Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On Test Results


Thrillrose

Recommended Posts

Thrillrose Rookie

Hi, 

I'm new to all this, my daughter who has just turned one has been given a celiac diagnosis from our paed. I just wanted your thoughts on her test results

 

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Abs   <1            (<7)

Gliadin (deamidated) IgG Abs            H16       (<7)

Immunoglobulin A (Total IgA)           0.18         (0.08-0.53)

 

So only the 1 test that came back positive. Is this enough for a celiac diagnosis? The paed referred her for an endoscopy but apparently there's quite a wait to get that done, and she even said that I may choose not to do that. The blood tests were done when she was about 10 months.

 

 

I guess I'm concerned about a complete life changing diagnosis being based on one test. Would there be any use in perhaps even repeating the blood tests?

 

Thank you!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Welcome to the board. Your daughter has a very low total IGA which would account for the negative with the first test you listed. The one test that is positive is one that is very reliable. Try not to think of this as a life changing diagnosis as much as a life saving diagnosis. You are fortunate that she has been diagnosed while so young though it probably doesn't feel that way right now. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to ask. Do be sure to test yourself and other family members even if you don't seem to have symptoms. 

Thrillrose Rookie

Welcome to the board. Your daughter has a very low total IGA which would account for the negative with the first test you listed. The one test that is positive is one that is very reliable. Try not to think of this as a life changing diagnosis as much as a life saving diagnosis. You are fortunate that she has been diagnosed while so young though it probably doesn't feel that way right now. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to ask. Do be sure to test yourself and other family members even if you don't seem to have symptoms. 

 Oh really? I didn't know that (about being the most reliable test), thank you. I've been tested and was negative. I'm about to make appointments for my other children to get the blood tests done too.

SMRI Collaborator

Welcome to the board. Your daughter has a very low total IGA which would account for the negative with the first test you listed. The one test that is positive is one that is very reliable. Try not to think of this as a life changing diagnosis as much as a life saving diagnosis. You are fortunate that she has been diagnosed while so young though it probably doesn't feel that way right now. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to ask. Do be sure to test yourself and other family members even if you don't seem to have symptoms. 

 

Maybe I'm reading this wrong due to not having enough coffee, but based on the numbers supplied, her daughter's IgA levels are in the normal range.  Also, young children often test on the low side for IgA and then that normalizes as they get a bit older.  I don't see anything out of the ordinary with her total IgA.

 

Thrillrose---with a child that young I think getting a biopsy is important.  When she starts schools, having the positive biopsy will be very important if you need accommodations in school for her.  I'm also wondering if you just got her results back or if you are just now asking questions.  That is a long time to have to wait for results.  What symptoms is your daughter having that prompted the testing?

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Maybe I'm reading this wrong due to not having enough coffee, but based on the numbers supplied, her daughter's IgA levels are in the normal range.  Also, young children often test on the low side for IgA and then that normalizes as they get a bit older.  I don't see anything out of the ordinary with her total IgA.

 

 

Actually I read it wrong. Your right that her IGA levels are in the normal range although on the low side. 

I do think the positive test is conclusive though. 

The choice on whether to biopsy or not is IMHO up to the OP. If the child's symptoms are impacting her severely and the wait is too long for the biopsy personally I would just get her on the diet. 

Thrillrose Rookie

Maybe I'm reading this wrong due to not having enough coffee, but based on the numbers supplied, her daughter's IgA levels are in the normal range.  Also, young children often test on the low side for IgA and then that normalizes as they get a bit older.  I don't see anything out of the ordinary with her total IgA.

 

Thrillrose---with a child that young I think getting a biopsy is important.  When she starts schools, having the positive biopsy will be very important if you need accommodations in school for her.  I'm also wondering if you just got her results back or if you are just now asking questions.  That is a long time to have to wait for results.  What symptoms is your daughter having that prompted the testing?

I got the results not long after testing, but I'm headed back to the paed in a couple of weeks so have been looking into the results a bit more in depth. At the time the paed gave a 99% sure this is celiacs. My daughter had been on a gluten-free diet since that day.

I guess it's kid of hard to come to terms with. I have five older children with no obvious digestive issues. There is no celiacs in my family or my husbands. It seems to have come out of the blue.

She was tested due to failure to thrive. She did not put on any weight from 6-10 months. However she was prem and is a very high energy child.

I also worry now that if we do the endoscopy it will be false negative as she will have been gluten free for at least 2-3 months.

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

You don't need a positive biopsy to get accommodations in schools, you need a positive diagnosis.  If your doctor is willing to diagnose her based on her blood tests and her (hopefully positive) response to the gluten free diet, then you are all set.  Those two things are enough to be certain, but some doctors hold out for a positive biopsy.  You could also do the endoscopy and not find damage, which will not rule out Celiac.  There could be lots of reasons why damage was not found (it could simply be missed) and already being gluten free will further compromise the results.  

 

When my son was diagnosed it felt like it was also "out of the blue" as no one in my family or my husbands had really ever heard of it.  Turns out that after looking deeper, I suspect several family members had/have it and were just never diagnosed. We also have some other autoimmune disorders in the family . . . I feel like they are all related.

 

I had all the classic symptoms for about 5 years and never considered it to be diet related.  I was seeing several different doctors for a variety of symptoms that all seemed unrelated (cardiac, neurological, GI, etc.)  When my blood test was positive, I gave up gluten and everything resolved itself.  If my son had not been diagnosed, I would have never known.

 

Most importantly:  Is the diet helping your daughter?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I got the results not long after testing, but I'm headed back to the paed in a couple of weeks so have been looking into the results a bit more in depth. At the time the paed gave a 99% sure this is celiacs. My daughter had been on a gluten-free diet since that day.

I guess it's kid of hard to come to terms with. I have five older children with no obvious digestive issues. There is no celiacs in my family or my husbands. It seems to have come out of the blue.

She was tested due to failure to thrive. She did not put on any weight from 6-10 months. However she was prem and is a very high energy child.

I also worry now that if we do the endoscopy it will be false negative as she will have been gluten free for at least 2-3 months.

She has to be eating gluten for any further testing for celiac so the endo will be a false negative if she has been gluten free. You could recheck her tests at 6 months gluten free and see if the levels went down but I think her recovery on the diet will help you to deal with the diagnosis.

As Cara mentioned not all celiacs show digestive symptoms. Some will have neuro issues, headaches, mood issues, joint and muscle problems, skin problems etc. 

Since celiac is genetic it does run in families but that doesn't mean people will always get celiac and many celiacs are misdiagnosed. 

Do be sure to read the Newbie topic at the top of the Coping page so you can learn all you need to learn to keep her safe. 

I hope you see improvement in her growth soon. 

Thrillrose Rookie

Yes the diet does seem to be helping. She has started to put on weight, quite rapidly actually. She was really tiny, below that curve they have in the books, and is now back up on that curve. Her bowel movements have become a lot more regular and are more solid now.

 

So, I guess that's my answer then right? The positive gliadin test and the improvement on the diet means that she does have celiacs. Given her age and the fact she'd need a general anaesthetic to get the endoscopy done I think I will opt out of that.

 

Thank you for your replies, I really appreciate it.

SMRI Collaborator

I got the results not long after testing, but I'm headed back to the paed in a couple of weeks so have been looking into the results a bit more in depth. At the time the paed gave a 99% sure this is celiacs. My daughter had been on a gluten-free diet since that day.

I guess it's kid of hard to come to terms with. I have five older children with no obvious digestive issues. There is no celiacs in my family or my husbands. It seems to have come out of the blue.

She was tested due to failure to thrive. She did not put on any weight from 6-10 months. However she was prem and is a very high energy child.

I also worry now that if we do the endoscopy it will be false negative as she will have been gluten free for at least 2-3 months.

 

If she is already gluten-free, skip the endoscope.

 

You don't need a positive biopsy to get accommodations in schools, you need a positive diagnosis.  If your doctor is willing to diagnose her based on her blood tests and her (hopefully positive) response to the gluten free diet, then you are all set.  Those two things are enough to be certain, but some doctors hold out for a positive biopsy.  You could also do the endoscopy and not find damage, which will not rule out Celiac.  There could be lots of reasons why damage was not found (it could simply be missed) and already being gluten free will further compromise the results.  

 

When my son was diagnosed it felt like it was also "out of the blue" as no one in my family or my husbands had really ever heard of it.  Turns out that after looking deeper, I suspect several family members had/have it and were just never diagnosed. We also have some other autoimmune disorders in the family . . . I feel like they are all related.

 

I had all the classic symptoms for about 5 years and never considered it to be diet related.  I was seeing several different doctors for a variety of symptoms that all seemed unrelated (cardiac, neurological, GI, etc.)  When my blood test was positive, I gave up gluten and everything resolved itself.  If my son had not been diagnosed, I would have never known.

 

Most importantly:  Is the diet helping your daughter?

 

Some schools will NOT do the accommodations without positive tests and endoscope--thanks to all of the "fad" dieters out there.....

 

Yes the diet does seem to be helping. She has started to put on weight, quite rapidly actually. She was really tiny, below that curve they have in the books, and is now back up on that curve. Her bowel movements have become a lot more regular and are more solid now.

 

So, I guess that's my answer then right? The positive gliadin test and the improvement on the diet means that she does have celiacs. Given her age and the fact she'd need a general anaesthetic to get the endoscopy done I think I will opt out of that.

 

Thank you for your replies, I really appreciate it.

 

Sounds like you do have your answer!  Glad to see she is improving in such a short time!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

 

 

 

Some schools will NOT do the accommodations without positive tests and endoscope--thanks to all of the "fad" dieters out there.....

 

 

 

In this case the doctor has given her a diagnosis. She is under no obligation to tell the school how the doctor arrived at the diagnosis. She just has to show them the paperwork she gets from the doctor saying the child is celiac. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    2. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    3. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    4. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    5. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.