Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Wheat sensitivity but not Barley?


atheresa

Recommended Posts

atheresa Rookie

I drank a couple of Best Damn Root beers before I realized they were not gluten free. They are brewed with barley. I have been gluten free 2 1/2 years now because I have bad gastro problems, migraines and depression when I eat wheat. I was just wondering if it is possible to be only reacting to wheat and not barley, or what might be going on. Is it possible I could drink real beer and not have any side effects? I wanted some opinions before I go for a trial run that could ruin the next couple of days.

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Do you have Celiac disease?  If you do than, NO, you can't drink regular beer, etc.  not reacting to the barley was just lucky.

If you don't have Celiac....why not?  Maybe you don't need to be gluten-free at all.  Maybe whatever your issue was has resolved itself.

 

 

 

 

atheresa Rookie
9 hours ago, kareng said:

Do you have Celiac disease?  If you do than, NO, you can't drink regular beer, etc.  not reacting to the barley was just lucky.

If you don't have Celiac....why not?  Maybe you don't need to be gluten-free at all.  Maybe whatever your issue was has resolved itself.

 

 

 

 

I don't have celiac. I just know that when I eat gluten I get migraines, depression and diahrea. Any time I have been accidentally been glutened in the past 2 years, I have a couple of really bad days. Also, my energy level has increased without gluten. Is it possible for a gluten sensitivity to resolve itself? That would be amazing news. I would love to go back to eating regular foods but I have not heard of that happening. I just wondered if anyone ever heard of anyone that was just sensitive to wheat but not other grains.

 

Jmg Mentor

Hi Atheresa,

Take a look at this page: Open Original Shared Link

It outlines not only celiac but other ways in which wheat or gluten can affect people and suggests that some can eat barley, rye etc without suffering the same effects. (Gluten is the protein within wheat. For Celiacs the protein in Rye, Barley, Spelt and Triticale are similar enough to gluten to cause a reaction.) 

Quote

 

People with wheat intolerance will still experience adverse symptoms from gluten free products, as the remaining part of the wheat will be affecting them. They may, or may not, be able to eat rye, barley and oats, that are part of the wheat family and, as with many other food intolerances, may be able to reintroduce wheat back into the diet after a period of elimination.


 

If your doctors have clinically excluded Celiac (very important) and you just want to avoid ill effects that you experience then it sounds like you aren't reacting to the barley, so maybe it's ok for you.  There are those who think that a gluten sensitivity may be reversible perhaps by exposure to degraded gluten protein:

Open Original Shared Link

Quote

For those with a less severe reaction, with what Pollan calls “gluten intolerance”, which is more commonly known as non-celiac gluten sensitivity, the sourdough process may increase tolerance for consuming the bread, says Alessio Fasano, 

I would sound one note of caution. I had negative blood test and biopsy, my GI told me to avoid gluten based solely on my reactions to it. So I'm not celiac. However, about a year or so into the gluten free diet I reacted to a relatively small amount of barley malt in a cereal product. So either I have latent celiac which went undetected under biopsy, or it's possible for non celiac gluten intolerant people to react to barley as well as wheat. 

Ultimately we all have to make our own decisions. I have enough correlation to keep me strictly gluten free for life. But there's clearly a wide variety of folks out there and maybe you're lucky enough to be able to consume some previously forbidden foods without ill effect. Just be very sure that celiac is definitively excluded or you could be incurring very serious damage, even without perceptible symptoms.

One final link (trigger warning - includes delicious looking beer :( ) 

 

Best of luck! :)

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.