Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Frustration of no clear diagnosis after months


Sterling

Recommended Posts

Sterling Rookie

I am now six months into test. Here is the position so far:

Mild anaemia otherwise asymptomatic / Ttg IgA positive 27.5 U/ml (range 0.6 to 6.9), positive again on recent re-test / Endomysial antibody IgA level: not detected / Genetic tests: positive / Endoscopy with six biopsies all negative / Colonoscopy: no concerns. Gastroenterologist  suggested results not clear line but most probably non-coeliac. 

I met a specialist coeliac consultant today who has called for all blood tests again and indicates that a further endoscopy may be required looking deeper into the intestine. This consultant stated that I am definitely on the "coeliac spectrum".   

Please, does this fit anyone else's pattern?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Celiac Nutritionist Newbie

Do you have a copy of your pathology biopsy report?        

Yes?   What exactly does it state?     (ie: does it have any atrophy or duodenitis stated on the report?)

No? - Ask your doctor for a copy.

Is the pathologist unfamiliar with Celiac Disease? (this could potentially effect the results).

Sterling Rookie
On 09/01/2016 at 6:23 AM, Celiac Nutritionist said:

Do you have a copy of your pathology biopsy report?        

Yes?   What exactly does it state?     (ie: does it have any atrophy or duodenitis stated on the report?)

No? - Ask your doctor for a copy.

Is the pathologist unfamiliar with Celiac Disease? (this could potentially effect the results).

Thank you, Celiac Nutritionist, for taking you time to respond to my posting.

The gastroscopy indicates duodenum normal. Two biopsies taken at the "bulb" and four biopsies taken at the "second part". I do not have the pathology report. But I was told that the biopsies were normal.

The gastrologist has passed me over to a coeliac consultant. The immediate view is that I am unquestionably on the "coceliac spectrum". Now all blood tests have been re-ordered and a deeper endoscopy may be required.

So even after 12 months of investigation, I am being instructed to continue of consume gluten until investigations are complete. At some point I may just decide to go on the coeliac diet.

Kind regards, Sterling

 

  

 

  

Celiac Nutritionist Newbie

Hi, Sterling.

 

If it's possible - try and find out through your reports if there is ANY percentage of villi atrophy.    Glad you are seeing a gluten consultant, is it at one of the celiac centres?

Sterling Rookie
On 12/01/2016 at 6:04 AM, Celiac Nutritionist said:

nd find out through your reports if there is ANY percentage of villi atrophy.    Glad you are seeing a glute

I have recently been treated privately but my case has been referred to specialists within the English National Health Service (NHS). It is very difficult to get detailed results sheets when under NHS care. When you pay you can get what you ask for.

However, today they confirm a diagnosis of Coeliac Disease notwithstanding normal biopsies. However, they want me to follow a harsher gluten diet for 6 to 8 weeks and then have an enteroscopy investigation with jejunal biopsies. They  expect that they would confirm coeliac disease with the biopsies deeper into the  intestine.

They surprisingly seem to be very intent upon finding positive biopsies.

 

 

 

squirmingitch Veteran

So you're saying they say you do have celiac disease based on the positive blood work twice now. I understand they say the biopsies are negative. And you're saying they want you to eat even greater quantities of gluten for 6-8 weeks & then repeat the endoscopy with biopsies but they want to go deeper in the intestine.

Assuming I have everything right there then they must be trying to go on the "old standard" of the "gold standard" for diagnosis is positive biopsies. Am I right?

I know you hate eating more gluten for longer yet but if that's what it takes for the NHS then I guess that's what it takes. I'm so sorry they are putting you through this. You're so close at this point I would hate to see you back off now. It certainly sounds like they're trying.

Sterling Rookie
12 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

So you're saying they say you do have celiac disease based on the positive blood work twice now. I understand they say the biopsies are negative. And you're saying they want you to eat even greater quantities of gluten for 6-8 weeks & then repeat the endoscopy with biopsies but they want to go deeper in the intestine.

Assuming I have everything right there then they must be trying to go on the "old standard" of the "gold standard" for diagnosis is positive biopsies. Am I right?

I know you hate eating more gluten for longer yet but if that's what it takes for the NHS then I guess that's what it takes. I'm so sorry they are putting you through this. You're so close at this point I would hate to see you back off now. It certainly sounds like they're trying.

Thank you, squirmingitch

This is pretty much where I stand after a great many investigations except that I have had the endoscopy and the colonsocopy and it is an enteroscopy that is proposed. The celiac experts are absolutely certain that I have celiac disease based upon now two repeats of a wide variety of blood tests despite the normal  biopsies. So the "gold standard" is not so gold.  They want jejunal biopsies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

Thank you for clarifying that. Well. My goodness. I can only give you my opinion - you have to make your own decision. 

SINCE the celiac experts are absolutely certain you have celiac disease then you could propose to them that you don't want to eat gluten any longer just to satisfy their desire to poke around inside you any more. You can tell them that you are going gluten free right now & instead of jejunal biopsies they can judge on your response to the gluten free diet. They are already convinced of your dx so screw them. Personally, I wouldn't be their guinea pig any longer. 

Sterling Rookie
1 hour ago, squirmingitch said:

Thank you for clarifying that. Well. My goodness. I can only give you my opinion - you have to make your own decision. 

SINCE the celiac experts are absolutely certain you have celiac disease then you could propose to them that you don't want to eat gluten any longer just to satisfy their desire to poke around inside you any more. You can tell them that you are going gluten free right now & instead of jejunal biopsies they can judge on your response to the gluten free diet. They are already convinced of your dx so screw them. Personally, I wouldn't be their guinea pig any longer. 

I think, squirmingitch, that you well understand my frustration.

The overseeing consultant at the university hospital that I am attending is a leading celiac researcher so the approach in my instance may well be non-standard. I have considered just calling it a day and moving onto the non-gluten diet, but this is tempered by my concern that I should know if there are smaller intestine changes. I keep thinking that I am coming to the end of the tests.    

squirmingitch Veteran

Ahhhhhhhh, I begin to see more clearly now. 

"The overseeing consultant at the university hospital that I am attending is a leading celiac researcher"

This makes one wonder if his motives are entirely altruistic or whether they are influenced by the desire to put a feather in his own cap & write a paper on this. 

Hey, nevermind me, I am admittedly jaded and a bit rebellious:rolleyes: to boot.

IMHO, for them to ask you to do this, they OWE you full disclosure by presenting all the results of ALL the testing including the pathology reports of the endoscopy they performed. After all, it is you who are risking your health not them. Perhaps you could have a "sit down" with the overseer and relate this line of reasoning to him. 

I DO understand where you are coming from as well but I still think you should have access to all the lab work so you can make a fully informed decision. 

I wish you well my friend & support you no matter what you decide and hope you can come to a decision without second guessing yourself. 

Please let us know how it goes. 

mommida Enthusiast

There are two things that stand out for current research.  Zonulin levels, which are showing up in non-celiac individuals who are reacting to gluten.  Eosinophilic Gastro Intestinal Disorders (EGID)- linked to Celiac disease especially if gluten is a "trigger" the individual.  (but eosinophil levels should have been screened by the pathologists in your biopsy samples- and damage can be seen during the scoping (unless the damage is deeper)

While I don't want you to be a human guinea pig (also known as a Cavy), I do want you to be correctly diagnosed so you can get healthy.  If there is any eosinophil involvement, there may be more than one trigger (gluten) that is making you ill.  If you decide not to further test, I urge you to keep a food journal.  The journal may help you track down any other further food intolerances and keep you on a healthy track in your diet.  When you are hungry and the only gluten free item you can find is a bag of potato chips -well you have to be more proactive planning out a healthy gluten free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    2. - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    3. - knitty kitty replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    4. - lizzie42 replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Son's legs shaking

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Russ H's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,870
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KABoston
    Newest Member
    KABoston
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests for thiamine are unreliable.  The nutrients from your food get absorbed into the bloodstream and travel around the body.  So, a steak dinner can falsely raise thiamine blood levels in the following days.  Besides, thiamine is utilized inside cells where stores of thiamine are impossible to measure. A better test to ask for is the Erythrocyte Transketolace Activity test.  But even that test has been questioned as to accuracy.  It is expensive and takes time to do.   Because of the discrepancies with thiamine tests and urgency with correcting thiamine deficiency, the World Health Organization recommends giving thiamine for several weeks and looking for health improvement.  Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.   Many doctors are not given sufficient education in nutrition and deficiency symptoms, and may not be familiar with how often they occur in Celiac disease.  B12 and Vitamin D can be stored for as long as a year in the liver, so not having deficiencies in these two vitamins is not a good indicator of the status of the other seven water soluble B vitamins.  It is possible to have deficiency symptoms BEFORE there's changes in the blood levels.   Ask your doctor about Benfotiamine, a form of thiamine that is better absorbed than Thiamine Mononitrate.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many vitamins because it is shelf-stable, a form of thiamine that won't break down sitting around on a store shelf.  This form is difficult for the body to turn into a usable form.  Only thirty percent is absorbed in the intestine, and less is actually used.   Thiamine interacts with all of the other B vitamins, so they should all be supplemented together.  Magnesium is needed to make life sustaining enzymes with thiamine, so a magnesium supplement should be added if magnesium levels are low.   Thiamine is water soluble, safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  There's no harm in trying.
    • lizzie42
      Neither of them were anemic 6 months after the Celiac diagnosis. His other vitamin levels (d, B12) were never low. My daughters levels were normal after the first 6 months. Is the thiamine test just called thiamine? 
    • knitty kitty
      Yes, I do think they need a Thiamine supplement at least. Especially since they eat red meat only occasionally. Most fruits and vegetables are not good sources of Thiamine.  Legumes (beans) do contain thiamine.  Fruits and veggies do have some of the other B vitamins, but thiamine B 1 and  Cobalamine B12 are mostly found in meats.  Meat, especially organ meats like liver, are the best sources of Thiamine, B12, and the six other B vitamins and important minerals like iron.   Thiamine has antibacterial and antiviral properties.  Thiamine is important to our immune systems.  We need more thiamine when we're physically ill or injured, when we're under stress emotionally, and when we exercise, especially outside in hot weather.  We need thiamine and other B vitamins like Niacin B 3 to keep our gastrointestinal tract healthy.  We can't store thiamine for very long.  We can get low in thiamine within three days.  Symptoms can appear suddenly when a high carbohydrate diet is consumed.  (Rice and beans are high in carbohydrates.)  A twenty percent increase in dietary thiamine causes an eighty percent increase in brain function, so symptoms can wax and wane depending on what one eats.  The earliest symptoms like fatigue and anxiety are easily contributed to other things or life events and dismissed.   Correcting nutritional deficiencies needs to be done quickly, especially in children, so their growth isn't stunted.  Nutritional deficiencies can affect intelligence.  Vitamin D deficiency can cause short stature and poor bone formation.   Is your son taking anything for the anemia?  Is the anemia caused by B12 or iron deficiency?  
    • lizzie42
      Thank you! That's helpful. My kids eat very little processed food. Tons of fruit, vegetables, cheese, eggs and occasional red meat. We do a lot of rice and bean bowls, stir fry, etc.  Do you think with all the fruits and vegetables they need a vitamin supplement? I feel like their diet is pretty healthy and balanced with very limited processed food. The only processed food they eat regularly is a bowl of Cheerios here and there.  Could shaking legs be a symptom of just a one-time gluten exposure? I guess there's no way to know for sure if they're getting absolutely zero exposure because they do go to school a couple times a week. We do homeschool but my son does a shared school 2x a week and my daughter does a morning Pre-K 3 x a week.  At home our entire house is strictly gluten free and it is extremely rare for us to eat out. If we eat at someone else's house I usually just bring their food. When we have play dates we bring all the snacks, etc. I try to be really careful since they're still growing. They also, of course, catch kids viruses all the time so I  want to make sure I know whether they're just sick or they've had gluten. It can be pretty confusing when they're pretty young to even be explaining their symptoms! 
    • Scott Adams
      That is interesting, and it's the first time I heard about the umbilical cord beings used for that test. Thanks for sharing!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.