Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Important Is Full Celiac Panel Blood Test?


floridanative

Recommended Posts

floridanative Community Regular

I am looking for help regarding getting a proper diagnosis for whatever is wrong with me. I had unexplained anemia but some antibody level was way too high so the GI doc said that explains why my iron stores are so low (after taking tons if it for 8 weeks) but he said we'd have to see why the antibody level was so high. He mentioned celiac disease and then scheduled me for a colonoscopy to look for more serious problems first (and to follow insurance protocol). So he finds nothing except that I have diverticulosis (can cause mild bloating and stomach cramps) and he tells me to eat more fiber. I already eat a ton of fiber but didn't when I was younger so I'm sure that's when the damage occured.

Okay, so this diagnosis could explain why I have the occasional intestinal problems but it doesn't explain the anemia. So now they want to schedule a biopsy to check for celiac disease. Well I realize this test is necessary to confirm celiac disease but shouldn't I have a full Celiac panel blood test done first to see what that shows? I don't have enough folic acid in my system and sometimes this causes iron deficient anemia in people. If that happened with me, then I could take an rx folic acid which is what my reg. doc told me to do when she called with the homocystene level results. Anyone out there have any suggestions as to what my next step in testing should be? I guess I don't want to get myself into a situation where my blood work doesn't support the GI's suspicion since then he may refuse to do the biopsy. And of course if I do have celiac disease I need to know so I can begrudgingly start the gluten-free diet asap. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Tiffany M.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kolney Newbie
I am looking for help regarding getting a proper diagnosis for whatever is wrong with me. I had unexplained anemia but some antibody level was way too high so the GI doc said that explains why my iron stores are so low (after taking tons if it for 8 weeks) but he said we'd have to see why the antibody level was so high. He mentioned celiac disease and then scheduled me for a colonoscopy to look for more serious problems first (and to follow insurance protocol). So he finds nothing except that I have diverticulosis (can cause mild bloating and stomach cramps) and he tells me to eat more fiber. I already eat a ton of fiber but didn't when I was younger so I'm sure that's when the damage occured.

Okay, so this diagnosis could explain why I have the occasional intestinal problems but it doesn't explain the anemia. So  now they want to schedule a biopsy to check for celiac disease. Well I realize this test is necessary to confirm celiac disease but shouldn't I have a full Celiac panel blood test done first to see what that shows? I don't have enough folic acid in my system and sometimes this causes iron deficient anemia in people. If that happened with me, then I could take an rx folic acid which is what my reg. doc told me to do when she called with the homocystene level results. Anyone out there have any suggestions as to what my next step in testing should be? I guess I don't want to get myself into a situation where my blood work doesn't support the GI's suspicion since then he may refuse to do the biopsy. And of course if I do have celiac disease I need to know so I can begrudgingly start the gluten-free diet asap. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Tiffany M.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

kolney Newbie

The blood work is not conclusive, but the biopsy is. Go with the biopsy first. The blood work can confirm the biopsy if your doctor still wants to do that. I would so you have starting numbers with which to compare future blood tests. Being gluten free isn't that bad. I've been at it since September 03. I like to cook and bake so that is to my advantage. Health food stores and on line stores make gluten-free foods readily available. Do your homework and you'll be fine if you have celiac disease. Good luck. :)

Kathryn

Zeeland, MI

floridanative Community Regular

Thanks Kathryn - I have already been to a gluten-free food seminar since it was the last one for a while and figured it wouldn't hurt to go and find out all I could for free. I know that I will have lots of options of fine substitutes. My fear is that I will have a really hard time eating out (we do so often) and we travel to places we don't even speak the language so I can't even explain my needs correctly. Guess I can take a foreign guide card with me and hope for the best.

I'll schedule the biopsy this week and see what they find. Thanks for your post and encouragement. :)

Tiffany M.

Nevadan Contributor

Tiffany,

Sorry to muddy the waters; however, I also have anemia (and osteoporosis). I did the g/gluten-free diet challenge on my own and found some other gastro symptoms ( gas, bloat, constipation) went away within 48 hrs so I knew my body didn't really like gluten. After going gluten-free this past June I subsequently was tested by Enterolab who confirmed what I already had deteremined (I'm gluten sensitive) plus their DNA analysis found I have a pair of HLA-DQ1 genes which make me unlikely to have intestinal villi damage(no celiac disease) , but do make me susceptible to non-celiac disease gluten sensitivity which is related to some pretty bad diseases which I would rather not experience. I've done some research and found references indicating that people with this form of gluten sensitivity even without celiac disease (villi damage) can have nutrient metabolism problems. This could cause such things as vitamin/mineral deficiencies and the resulting anemia, osteo, etc. After 6 months of gluten-free diet I'm looking forward to rechecking my anemia with the hope that it has improved.

The bottom line is that even if you don't turn out to have celiac disease, you could still have non-celiac disease gluten sensitivity. Positive response to a gluten-free diet would confirm that. You might want to have DNA testing just to check your probabilities. DNA results don't confirm disease, but they do indicate what you might be suseptible to having.

Hope this helps.

George

tarnalberry Community Regular

Standard protocol is blood work first (full panel) and then biopsy. The biopsy is currently considered the gold standard, though that may change. Frankly, I'd probably do both at the same time, but I don't know if your doctor would go with that.

floridanative Community Regular

Thanks everyone. I think I will try and do both the biopsy and blood work on the same day if they let me.

George - did you take iron for your anemia and are you still? At this point I can't go but a week or so without iron pills and function normally. I'm thinking if I go on the gluten-free diet, I should stay on the iron for a couple of months and then go off them and see what happens. The worst symptom I have is the fatigue from the anemia. Any tips on staying on/going off iron?

Thanks!

Tiffany M.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nevadan Contributor
George - did you take iron for your anemia and are you still?

Tiffany M.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Tiffany,

My anemia is not too bad - My Red Blood Count (RBC) runs about 10% below the minimum of the "Acceptable" range. I'm not sure if this effects my energy levels since it's been this way forever. The only iron supplement I've ever taken is a multivitamin which has 30% of the Min Daily Requirement of iron. Several dr's had told me repeatedly not to worry about being 10% low since I had been that way so long and it wasn't getting worse - said it was probably "normal" for me - so much for dr's :angry: It wasn't until about May-June of this year when I learned about gluten sensitivtity that I began to suspect their recommendations. Since going gluten-free I would now like to see if there is any improvement in my RBC just due to diet alone; therefore, I'm delaying adding any other supplements until I reach the 6 month point and have my RBC checked again - just the scientist in me wanting to validate the gluten-free diet :)

Hope this makes sense.

George

julie5914 Contributor

My iron got so bad before celiac was found that I could not walk around the block. I would be absolutely exhausted. And I used to run. I was started on iron pills then (around March) and started the gluten-free diet in June. I stopped taking iron pills sometime in May I think. My iron levels have not dropped. In fact they are higher than they have ever been. Get both blood work and endoscopy. It will make you and your doctor both happy. GI docs love to scope. :D

VydorScope Proficient
The blood work is not conclusive, but the biopsy is.

Ummmm, the biopsy is only conclusive IF its postive. If you get a negative result then, it only says "you probably dont have celiac disease, but you sitll might".

Nevadan Contributor
George - did you take iron for your anemia and are you still?

Tiffany M.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Just a little more elaboration on my anemia situation. My mother had anemia all her life too and it got much worse as she got older and did not respond to supplements. My older brother also has anemia which has worsened as he got older - he also has osteoporosis as I do (and one of his sons). Based on this, our anemia and osteo are almost certainly genetic. There are several different genetic causes for anemia & osteo with gluten sensitivity being only one possibility; however since I have a double HLA-DQ1 gene pair, I know that both parents had at least one each so DQ1 is definitely in the family. To my thinking, the anemia/osteo/DQ1 combo along with some gastro & neuro symptoms that have gotten better with the gluten-free diet makes it more likely that gluten sensitivity is the root cause for most of these problems - I actually hope that is the case. Any improvement in my anemia will be just one more bit of evidence to support this.

P.S. Since the DQ1 gene(s) do not make villi damage probable, if I had an endoscopy it would probably turn out negative. The key fact is that endoscopy is mostly useful for detecting celiac disease("the tip of the iceberg"), but not necessarily for detecting non-celiac disease gluten sensitivity which can be just as serious health-wise. In my personal opinion, endoscopy is way overrated.

George

floridanative Community Regular

Again - thanks everyone for your repsonses.

George your first post did make perfect sense and I'm thinking my doc may indeed say I can not have celiac disease or gluten intolerance if my biopsy is negative. If it is negative and my blood work is mostly positive (one test is for sure) then I guess the next step is going gluten-free and see where that takes me. If after being on the diet for say six months my blood work looks normal, guess that's all the proof I need to confirm I have to live gluten-free.

Tiffany M.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.