Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Re-Testing For Celiac

StephKelly

Recommended Posts

StephKelly Newbie
StephKelly
Posted

Hi all - I'm new to the forums and am working on going gluten-free. About 2.5 years ago I was tested for Celiac with both a blood test and endoscopy with biopsy. The results came back indicating that I was "gluten sensitive" and did not have Celiac disease. I went on a gluten-free diet for a period of time and was feeling better, but once I learned I didn't have Celiac I went back to eating foods with gluten in them. I was also tested for lactose intolerance, as I've had issues digesting milk, ice cream, and some cheeses for as long as I can remember. The results came back indicating that I am "lactose sensitive" but not intolerant.

I have continued to have stomach issues, and have been putting some pieces of my health puzzle together and wondering if I might have Celiac after all. I've experienced some changes to my health and general state of being (like fatigue), however my dad passed away earlier this year and so I'm not sure if it's coping or something else that's the cause. I'd imagine a combination of factors.

It was extremely frustrating to be told that the things we thought were wrong with me actually weren't, and they couldn't determine why I was (and continue to have) stomach issues. I stopped pursuing a diagnosis out of frustration. In light of recent developments, though, I've been thinking about getting re-tested. My big question is if it's possible to be tested again and get different results, or if once you're tested and it comes back negative that's the end and time won't change the results. I certainly don't need a diagnosis to change my eating habits, but knowing what's going on with me would be nice.

Thanks!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

What, exactly, were the results that lead your doctor to say you were "gluten sensitive"? That doesn't sound like a negative celiac test.

Celiac disease is progressive and yes, you can start with feeling ill from gluten and no blood/biopsy and progress to positive blood/biopsy. There are triggers like illnesses, stress, or pregnancy that can cause someone to develop celiac disease. It's also reasonably common to get get quite ill from non-celiac gluten intolerance and never have positive celiac tests.

There is no harm in getting retested while you're still eating gluten. No matter what the results I would encourage you to go back to gluten-free after the test is done and see how you feel.

cbonner Newbie
cbonner
Posted

Hi Stephkelly.I read your post and thought I could have just changed the name and used it as my own.I (we) get so tired after 20 + years of going to doctors with no answers.I just walked in the door with my blood test that proves I am not celiac and like you I was hoping for the test to provide me with an answer.I know your frustration!I can't even spell hypocondriac ;but I are one.

Going gluten free seems to help me ;so I will continue to avoid it.It just gets to the point where any thing that improves how you feel is worth the effort.I have given up on help from the medical profession and feel the members of this forum make more sense than my doctor.

I hope going gluten free makes you feel better and maybe some day medical doctors will find a way to help us! Good Luck Charles

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

It wouldn't hurt getting retested since you are consuming gluten. I agree with the PP that after you are done with testing go gluten free since you said you felt better that way.

Yes your test results can change. In hindsite I think my youngest son had a gluten issue since he was an infant. By the time I found out I had celiac he was almost 4 and he "seemed" to outgrow the issues he had as a baby/toddler. (his current allergist says that the reactions don't go away just change) I had him, and his older brother blood tested and they were both negative. Two years later when my youngest son was almost 6 he was retested and he had positive blood work. We did not do a scope/biopsy on him and felt confident he had celiac based on his symptoms, positive blood test and a parent with diagnosed celiac. He has been gluten free for a year now and is doing wonderful.

My oldest son has tested negative at least 4 different times on his bloodwork. I decided to have a scope on him just in case he had false negative bloodwork. He had a negative scope/biopsy also. However, due to symptoms and issues he had we decided to trial him gluten free anyway. It has been 3.5 months now and the changes that have started to happen are not easily ignored. He has had dramatic improvement in several areas. So even though the tests "say" he is not celiac, gluten is bad for him none the less.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.