Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Don't Know What To Tell The Doctor....help Please?


Greengal

Recommended Posts

Greengal Rookie

Hello,

I've been having stomach problems for awhile now and am seeing a GI specialist who didn't feel it was warranted to test me for celiac. Based on everything I'm reading, I disagree, but I wonder if maybe I left out some important details when discussing things with the doctor. He was very rushed and didn't give me much time, so I just discussed the worst of the symptoms:

-bad diarrhea and occasional constipation

-bloating and severe gas

-indigestion

-fatigue

I've had other problems as of late, such as severe headaches, hoarseness (especially when waking which I've never had before), muscle aches and others which I didn't think we're relevant to mention to the doctor. Also, I was reading about the skin condition associated with Celiac (so sorry I forgot it's name) and I realized that I have something like that as well. I always assumed they were just pimples, but I always thought it was strange that the bumps I get are almost always bilateral! And I never thought to mention that to the doctor.

Anyways, when I brought up celiac, he said that I would be thinner if I had it. I could be wrong, but I didn't think everyone with Celiac got really thin? I've lost about 15 pounds in the last month and a half without effort, but I'm still slightly overweight...however, I gained the weight a year and a half ago when I started the drug Paxil, so I've not always been this heavy.

Anyways, I went back to my regular doctor and said I really wanted the Celiac test done, and he's doing it even though the GI wouldn't...what does everyone here think? Is that a waste of time? Is there other things I should be telling the doctor?

Sorry this post was so long, I"m just very frustrated.

Thanks,

Kelly


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Kelly,

If you have a rash that could be Dermatitis Herpetiformis, then you could try going to a dermatologist and ask them to biopsy the rash. They would look for IgA deposits in the skin.

I personally would mention all your symptoms to any doctor you can get to. Odds are that one of them might notice something the others missed.

I was told the same thing by one of my previous GI doctors, about the fact that I weighed too much to be Celiac. That is just not true. Weight gain can also be an symptom if Celiac in some people. And most people only lose weight when theyir intestines are damaged to the point that they are not absorbing much of anything at all.

Let us know what the test results say. I ended up doing the same thing, getting the blood test done by my primary doctor, since none of the GI's I went to would do them. I was unintentionally on a low gluten diet, and my bloodtest came back negative. I don't know if there just wasn't enough damage in my intestines to cause the antibodies to reach my blood, or if I wasn't producing very many antibodies due to the low gluten consumption, but I have such a severe reaction to gluten that I knew it was my problem. I ended up being tested by Enterolab. Positive for the main gene for Celiac and positive for the antibodies as well.

God bless,

Mariann

gbeauvais Newbie

The doctors never did recognize what was wrong with me. I had to do the research myself, much as you are doing. Finally, I found a GI doctor on this website who was experienced in celiac disease and I had him do the biopsy myself. I don't have insurance, so I paid the approximately $2500 myself on my credit card. I'm really glad I did, because I would have just gotten sicker and sicker and then had the cascade effect of all the other diseases that are able to come in on the coattails of undiagnosed celiac disease.

In my opinion, a doctor who is too rushed to give you the right amount of time or too know-it-all to listen is a bad investment. Much of the info available on celiac disease now is very new. Unless a doctor is really keeping up on the latest details, they probably wouldn't know what they needed to diagnose you. The thing about celiac disease is that you can have it and have very atypical symptoms, or no symptoms at all and still have it in there, doing the damage. The blatant symptoms come when all the damage is done. Trust yourself and keep going! Good luck!

Gerri

lauradawn Explorer

My personal opinion is that you should tell your Dr about everyhting that seems not normal to you... I did the same thing. I have had so many problems, some severe and some exremely minor. When going in to my thyroid Dr, they wanted me to update the list of current or issues that I have had in the past. I thought some of the questions were ridiculous.... But as it turns out he is actually the one that ordered the tests. I will not 2nd guess those questionairs anymore. They may have saved me. I would also strongly suggest finding a Dr that you feel you have the time to tell him everything. I HATE FEELING RUSHED!!!!

angel-jd1 Community Regular

Before I was diagnosed I would write down any symptom on a piece of paper, then when I went to the dr I would take that paper with me. I also tried to monitor body temp.

Sometimes it is easy to get into the office and forget key things that you wanted to tell the dr about, so write it down!! It sure helped me.

-Jessica :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.