Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

This Testing Is Starting To Mess With My Head...


Mum in Norway

Recommended Posts

Mum in Norway Contributor

Sooo long story short.

I have suspected that I have celiac for years, but been told I don't by a doctor soly based on a hometest that only tests for tTg IgA.

Then this spring, after beeing glutenfree light for years, another doc wanted to give me propper testing when I mentiond this when I was just in for a regular allergy test (pollen, mainly).

This test came back almost normal, exept DGP IgG was 9, when it was suposed to be less that 7. Some reserch, and i found that had it been 10 it would have been considerd positive for celiac, so I called the doctor and explained that as I had been glutenfree light for years and the test was borderline positive, maybe I needed to do a gluten challange for a few weeks to see if that changed anything? Yes, that was a good idea, says doc.

So I started my challange, and got reeeealy ill. After two weeks I gave up and had the second test done. My DGP IgG was now 10, but I do not know if any of the other antibodys had changed as I do not have a print of the results, only told that all the others was within the normal range.

But this was enough for doc to order a biopsy.

The hospital told me to follow a 'normal' diet (bread 3 times a day an something containing gluten for dinner two or three times a week) for two months.

This made me so so sick, I could not even go to work. But I survived.

A week ago I decided to have a third bloodtest done. I figured it would be hard to believe it if the biposy came back negative, but if I also saw that the antibodies in my blood had not changed, I would trust the result and conclude I 'just' have gluten sensitivity.

I had the biopsy 5 days ago, so I don't have the results yet, But I called today to ask about the bloodtest.

Funny thing!

DGP IgG was now 11! I would have thought it would be a little more positive by now, if I actually do have celiac? But still, that IS positive, and I do get really ill from consuming gluten.

I have not seen the results yet, I was only told on the phone that DGP IgG is 11 and that tTg IgA is less than one, when normal is less than 7. I'm going by the docs office later today to get a copy of the results.

 

What am I suposed to make of this?

More elevated = I have celiac?

Only slightly more elevated after two months of challange = not significant?

 

I do know that DGP IgG is very spesiffic for celiac, like 98-99%.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Have they ever tested your total IGA? If that is low that would cause a false negative on the IGA testing. Your other test was positive and you reacted badly to the challenge. No matter what label you are given by the doctors your body is telling you it needs you to avoid gluten. I hope you get a clear answer from the biopsy but those can also be a false negative for many reasons.

Glad your done with testing and can now just go gluten free and heal. Hope you feel better soon.

Mum in Norway Contributor

For some more strangeness; I now got the full results of all my three tests. And that shows that as my serum IgA has been at a stabile 2,2, the tTG IgA has gon from 2 on the first test throug 1 on the second and is now <1. WHAT is THAT about!?

 

Thank you ravenwoodglass, I have been glutenfree for a week now and already feel so much bether :D

nvsmom Community Regular

The antibody level aren't completely linked to the amounts of gluten you eat. Some people have total villi damage yet they don't have positive blood tests, and others might have sky-high blood tests yet have no, or just minor damage to their villi. There are "classic" cases where antibody levels, villi damage, and gluten amounts consumed correlate perfectly but that is not everybody... I doubt it is even the majority of celiacs.

 

When I was diagnosed, I had two blood tests done: EMA IgA and tTG IgA. Both were positive. After over a year gluten-free, my EMA was negative but my tTG IgA was still positive - not as high as it was, but still positive. Those autoantibodies can linger a looong time, and conversely take a long time to build up to measurable levels.

 

You have two different positive blood tests on more than one occassion, which is more than many people get. You have a positive response to the gluten-free diet too, and you may end up with a positive biopsy.... It is definitely time to go gluten-free.

 

I would say you have celiac disease. Non-celiac gluten intolerance NEVER causes a positive tTG IgA or DGP IgA. A low tTG IgA can be caused by other factors but when it is combined with DGP tests, well... that really only points to celiac. So even if the doctors don't say it, I think you should claim the diagnosis for yourself. You are a celiac.

 

I hope you continue to feel better on the gluten-free diet and have very clear cut biopsy results.  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    2. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
    • trents
      I don't know of a connection. Lots of people who don't have celiac disease/gluten issues get shingles.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.