Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Lactose Intolerance Cause My Symptoms?

Ikgbrd

Recommended Posts

Ikgbrd Apprentice
Ikgbrd
Posted

So I received the results of my biopsy today, which my doctor said showed no signs of celiac disease, which is kind of disappointing, but expected, as I've been off gluten for almost two months. He said the next thing he wanted me to do was test for lactose intolerance.

After reading up on lactose it really doesn't sound like it fits my symptoms though. For everyday of the last few days I've had severe abdominal cramps when I eat and before I have bowel movements, loose stool, occasional diarrhea, and occasional bloody stool. I'll admit I eat a fair share of dairy, but I've never really notice a correlation. In fact the thing that's been easiest on my stomach since going gluten free has been dairy based soup.

Would lactose intolerance cause symptoms this severe? I really don't think I should rule out celiac, and lactose intolerance doesn't seem to be much of a fit.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


love2travel Mentor
love2travel
Posted

I believe you could still have celiac disease. Unfortunately, your doctor obviously did not tell you that you must be consuming gluten prior to biopsies. Do you know how many were taken? If only a few then it could have been missed. The leading celiac doc in Canada maintains that only 30% of biopsies are done correctly. I went to her lecture and will try to find my handout info on this. She is also a medical school prof who is now teaching students on how they should be done.

Anyway, lactose, up until two months ago, caused me the same symptoms as you. Far more noticeable than when I ingested gluten awhile ago. I went for ages unable to ingest lactose but now suddenly can again. It is often recommended that those recently diagnosed with celiac go lactose free for several months to allow your gut to heal.

Hopefully you will feel tons better quickly!

Ikgbrd Apprentice
Ikgbrd
Posted
  • Author

I'm not sure how many biopsies were taken, and my doctor really doesn't seem to know much about celiac. I purposely didnt eat gluten for the biopsy, because my symptoms had improved a bit and I didn't want to risk getting more severe symptoms again.

If my lactose intolerance were being caused by going gluten free, would a test still come back as positive for lactose intolerance, or would I actually have to have an ongoing intolerance?

I definately eat dairy products a lot, on a daily basis for the most part, so I suppose that could explain while I'm still getting symptoms. It seems strange to me though that I only occasionally get diarrhea, and it doesn't seem to have any correlation with what I eat. One day I'll be fine after eating something and a week later I'll get diarrhea. It's incredibly frustrating.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I agree that you could still have celiac or non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), which has all the same nasty symptoms minus the villi damage. If you choose not to pursue celiac blood tests, I recommend staying gluten-free since it was helping.

 

I am lactose intolerant and my immediate symptoms are the same as a glutening for me: stomach pain, bloating and a headache. The severity of the symptoms varied based on.... who knows what, but it wasn't always the same.LOL  I read that approximately 50% of celiacs are lactose intolerant when they are diagnosed, although that changes for some as time goes on.

 

Best wishes.

Ikgbrd Apprentice
Ikgbrd
Posted
  • Author

I did already receive blood test while on gluten. Everything was normal except my Dga IgA came back as a 38. From everything I've read, this leads me to believe celiac is very likely, but my GI insists that my other levels should be elevated as well, and because my biopsy was negative he pretty much dismissed the idea completely, even though I informed him I'd gone off gluten beforehand.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Unless the GI can tell you what caused the DGP IgA to be elevated (besides celiac disease) I would assume it is celiac disease.  There are many people around here who have only one or two positive tests - most are like that I would hazard to guess. It seems to me that the unusual one are the ones with every blood test positive along with a positive biopsy. I think you are in with the majority of celiacs - those with just enough negative tests to be confusing. :(

 

Maybe try going gluten-free and dairy free and hopefully that will be enough for you to feel well.

 

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      My only proof

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      My only proof

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      Gluten related ??

      By AlwaysLearning · Posted

      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      KAN-101 Treatment for Coeliac Disease

      By Russ H · Posted

      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      Nicotine Gum For Gluten Symptoms.. Am I Crazy?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.