Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctors With Conflicting Advice


TGK112

Recommended Posts

TGK112 Contributor

Here's my story: As a 56 year old I've been losing bone density over the last couple of years despite taking calcium, vitamin D, and Fosamax. I went to a bone specialist who ordered up some tests to see if anything else may be contributing to the osteoporosis. My levels for gluten antibodies came back very high. I had no symptoms besides the bone density issue except for some weight loss ( about 10 lbs) over the last year. Interestingly, over the course of the past 3 months, I've had three doctors giving me drastically different advice. The bone specialist suggested an endoscopy and biopsy, feeling that if it was celiac, he would know that there was a malabsorption issue going on, and if it wasn't celiac, he would still consider me to be gluten intolerant, but that it would not be a contributing factor to the osteoporosis. I went to my primary physician with this information, and she said that considering my blood test results I should go gluten free and not bother with a biopsy. She said that I would feel better - even though I told her that I didn't feel bad! She disagreed with the bone specialist, saying that gluten intolerance or even celiac had nothing to do with osteoporosis. By this time I had done enough reading/research to know that she was wrong! Then I had my gastroenterologist consult. I asked him what if the endoscopy comes back negative? His reply was that I should not bother going gluten free, that without symptoms it may have just been a false positive blood test. I did have the endoscopy, and the gastroenterologist was easily able to see and confirm celiac. Has anyone else had such confusion?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Welcome, TGK, and yes, unfortunately when it comes to celiac/gluten, confusion reigns supreme.

First you should know that if it is covered at all in medical school, it occupies maybe 2-5 minutes (just guessing here, but there is so much for a would-be doctor to learn and it gets short shrift). Someone told me the other day that medical knowledge is doubling every five years, so that makes a lot to cram into medical school. NOT, that I am excusing doctors, because there has been a big push in Continuing Medical Education (CME), particularly aimed at gastroenterologists, to inform about celiac now that it has been "discovered" that it is not a rare disease found in failure-to-thrive children.

Without testing your levels of Vitamin D, you PCP is incorrect in stating that celiac has nothing to do with osteoporosis. Celiac is a primary cause of low levels of D, and without D (and calcium and magnesium) your body cannot make new bone. Since celiac is a disease of malabsorption (hence the failure to thrive in children), most celiacs if they have been suffering for any length of time end up being deficient in many vital nutrients.

Your bone specialist was following the standard diagnostic path for celiac disease -- blood tests, endoscopy with biopsy. If diagnosis confirmed, test for nutritional deficiencies. If not confirmed, eat gluten free.

Your gastroenterologist, who should have been the most informed. was not all that helpful. If your test was a false positive (very rare) then what caused it? And a trial of the gluten free diet should be recommended to see if it helps. Of course, since you believe you have no other symptoms it would be hard to quantify if it were helping if you did not take the additional supplements. Fortunately you were spared this confusion with a positive biopsy. :)

Unfortunately, although one would expect it, your story is not at all uncommon (sorry :D ).

Incidentally, there are diverging opinions on the merits of the so-called bone-building drugs like Fosamax. One school of thought holds that the quality of bone made is not "real" bone, and does not have the same architecture and strength as normal bone. You might explore this further. I know that doctors prescribe "medicines" for everything, but it could well be that if you took the right supplements once you are rid of the gluten you could make better bone than the Fosamax helps you make. It is worth exploring via Mr. Google. It is interesting that osteoporosis is your only symptom (that you currently know of). You should have all your nutrient levels checked - B12 and other B's, A, E, K, ferritin/iron, folate, magnesium, zinc, manganese. Your PCP could order these but perhaps given her attitude it would be better to ask the gastroenterologist.

I wish you the best in restoring your bones to their former strength, and be sure to ask for any help you need in following the gluten free diet.

TGK112 Contributor

Welcome, TGK, and yes, unfortunately when it comes to celiac/gluten, confusion reigns supreme.

First you should know that if it is covered at all in medical school, it occupies maybe 2-5 minutes (just guessing here, but there is so much for a would-be doctor to learn and it gets short shrift). Someone told me the other day that medical knowledge is doubling every five years, so that makes a lot to cram into medical school. NOT, that I am excusing doctors, because there has been a big push in Continuing Medical Education (CME), particularly aimed at gastroenterologists, to inform about celiac now that it has been "discovered" that it is not a rare disease found in failure-to-thrive children.

Without testing your levels of Vitamin D, you PCP is incorrect in stating that celiac has nothing to do with osteoporosis. Celiac is a primary cause of low levels of D, and without D (and calcium and magnesium) your body cannot make new bone. Since celiac is a disease of malabsorption (hence the failure to thrive in children), most celiacs if they have been suffering for any length of time end up being deficient in many vital nutrients.

Your bone specialist was following the standard diagnostic path for celiac disease -- blood tests, endoscopy with biopsy. If diagnosis confirmed, test for nutritional deficiencies. If not confirmed, eat gluten free.

Your gastroenterologist, who should have been the most informed. was not all that helpful. If your test was a false positive (very rare) then what caused it? And a trial of the gluten free diet should be recommended to see if it helps. Of course, since you believe you have no other symptoms it would be hard to quantify if it were helping if you did not take the additional supplements. Fortunately you were spared this confusion with a positive biopsy. :)

Unfortunately, although one would expect it, your story is not at all uncommon (sorry :D ).

Incidentally, there are diverging opinions on the merits of the so-called bone-building drugs like Fosamax. One school of thought holds that the quality of bone made is not "real" bone, and does not have the same architecture and strength as normal bone. You might explore this further. I know that doctors prescribe "medicines" for everything, but it could well be that if you took the right supplements once you are rid of the gluten you could make better bone than the Fosamax helps you make. It is worth exploring via Mr. Google. It is interesting that osteoporosis is your only symptom (that you currently know of). You should have all your nutrient levels checked - B12 and other B's, A, E, K, ferritin/iron, folate, magnesium, zinc, manganese. Your PCP could order these but perhaps given her attitude it would be better to ask the gastroenterologist.

I wish you the best in restoring your bones to their former strength, and be sure to ask for any help you need in following the gluten free diet.

Thank you - your response is very helpful. Although I am not happy with all the doctors' conflicting advice - it is somewhat nice to know that I am not alone.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,901
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.