Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Someone Take A Look At My Test Results?


deee

Recommended Posts

deee Newbie

Hey guys,

 

I've been trying to figure out what's wrong with my body. I'm 24 years old (male) and for the last couple years I have trouble healing certain injuries. If I fall and hurt my wrist, the pain won't go away with time. If I hit my knuckle on something, it's tender for the next 2 months, instead of healing the same week like it would with most people. I can list off a huge list of problems I have (shin splints, shoulder pain, back pain, headaches, I look tired all the time (bags under eyes) etc)

 

My doctor isn't very proactive, I had like 10 tests done before this one to check for deficiencies in vitamins and minerals and all I got was a 3 second message from my doctors office. I had to pick up the paperwork and try to figure it all out myself.

 

So I was hoping someone could look at my results for my "Celiac Disease Antibody Profie CELIAC" that I just received and tell me if I have anything to worry about related to allergies to gluten, or if you have any other ideas what might be wrong with me, I'd appreciate it.

 

Thanks!

 

20130802_125758.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.

 

The celiac screen your doctor used is an older one but a couple of those tests are still used by most doctors. The tTG IgA shows that damage is attempting to be inflicted on the gut but yours is negative. The problem is that your doctor did not test your total serum IgA which is a control test to make sure you make enough IgA for the IgA based tests to be accurate - 5% of celiacs are deficient in IgA. It is possible that you are low in IgA so I suggest getting that tested to make sure your tests are actually an accurate representation of what's going on. Right now it looks negative for celiac.

 

The EMA IgA test (titre) is positive only when advanced damage occurs in the intestine. It is very unusual for an EMA test to be positive if the tTG test is negative.

 

I know very little about the reticulin tests except that they are older and haven't been used much for about 10 years.

 

The anti-gliadin tests (AGA IgA and AGA IgG) are not used as much anymore either. They test for sensitivity to gliadin (gluten) and are thought by some to work for testing non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI) as well as celiac disease, the only problem is that the tests aren't the most sensitive or specific, meaning they don't catch all people with celiac disease or NCGI and when they are positive it is not always due to a gluten issue.

 

This report has more info on the tests on pages 10-12: Open Original Shared Link

 

The only celiac disease tests they did not run were the deaminated gliadin peptides (DGP IgA and DGP IgG) and the tTG IgG. The DGP test is a new good one, and it seems to compliment the tTG tests by picking up many celiac disease cases that the tTG's do not. There is also the endoscopic biopsy; there are a few around here who had negtive blood tests but a positive biopsy - that could possibly apply to you too. If you decide to have those tests done, make sure you are still eating gluten or it will affect the results.

 

Right now, if I assume your total serum IgA is normal, it looks like you don't have celiac disease. It is possible you have NCGI for which there are no fully accepted blood tests yet, only a positive trial on the gluten-free diet is diagnostic. Those with NCGI will have all of the symptoms of celiac disease but no villi blunting.

 

How is your thyroid? Those with hypothyroidism have a slower metabolism as well as aches and pains. If you get it checked, your TSH should be near a 1 and your free T4 and free T3 should be in the 50-75% range of your lab's normal reference range.

 

Good luck with future testing or the gluten-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,074
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ImVenus
    Newest Member
    ImVenus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.