Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused on test results


Deades

Recommended Posts

Deades Contributor

I did not have a blood test.  Had the scope looking for a stomach ulcer.  One doctor says I have celiac and another says no.  What do you think?

Here are the notes from my endoscopy:

Mild chronic duodenitis with mild to moderate villus blunting compatible with changes related to celiac disease in the appropriate clinical and endoscopic setting.  No dysplasia or malignancy identified.

Stomach Antrim biopsy:. Gastric mucosa with minimal inflammation. No dysplasia or malignancy identified.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

While it is a shame that your doctor did not order a celiac blood test (are you sure?), he did find villi damage.  This can occur for many reasons but the predominant one is celiac disease.  You were anemic and had osteoporosis at the time of your diagnosis.  It is too soon for to for a bone scan, but how is your anemia?  Improved on a gluten free diet?  That should confirm the diagnosis and set your mind at ease.

If you look at the history of celiac disease, biopsies came first, long before blood tests. 

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

Deades Contributor

There was no blood test for celiac because he was looking for a stomach ulcer.  Celiac was not even a thought at the time. I have always been anemic but my red blood cell count was also low.  I am scheduled to see the doctor in midSeptember and will have my first blood test to check on iron levels prior to that visit.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I have been anemic my entire life.  It was always blamed on my being a women and Thalassemia (genetic anemia), but I also had iron-deficiency anemia that waxed and waned.  Since I have been gluten-free for four years, my iron-deficiency anemia is long resolved!  I still have Thals, but my body has long adapted.   I am not ever going to win the Senior Olympics, but I can hold my own!  

My ferritin levels did go up with my three month check-up.  Since my hubby had been gluten-free for 12 years prior, I knew the diet well.  If your results are not perfect, give yourself more time.  The learning curve for the gluten-free diet is steep.  

It took much longer for other "hidden" issues to resolve (fractures, neuropathy, food intolerances, etc.).  

  • 3 weeks later...
ironictruth Proficient

Ok, I am looking through your old posts now after commenting on your recent one.

Ditto with cycling lady. Shame on them for not ordering the freaking celiac panel. Why would they not order it after the scope to confirm?

Will your insurance at least cover the genetic test? 30% of the population has the gene and only a small percentage develop celiac. However, at least you would know if you had a low or high risk gene. It might make you feel more confident in the diagnosis, especially having a doc tell you he thought the diagnosis of celiac was perhaps not correct.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Florence Lillian's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Gluten-Mimicking Proteins that can affect some Celiac individuals.

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Second chance

    3. - Scott Adams replied to elisejunker44's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Schar's products contain wheat!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,601
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dale S
    Newest Member
    Dale S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.