Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Two Different Answers From Same Company!


Guest gillian502

Recommended Posts

Guest gillian502

Over the past month I have noticed a disturbing trend when calling the food companies to check on their products: I am getting two different answers depending on who I talk to!

A month ago I had severe diarrhea after eating two types of Jimmy Dean sausage-the pre-cooked and the uncooked. I called the company and was re-assured the pre-cooked was gluten-free, as well as the uncooked. I asked them to send a lettter stating all of their gluten-free sausage. Well, the letter came, stating, "Our uncooked sausages are gluten-free, however, our pre-cooked sausages are NOT gluten-free." The people on the phone told me one thing, the letter said the total opposite.

Then, I called Kaopectate to check on their gluten-free status. The lady on the phone assured me it was gluten-free. I waited, called back a few days later, and a second person told me she would research that because there was no information available. She called me back to inform me kaopectate is NOT gluten-free!

So...what are we supposed to think, here? I feel like I can't trust ANY of the products now. And companies like Kraft who tell you to just look at their labels because they will put stuff in parenthesis if it comes from wheat just make me nervous. I prefer a product by product answer. Anyone else encounter this kind of inconsistency?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SadiesMomma Apprentice

I know it sounds like a pain in the rear... but trust NO ONE! Most people dont understand how important it is for us to remain gluten-free, and many could really care less sadly to say. Its their job, no ones perfect...

I stick to this theory:

"If I dont know 100% that it wont make me sick, I wont eat it"

I have learned not to trust anyone but other celiacs because you guys and gals understand the importance it is... Good luck!

Guest gillian502

But then how do we eat anything? I always thought calling the company was the safest method, as well as checking the ingredients list. Now I feel like these companies don't know their own products, so, that leaves no food for the rest of our lives except fresh meat, vegetables, and fruit, and I know I can't go too long without at least some canned or frozen foods. It's so frustrating!

Guest Libbyk

It seems to me that getting a company to send you a WRITTEn list of their gluten-free products is a more reliable way of getting the info. the person on the phone may not care, or be tired, or read it to you wrong, but if they put it in writing, a company tends to be a lot more particular about the details. If nothing else, because in our litigious society, writng things down puts them at risk for a lawsuit if it wrong. Just my theory

Libby

Guest jhmom

Libby,

I was thinking that very same thing. The problem is sometimes we are in such a hurry we just call their 800#, I think I will try to start planning ahead more often and get it in writing.

Guest gillian502

I just wish more companies would put in in writing. About 70% I've spoken to so far won't, probably because they are afraid of a lawsuit. If I'm given two opposing answers about a product as I have been given lately, I don't even take the chance anyway. It just makes me wonder how many times I've taken a representative's word for something that is wrong and haven't realized it!

Guest Libbyk

what I have done is to call the 800# (I am pretty lazy, jhmom) and ask my question AND ask for any written info they have. Not all, but a number of companies (hormel, wild oats, etc) have offerd to email or mail me a written list of their gluten-free products.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,129
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kkaayy
    Newest Member
    kkaayy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I’m so sorry you’re going through this—it sounds like your body is sending a clear signal that gluten is a major trigger for your Hashimoto’s. The dramatic spike in your anti-TPO (from 50 to 799!) and the severe symptoms you’re experiencing suggest a strong immune reaction, even if celiac testing wasn’t done earlier. While a formal diagnosis would clarify cross-contamination risks, continuing the challenge may not be worth the damage to your thyroid and quality of life, especially since you already know gluten worsens your antibodies and symptoms. If you need answers, you could discuss genetic testing (HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genes) with your doctor—this can rule out celiac predisposition without a gluten challenge. For now, prioritizing your health by quitting gluten again (strictly, given your sensitivity) and supporting gut healing (like probiotics, L-glutamine, or zinc carnosine) might be the wisest path. Your thyroid will thank you!
    • trents
      Well then, I'd say he's making excellent progress. It can take some time for antibody numbers to normalize. Even though new antibodies are no longer being produced, it takes a while for the old ones to be disposed of. Make sure you keep an eye on the alkaline phosphatase levels. It is probably true that is tied to his adolescent growth spurt but it's worth tracking. Thirteen years of elevated liver enzymes was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But I was 50 years old by that time and it was my ALT and AST that were mildly elevated all that time, not my alk phos. I just found out last week from an ultrasound that my liver is 20% larger than normal and I'm hoping that is a legacy effect. I have more testing lined up. 
    • CeliacMom79
      Hi. Sorry, his previous levels were >250 and we do not know how high they were. So yes, "off the chart". By 'detectable' I just meant that at 234 we now actually have a number as a baseline that we can measure future labs against. All his other liver test functions have been normal.  Just the elevated ALP. Thank you.
    • NoGlutenCooties
      Hi all I'm looking for a safe place to eat in Wilmington, DE. Any ideas? Thanks Jenny
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @CeliacMom79! Not sure what you mean when you say you are pleased that his ttg levels are now at "detectable levels"? Earlier in your narrative you said they were originally above 250. Was 250 the upper limit of the scale that was used, such that you actually don't know how high they were originally, i.e. "off the charts"?  Were his other liver test functions (ALT, AST) originally elevated?
×
×
  • Create New...