Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused! Please Help


newjoy82

Recommended Posts

newjoy82 Rookie

I'll try to make this short... I was tested a few weeks ago via blood work for a variety of things and tested weak positive for TTG IgG. Also had low vitamin D and have low overall IGA. I had gone to the doctor because at 16 I had been diagnosed with Fibromyalgia and now almost 32 I wanted to verify that was the correct diagnosis. Based on the bloodwork the doctor said I have Celiac disease and to go on a gluten free diet. I called back for more information as from what I have read a endoscopy is how it's diagnosed. I also wanted to know if my son should be on the same diet. The doctor said the blood tests are pretty accurate, but we could do the gene blood work to give me an idea of the likelihood of my son having or developing Celiac. All of that said...I got the results back today and unless I'm completely reading them wrong I tested negative for the celiac genes. Everything I've seen online says having them doesn't mean you have celiac but not having them means you DON'T. So, what the heck??...I'm thoroughly confused now.

 

 

Celiac panel results:

GLIADIN AB, DEAMID. IgG 1.9 U/ML
NEGATIVE U/ML <20

 

GLIADIN AB, DEAMID. IgA 1.7 U/ML
NEGATIVE U/ML <20

 

TTG IgG [H] 6.2 U/ML
WEAK POSITIVE U/ML 6-9

 

TTG IgA 0.6 U/ML
NEGATIVE U/ML <4

 

 

Celiac

Tests: (1) CELIAC DISEASE GENOTYPE (5783)

Order Note: REPORT DELIVERED BY HTPN LABORATORY

Order Note: CPL Acession: VY222241

! HLA-DQA1 01:02,04:01

-------------------REFERENCE VALUE--------------------------

Not Applicable

! HLA-DQB1 04:02,06:04

Serologic Equivalent:

4,6

-------------------REFERENCE VALUE--------------------------

Not Applicable

! CELIAC GENE PAIRS PRESENT?

No

! INTERPRETATION: (NOTE)

The absence of HLA celiac permissive genes would make the

presence of celiac disease unlikely.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following results were not dispersed to the flowsheet:

HLA-DQA1, 01:02,04:01, (F)

HLA-DQB1, 04:02,06:04, (F)

CELIAC GENE PAIRS PRESENT?, No, (F)

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

Blood tests for antibodies are not perfect - I used to work in an R&D lab that developed them. Each manufacturer that develops a test chooses a value for the cutoff for positive vs negative so that most, but unfortunately not all, patient results fit with the results of biopsies taken from the same patients. Your positive result is awfully close to being a negative. With that plus the negative genetic testing, I wouldn't want to assume a diagnosis of celiac without further evaluation, i.e., repeating the blood test, an endoscopy, or improvement of symptoms and significant lowering of TTG IgG level after being on a gluten free diet.

newjoy82 Rookie

RMJ, thank you for the response...I felt a little uncomfortable with the initial diagnosis based on only the weak positive. It is a bit frustrating since I have cut out all gluten over the last couple weeks. I can't tell a difference at this point. I thought I finally had an answer and it looks like I'm back at the drawing board. I'm worried the doctor is going to say I must just be gluten intolerant and not want to investigate further.

SMRI Collaborator

When you have a low total IgA, your IgA celiac tests are not going to be accurate. Did they measure your overall IgG, including subclasses?  Without those numbers, your IgG levels might not be accurate either. I'd be suspect of your overall results as well given you do not have the common celiac genes.  There are some people that feel there are other genes that contribute to Celiac though so it's possible you have those.  I would say your next step would be a biopsy, but realize if it is not done properly or they do not take enough samples, they could miss damage as well.

newjoy82 Rookie

Hello SMRI, I had my total IgA measured by my allergy doctor right before all the blood work this doctor did. My levels were 55 and the test normal range was 90 something to 400 something.

 

Thank you for your response...I'm waiting to hear back from the doctor to discuss the results and see what she says about next steps.

SMRI Collaborator

Hello SMRI, I had my total IgA measured by my allergy doctor right before all the blood work this doctor did. My levels were 55 and the test normal range was 90 something to 400 something.

 

Thank you for your response...I'm waiting to hear back from the doctor to discuss the results and see what she says about next steps.

 

Ask if they ran your total IgG, including the IgG subclasses.  If not, you should have those done too.  It's very common if you are low IgA to also be low IgG.  If your IgG subclasses are low, it might why your ttIgG level is just barely positive.  It would also probably mean that is really higher than that.  Low IgG subclass 3 has similar symptoms as Celiac, minus the intestinal damage, so you want to differentiate between the two.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

  Low IgG subclass 3 has similar symptoms as Celiac, minus the intestinal damage, so you want to differentiate between the two.

That is interesting. Do you have a link to where you got that info?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



newjoy82 Rookie

SMRI , thank you for the information! Still waiting to hear something from the doctor. I believe total IgG was run as well and the only thing for total overall that came back low was IgA. But, I will definitly check.

 

Side note - I ate some cheesecake (with a graham cracker crust) last night and got a latte from starbucks to see what might happen... Nothing thus far. I've been off gluten for 2-3 weeks as of yesterday. I hadn't noticed any difference in symptoms while off gluten...i do realize some celiacs don't have typical symptoms and it can take time. But, I was curious to see if it would have any affect.

SMRI Collaborator

That is interesting. Do you have a link to where you got that info?

 

I could probably dig one up or you can search for immune deficiency and info on the subclasses for IgG.  My daughter has this so that is how I know about it.  Low IgG subclasses and low IgA is called CVID, Chronic Variable Immune Deficiency.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,694
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    VJM
    Newest Member
    VJM
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Gigi2025
      Since 2015 we've spent extensive time in Italy and I've been able to eat their wheat products without incident. Initially, I was practically starving thinking foods in Sicily were not gluten-free.  An Italian friend who had lived in the US for over 20 years said she had celiac/gluten-free friends from the US who could eat Italian wheat products without problems. Hesitantly, I tried little by little without issues.  A few years later at a market, I asked a bread vendor if they had gluten-free loaves. Turns out she had lived in LA, said groups believe it's not the gluten that's causing our bodies harm, but potassium bromate; these groups have been trying to ban it.  Bromines and other halogens wreaks havoc to our endocrine system and, more specifically, our thyroids and immune systems. When bromines are ingested/absorbed into the body, it displaces iodine causing other health issues. Potassium bromate is a powerful oxidizing agent (dough 'conditioner') that chemically changes flour to enhance elasticity, bleaches the dough, and ages the flour much faster than open air.   Shortly thereafter while visiting friends in California, one family said they had gone gluten-free and the difference was incredible. The reason they choose this path was due them (a biologist/chemist/agriculturist scientist) having to write a portion of a paper about a certain product for the company he worked. Another company's scientist was directed to write the other portion. All was confidential, they weren't allowed to know the other company/employee.  After the research, they learned gluten was being removed from wheat, sent elsewhere, returned in large congealed blocks resembling tofu, and then added to wheat products. Potassium bromate has been banned for use in Europe, China, and other countries, but not in the US. Then we have the issues of shelf preservatives and stabilizers. What are we eating?  Why? We spend long periods of time in Italy and all has been good.  We just returned from an extended time in Greece;  no issues there either.  There is a man there we learned about on a travel show about Greece who walks the hills, picking herbs, pods, etc.  He is a very learned scholar, taught at the university level in Melbourne. It took a few days to locate him, but were finally successful. He too, is concerned about the additives and preservatives in American food (many of his customers are Americans, haven't been in the best of health, and have become healthier after visiting him). He suggested taking a food product from the US and the same product in Europe, and compare the different ingredients. Then ask why these things are being allowed in the US by the 'watch dog' of our foods and drugs. It would be amuzing if it weren't tragic. I'm presently looking for flour from Europe that I can make my own bread and pasta as the gluten-free bread is now $7.99 a (small) loaf.  BTW, studies are showing that many gluten-free individuals are becoming diabetic. My guess is because the gluten-free products are high in carbs. This is only my experience and opinion garnished by my personal research.  I hope it helps.  
    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.