Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Biopsy Positive (?), Anemia, Confusion With Blood Tests Igg Igb Etc.
0

5 posts in this topic

Hi everyone, I've been reading and following this forum for a while now and would really appreciate help with my current predicament.

I had an upper and lower endoscopy a year ago for Gastroparesis. I recently found out that the biopsy of small intestine showed inflammation and positive sign for possible Celiac. I have no idea what that means, if it's just inflammation or the villi.

I have had all the symptoms of celiac disease for about 15 years but the last year and a half have become severe. I have lost 147 pounds in 18 months which they think is from Gastroparesis although that testing was inconclusive. I can only eat a few foods right now and have absolutely no appetite. I am also anemic and have low B12.

Inflammatory markers in serum are positive and also have a positive ANA with homogenous titer pattern.

Was diagnosed with Primary Sjogrens last week and he also suspects Celiac and maybe Lupus. But my blood tests are confusing me. (haven't seen the doc again yet)

Both my TTG IGg A and IGg Ab show my level at >10 with the 'standard range' listed as >20. Does this mean that my levels are low and that I don't have Celiac?

My Beta globulins are also low.

I sure hope I don't as bread and crackers are among the things I can still eat!

My mother was told she was allergic to wheat when she was in her late 40's. I don't know if she actually had testing or if she and her doctor just figured that out using an elimination diet without testing. Don't know if she had celiac disease.

What do my blood tests mean?

Thanks, Lois

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Well, I do have to admit that that is a very confusing way to report a test result. It means that your antibodies are greater than 10, but does not tell you by how much. To be positive they would have to be greater than 20. Whether that score represents somewhere between 10 and 20 is not at all clear. They should be able to quantify an exact number for you. They also did only one test (well, two if you count the IgA and IgG versions) when a full celiac screening panel consists of the following:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

Bearing in mind the following: The first two tests are the older tests and have been largely replaced by the DGP; and the EMA is usually only run when the tTG is positive, they have not run the newer test, the DGP which is very specific for celiac disease and shows up at an earlier stage than the tTG, and the Total Serum IgA shows whether or not you produce normal quantities of antibodies. But all that aside, you do not have to test positive on all tests. Only one positive is required, and for someone with such longstanding symptoms as yours, with signs of GI damage (??celiac) a year ago, with such a drastic weight loss which is one of the biggie symptoms of celiac (although could be caused by gastroparesis), the anemia and low B12, another autoimmune disease (Sjogrens) and suspicion of lupus, family history of wheat allergy, I would think they absolutely run a total panel on you, along with another EGD with biopsy.

So what does it all mean? At this point, nothing useful. You need to talk to your doctor about it, obviously, but at this point I would think the whole panel is called for rather than just a screening tTG which is the way the doctors usually like to go. But they don't have to live in your body and can afford to say, well, we'll just save some money and run this one test. It is possible for this test to be entirely negative and for you to have celiac disease. It is possible also for this test to be positive and for you to not have the disease, so just running this one test does not tell you a lot of anything.

If you doc is willing to cut to the chase and do another EGD, and take at least six biopsy samples, then do that by all means; it is certainly justified with your dramatic symptoms in the last 18 months. Let us know what your are told after your visit. Welcome to the board and keep in touch and let us know how your testing progresses.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your response and help!

Those two tests are so confusing. The 'standard range' part is confusing, does that mean that normal is above 20 or that to be positve it has to be above 20. Very ambiguous to me. Usually a test will have either a 'reference range' or 'standard range'. This particular University has old testing procedures for some reason.

I just checked and he didn't run the DGP or EMA. I will ask when I see him next month.

I wish the biopsy was more specific too, don't understand why something positive isn't enough for a diagnosis. Can't tell you how often I have tested positive for something but then told only to be told it wasn't significant enough.

I just hate waiting.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally there are three parts to the range: for example, >5 would be negative; 6-9 would be equivocal or mildly positive; <10 would be positive. They usually put in this equivocal range because how can you say that 10 is that much greater than 9 :rolleyes: ?? or 6 that much greater than 5. I guess you could call it a cover your butt range :) But I have never seen scores expressed like yours.

Do you have a copy of the pathology report that you could reproduce here? (The one for the EGD?)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally there are three parts to the range: for example, >5 would be negative; 6-9 would be equivocal or mildly positive; <10 would be positive. They usually put in this equivocal range because how can you say that 10 is that much greater than 9 :rolleyes: ?? or 6 that much greater than 5. I guess you could call it a cover your butt range :) But I have never seen scores expressed like yours.

Do you have a copy of the pathology report that you could reproduce here? (The one for the EGD?)

Yeah, this particular medical system has a long history of old methodology in testing and treatment even though it's a teaching hospital. Go figure.

I don't have the pathology report but that's what I am going to do tomorrow. I will post it as soon as I have it. My suspicion is that they only took one biopsy. Thanks again!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,641
    • Total Posts
      918,437
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Anxiously waiting
      Thanks heaps. I will def be going private if the wait is too long. I have done a little research but i thought a gluten intolerance and coeliac was the same lol. My iron levels are just below average apparently but she said not bad enough for me to be this tired.
    • Celiac.com: Traveling While Gluten-Free? What To Consider From Someone with Celiac Disease
      There are a few definite truths about living gluten-free: You miss bagels every day. Curious friends regularly badger you with questions like “is ... View the full article
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      DH is celiac disease that appears on the skin (gluten triggered).  It does not appear when you are consuming dairy, which sounds like a separate issue for you.   A DH biopsy requires active lesions (new/fresh) from consuming gluten.  So, if you want to be tested via a skin biopsy you must go back on gluten.  Finding a dermatologist who knows exactly how to biopsy for DH is often difficult.  Be sure your Derm is knowledable and has biopsied for DH before. Why no endoscopy for now?  I bet your GI  knows that your insurance will deny the endoscopy.  After all, you tested negative to the blood panel.  Your GI should not even ordered the blood panel knowing that you had been gluten free for months.  You have to be consuming gluten daily for 8 to 12 weeks for the blood test to be accurate.   Did you ever test positive?  Why did your primary diagnose you?  Having the gene just means you can develop celiac disease.  Some 30% of the population carries the genes.  The gene test should only be used to help rule out celiac disease.  
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      No one can say exactly how long you might be able to get a positive dh biopsy after having been gluten free as long as you have been. The Chicago Celiac Disease Center says this: http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/im-scheduled-to-have-a-skin-biopsy-to-screen-for-celiac-disease-should-i-maintain-a-gluten-containing-diet-similar-to-those-who-are-being-screened-via-blood-or-intestinal-biopsy/ http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/faq/what-is-a-gluten-challenge/ You said you had a flare of the plaque psoriasis -- that is NOT dh so why do you think the dh biopsy will show positive? Testing positive for the celiac genes does not mean you have celiac disease. 30+% of the population have the celiac genes but only very, very small fraction of those people do or will present with celiac disease. The gene tests are only used to rule OUT celiac NOT to diagnose it. Frankly, I can understand why your GI does not put any stock in your Primary doc's thinking you have celiac disease. A positive celiac gene and the boils in your armpits which the GI never saw and were never biopsied for dh but they resolved on a gluten free diet and so did your plaque psoriasis. That's all the GI has to go on. I don't know why you are pushing an endoscopy. If you've been eating strictly gluten free then an endoscopic biopsy for celiac will be negative.  Your PCP should have done a celiac blood panel on you back when you were still eating gluten rather than dx you based on the celiac gene you tested positive for.
    • How effective is HD skin biopsy after being gluten free for a year
      I've been gluten free for a year now and my gastro wants to wait for the endocopy until I'm eligible for the colonoscopy when I turn 50 later this year. I don't think she believes I have celiac, even though I tested positive for one of the genes associated with celiac and my primary has diagnosed me as having celiac. The gluten sensitivity blood tests came back negative, of course, since I was gluten free for 9 months at that time. Why is she waiting? At any rate, My digestive system has improved greatly, but when I reintroduced non fat Greek yogurt in my diet, the plaques psoriasis returned on my elbows. My primary believes it is dermatitis herpetiformis (as well as I, since before going gluten free, I used to get boils in my armpits) and I'm scheduled for a skin biopsy in 3 weeks. However, I eliminated dairy from my diet 4 weeks ago and the plaques psoriasis is healing like it did when I eliminated gluten from my diet a year ago. If the scar is reduced to eczema, does that mean there still are IGA deposits in my skin? I don't want to resume dairy since I experienced a cross reaction to the casein in cheese and found lactose was on that same list. So my question is, how long do the granular IGA deposits remain in the skin in order to have a valid skin biopsy test performed for dermatitis herpetiformis? Since it takes 1-2 years for dermatitis herpetiformis to heal on a gluten free diet and I just had a recent flare up, can I continue on my dairy free diet or should I resume eating non fat Greek yogurt for the next 3 weeks just for this skin biopsy?
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
    • ChiaChick  »  Peaceflower

      Hi Peaceflower, Just wanted to say thank you for the chat.
      · 0 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,734
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Cyclonemom
    Joined