped. gi just tried to say that she had IBS... her pediatrician supported me in trying the diet and seeing how she did... she did great so we have determined that she does have gluten intolerance. I was positively dx with Celiac before we had her tested, so we know that's what it really is, but the testing in kids is just not as accurate as it needs to be, in my opinion because the kids are too young to really have sustained much damage and the tests are looking for damage... or antibodies from damage...

Oh and once on the gluten-free diet my daughter no longer has IBS... go figure. ;)

Jnkmnky Collaborator

I've never, never, never been asked to Prove my son has celiac disease. He was dx at 3- He's been to preschool, kinder twice in two different schools, been admitted to the hospital once and had three different doctors in the past two years. *we moved twice in one year*. Our records were never caught up with us for first appts. No one questioned his dx. The hospital he was admitted to posted a great big hand written sign outside his room that stated "CELIAC DISEASE - NO GLUTEN". No one has ever asked us to "prove it". So don't worry too much about an official dx. This might be an issue for the future, though. You cannot be in the armed services with Celiac Disease. Insurance Cos have issues with Celiac, so I've read. Until the testing is improved, you control the dx through childhood if you feel you have to. There's no harm in that. Later, testing will probably be improved enough that all these self-dx Celiacs can prove the disease without eating gluten for three months. :)

shan1523 Rookie

Thanks for all your replies. I feel better about my decision...and I am going to wait until age three at least to even "challange" gluten again, and then decide from there if an "official" diagnosis is needed. I often wonder if I should be tested though as I have been given the diagnosis IBS, but I guess soon I may be able to judge just based on the diet since I am going to cook gluten-free/dairy free for all of us, since its just easier that way right now.

Thanks again for all you help

Shannon

Son, 13 months, signs since 5 months

Merika Contributor

Hi,

I'm almost always in support of folks being tested before going gluten-free. In your case, I would wonder too about you being celiac. It is an easy test to do. If your results are positive, you'll have a better indicator for your son too, because this disease runs in families. If you are gluten-free for a few days before your test, no big deal. A few weeks would be a bigger problem.

So consider calling your doc Monday and just slipping in for a quick blood test. The nurse should be able to do it - the doc would barely need to stick his head in the door to say hi. If you say it to them that way, they may be more likely to squeeze you in (you know your doc best), than if they think you want to discuss ad nauseum some esoteric rare illness.....(haha).

Merika


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

I agree with Merika - run in for a blood draw while you are still eating gluten and get the tests done. Since you'll be cooking gluten-free for the family, it seems, after, you may not get the opportunity to do a biopsy if you change your diet right away as well, but you'll get a blood test in while there's still a good opportunity.

shan1523 Rookie

Good point thanks...for me I think I will get tested ASAP since I have been eating gluten, but for my son, Im not turning back now.

Thanks again for all your replies

Shannon

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.