Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

This Testing Is Starting To Mess With My Head...


Mum in Norway

Recommended Posts

Mum in Norway Contributor

Sooo long story short.

I have suspected that I have celiac for years, but been told I don't by a doctor soly based on a hometest that only tests for tTg IgA.

Then this spring, after beeing glutenfree light for years, another doc wanted to give me propper testing when I mentiond this when I was just in for a regular allergy test (pollen, mainly).

This test came back almost normal, exept DGP IgG was 9, when it was suposed to be less that 7. Some reserch, and i found that had it been 10 it would have been considerd positive for celiac, so I called the doctor and explained that as I had been glutenfree light for years and the test was borderline positive, maybe I needed to do a gluten challange for a few weeks to see if that changed anything? Yes, that was a good idea, says doc.

So I started my challange, and got reeeealy ill. After two weeks I gave up and had the second test done. My DGP IgG was now 10, but I do not know if any of the other antibodys had changed as I do not have a print of the results, only told that all the others was within the normal range.

But this was enough for doc to order a biopsy.

The hospital told me to follow a 'normal' diet (bread 3 times a day an something containing gluten for dinner two or three times a week) for two months.

This made me so so sick, I could not even go to work. But I survived.

A week ago I decided to have a third bloodtest done. I figured it would be hard to believe it if the biposy came back negative, but if I also saw that the antibodies in my blood had not changed, I would trust the result and conclude I 'just' have gluten sensitivity.

I had the biopsy 5 days ago, so I don't have the results yet, But I called today to ask about the bloodtest.

Funny thing!

DGP IgG was now 11! I would have thought it would be a little more positive by now, if I actually do have celiac? But still, that IS positive, and I do get really ill from consuming gluten.

I have not seen the results yet, I was only told on the phone that DGP IgG is 11 and that tTg IgA is less than one, when normal is less than 7. I'm going by the docs office later today to get a copy of the results.

 

What am I suposed to make of this?

More elevated = I have celiac?

Only slightly more elevated after two months of challange = not significant?

 

I do know that DGP IgG is very spesiffic for celiac, like 98-99%.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Have they ever tested your total IGA? If that is low that would cause a false negative on the IGA testing. Your other test was positive and you reacted badly to the challenge. No matter what label you are given by the doctors your body is telling you it needs you to avoid gluten. I hope you get a clear answer from the biopsy but those can also be a false negative for many reasons.

Glad your done with testing and can now just go gluten free and heal. Hope you feel better soon.

Mum in Norway Contributor

For some more strangeness; I now got the full results of all my three tests. And that shows that as my serum IgA has been at a stabile 2,2, the tTG IgA has gon from 2 on the first test throug 1 on the second and is now <1. WHAT is THAT about!?

 

Thank you ravenwoodglass, I have been glutenfree for a week now and already feel so much bether :D

nvsmom Community Regular

The antibody level aren't completely linked to the amounts of gluten you eat. Some people have total villi damage yet they don't have positive blood tests, and others might have sky-high blood tests yet have no, or just minor damage to their villi. There are "classic" cases where antibody levels, villi damage, and gluten amounts consumed correlate perfectly but that is not everybody... I doubt it is even the majority of celiacs.

 

When I was diagnosed, I had two blood tests done: EMA IgA and tTG IgA. Both were positive. After over a year gluten-free, my EMA was negative but my tTG IgA was still positive - not as high as it was, but still positive. Those autoantibodies can linger a looong time, and conversely take a long time to build up to measurable levels.

 

You have two different positive blood tests on more than one occassion, which is more than many people get. You have a positive response to the gluten-free diet too, and you may end up with a positive biopsy.... It is definitely time to go gluten-free.

 

I would say you have celiac disease. Non-celiac gluten intolerance NEVER causes a positive tTG IgA or DGP IgA. A low tTG IgA can be caused by other factors but when it is combined with DGP tests, well... that really only points to celiac. So even if the doctors don't say it, I think you should claim the diagnosis for yourself. You are a celiac.

 

I hope you continue to feel better on the gluten-free diet and have very clear cut biopsy results.  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,435
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.