Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Scientific Studies About Consequences Of Untreated Celiac


ArPlasma

Recommended Posts

ArPlasma Rookie

Hello all,

I was wondering whether you might have some ref papers about the consequences of untreated Celiac( with data, description of samples, etc.).

My DH, awaiting for his biopsy results, is starting to doubt whether since he is 'asymptomatic'( according to him...), he should go on a strict gluten-free diet if he is diagnosed. His GI said, he would still recommend it, no matter outcome of biopsy, based on blood tests and family history( our DS, three of his aunts, uncle, 2 first cousins are officially diagnosed plus 2 siblings with IBS and other GI issues) but at the end of the day it will be DH's choice. If positive, obviously he( GI doctor) told DH that gluten-free is the only way to go.

Well, DH is not 'convinced' that strict gluten-free is the only option...if he was not my husband, I could let him figure it out for himself but I care.

So I am looking for a 'state of the art'/ review of studies kind of paper that he could go through. In particular the impact of going untreated on 'asymptomatic' Celiac sufferers, for which his hypothesis that having a minimal gluten intake( read a beer) every now and then is not going to significantly impact the outcomes( I.e. increase risk of other diseases).

Thanks for any help you can provide!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Hello all,

I was wondering whether you might have some ref papers about the consequences of untreated Celiac( with data, description of samples, etc.).

My DH, awaiting for his biopsy results, is starting to doubt whether since he is 'asymptomatic'( according to him...), he should go on a strict gluten-free diet if he is diagnosed. His GI said, he would still recommend it based on blood tests and family history( our DS, three of his aunts, uncle, 2 first cousins are officially diagnosed plus 2 siblings with IBS and other GI issues).

I am looking for a 'state of the art'/ review of studies kind of paper that he could go through. In particular the impact of going untreated on 'asymptomatic' Celiac sufferers, for which his hypothesis that having a minimal gluten intake( read a beer) every now and then is not going to significantly impact the outcomes( I.e. increase risk of other diseases).

Thanks for any help you can provide!

 

Can he understand those kind of papers?  Here is info from the doctors that do the research, summarized into an easy to understand format.  

 

 

 

Open Original Shared Link   under "lifetime commitment"

ArPlasma Rookie

Yes scientific papers are the way to this heart. Give him a sample description, control group, test duration, standard deviations, etc. and he will be happy( yes, evenings are fun in our household). I'm trying to find a summary of this, or may just end writing one myself if necessary.J/K( sort of?)

Thanks for the link, I have read it before but looking for some more detailed infos. I have read some other study papers on different subparts of untreated Celiac but a condensed paper with sources would work better. Thanks again!

ArPlasma Rookie

Something that might be of interest to others as well. A review of the different existing studies on complications of Celiac.

Open Original Shared Link

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Arplasma,

 

Here are a couple threads that might be interesting to you.  There are not scientific studies, but real life accounts of what happens to celiacs who cheat.  The 2nd link has  story from a woman who cheated on the diet and some pretty sever consequences.  Surgery to remove part of her intestines.

 

How bad is cheating?
https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/94443-how-bad-is-cheating-on-the-gluten-free-diet-periodically/

Falling off the gluten-free wagon Post #37
https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/67218-falling-off-the-gluten-free-wagon/?hl=%2Bfalling+%2Boff+%2Bthe+%2Bgluten-free+%2Bwagon
 

ArPlasma Rookie

Hi Arplasma,

 

Here are a couple threads that might be interesting to you.  There are not scientific studies, but real life accounts of what happens to celiacs who cheat.  The 2nd link has  story from a woman who cheated on the diet and some pretty sever consequences.  Surgery to remove part of her intestines.

 

How bad is cheating?

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/94443-how-bad-is-cheating-on-the-gluten-free-diet-periodically/

Falling off the gluten-free wagon Post #37

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/67218-falling-off-the-gluten-free-wagon/?hl=%2Bfalling+%2Boff+%2Bthe+%2Bgluten-free+%2Bwagon

Thanks GFinDC! Yikes! I have given my DH many anecdotical accounts as well as some studies. I passed him the links above, including the review paper I found yesterday, it is up to him at this point. His biopsy returned negative yesterday, again I think by now he knows the stats, talked to his GI( who thinks if not Celiac 'yet' it is highly probable to be soon)so I am hoping he comes to his own conclusions about the gluten-free diet. Our home is gluten-free at this point anyway.

Thanks again!

nvsmom Community Regular

The complications listed in this paper are pretty basic but it's guidelines from the World Gastroenterology Organisation so it's pretty agreed upon. Open Original Shared Link

This has a bunch of info too. Open Original Shared Link. But some studies are showing tht celiac disease may protect us from some cancers, so don't give him this one if he is likely to only see the upside.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,873
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CSam
    Newest Member
    CSam
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  Ask for an Erythrocyte Transketolace test for Thiamine deficiency.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
×
×
  • Create New...