Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow-up labs - Accurate???


TexasJen

Recommended Posts

TexasJen Collaborator

Here's an interesting article from Gastroenterology this month......

Open Original Shared Link

"This meta-analysis demonstrates the limitations of celiac antibody testing as a surrogate marker for mucosal recovery in persons with celiac disease on a GFD."

"Recommendations to monitor tTG and/or EMA anti- bodies endure because there are no other validated sensi- tive measures that predict mucosal recovery."

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I have read that article.  While, true, testing for antibodies seems to be better than nothing.  I have read the DGP may be better for monitoring the gluten free diet, but who knows if that is still true or not?  Endoscopies are invasive and not cost effective for constant follow-up care.  

I would like to see more studies about healing outcomes for celiac disease.  Most information is based on clinical observation and just plain guessing.  While my hubby can take a hit that lasts a week, I go down for months!  I am assuming that there are variations of celiac disease, like diabetes.  You just have to find what works for you as an individual.  Follow the basic gluten free diet, but modify it for your personal level of sensitivity and accompanying food intolerances.  I wish there was a meter for my sensitivity.  I can sure identify which carbohydrates can spike my blood sugar.  Those carbohydrates that affect me do not necessarily affect other diabetics.  

I am approaching five years of being gluten free.   I am constantly debating on whether I should get another endoscopy.  (My GI just said to email him directly and he'll squeeze me in within days).   But what will the results reveal?  That I keep making mistakes, am getting cross contamination from hidden sources, that I have refractory celiac disease or lymphoma or I am doing a good job?  I have chosen to move forward, stick to the diet and just simply live and enjoy my life.   

Of course I say this after coming down from a six month bad stretch (tooth infection, flu, colds, daily hives, antibodies raised for both Hashi's and DGP).  Life has been good for the past month despite my family's crazy schedule.  I am going to take it!  

Gemini Experienced

I think, at least from my personal experience, that these tests are accurate if you were diagnosed including blood work that was positive.  All of the tests on my panel were positive by large numbers at diagnosis and over the next year, they went to very low normal for the ranges given.  My GI symptoms were gone by then and the lingering neuro ones took longer to heal but they did. I would assume in a highly symptomatic Celiac, that resolution of symptoms, normalization of the blood work and weight gain would indicate healing.  Whether I am 100% healed or not doesn't matter as my health is far better today than it was in my youth.  I have not developed any more AI diseases than the 4 I already have and I call that a big win.

I think doctors do not take into account enough symptom resolution, weight gain for the skinny Celiac's or weight loss for those on the opposite end of the spectrum, as important markers for healing.  I am not even sure if it is totally necessary for a person to heal 100% as there is overlap in the small intestine and nutrients are absorbed not in just one place, making it a brilliant design, when you think of it.  If your health has improved dramatically on the gluten-free diet, along with the other things mentioned, then consider yourself healed well enough that you've regained your health back.  Repeat endoscopy's are really for those still having problems.

TexasJen Collaborator

Yes!  The designer did a good job with the human body. It never ceases to amaze me.

I am certainly not advocating for follow up endoscopies. I posted it only for information.

For me, I see people advocating for followup labs if you are still having unusual symptoms to see if it could be the celiac. But according to this study, if the labs are negative, it might mean nothing. Your symptoms could still be from celiac even though the labs are negative.

I was diagnosed a year ago and have some residual symptoms (arthritis) and have some new symptoms (terrible reflux) and had assumed it probably wasn't the celiac since my labs are negative.  It only leaves me wondering if I am not doing a good enough job or if I have regular arthritis and the reflux is from something else.  It is frustrating to say the least.....

But, I can at least take this into consideration.....

Gemini Experienced
1 hour ago, TexasJen said:

Yes!  The designer did a good job with the human body. It never ceases to amaze me.

I am certainly not advocating for follow up endoscopies. I posted it only for information.

For me, I see people advocating for followup labs if you are still having unusual symptoms to see if it could be the celiac. But according to this study, if the labs are negative, it might mean nothing. Your symptoms could still be from celiac even though the labs are negative.

I was diagnosed a year ago and have some residual symptoms (arthritis) and have some new symptoms (terrible reflux) and had assumed it probably wasn't the celiac since my labs are negative.  It only leaves me wondering if I am not doing a good enough job or if I have regular arthritis and the reflux is from something else.  It is frustrating to say the least.....

But, I can at least take this into consideration.....

I did not discover or begin to have problems with dairy until 2 years post diagnosis, when I was doing relatively well.  It could be that I felt so bad in the beginning that I attributed everything to Celiac.  Kind of odd on the timing but after 12 years, I have accepted that I will never be able to eat ice cream or drink milk in anything milk based with out paying for it big time.  It no longer appeals to me. I guess it might be from long term undiagnosed Celiac and my villi haven't all completely healed, but I am healthy enough in every other way that I don't care. 

Arthritis is so common in so many, it could be just arthritis that you would have gotten anyway.  Reflux is tricky, though.  It can be from so many things and could be from a structural problem with the sphincter muscle. I hope you find the cause and put that one behind you.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,577
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Catchik9
    Newest Member
    Catchik9
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Trina Zee
      Thank you!  I appreciate this
    • Rejoicephd
      Thank you very much @trents! This is super helpful. The only time I wasn’t sick after my diagnosis was when I was ordering and eating certified gluten-free meals from a company. I did that for a few months right after being diagnosed and then I started to try to figure it out how to cool and eat gluten-free meals myself. I think I’m probably getting low levels of gluten exposure and maybe that’s what’s making me ill. Possibly other things also not helping the situation (like dairy). Anyway this gives me something to focus on to see if it helps. So thanks for that!
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com, @Rejoicephd! 1. "Gluten Free" does not equate to "contains no gluten". According to FDA advertising regulations, it means it cannot contain more than 20ppm of gluten. This is a good standard for most in the celiac community but not good enough for those on the sensitive end of the spectrum. If you find the "Certified Gluten Free" symbol on a package that is even better, indicating that there is no more than 10ppm of gluten.  2. When you are choosing "gluten free" items from a restaurant, realize that it only means gluten is not an intentional ingredient. It does not rule out CC (Cross Contamination) caused by those cooking and preparing the food back in the kitchen who may be cooking it on the same surfaces or in the same pots/pans as they are gluten containing food items and handling it with the same utensils they are handling gluten-containing food. 3. About 8% of celiacs react to the protein avenin in oats as they do the protein gluten in wheat/barley/rye. In addition, some cultivars of oats actually contain the protein gluten. Many celiacs also react to the protein casein in dairy products as they do gluten or they are lactose intolerant. Eggs, soy and corn are also common "cross reactors" in the celiac community but oats and dairy are the most common.
    • Rejoicephd
      Hi everyone! I was diagnosed with celiac a year ago (they confirmed it on endoscopy following a positive TTG antibody and positive genetic test). I thought the gluten free diet thing wasn’t going to be that hard of an adjustment, but man was I wrong. I’m a year in and still having issues in terms of accidentally glutening myself and getting super sick (I’m starting to think I need to just bring my own food everywhere I go). And also even when I am eating foods that say they are gluten free, I’m still dealing with an upset stomach often. My GI doc said I should avoid dairy as well, and the internal medicine doc said my gut microbiome might be messed up from all of this. I’m just looking for some answers/ideas/tips on what additional things I can do to feel better. Do you all do avoid additional categories of foods beyond just gluten to help alleviate symptoms? Thanks! 
    • trents
      If your total IGA is low then the values for the other IGA tests cannot be trusted. They will be depressed. Celiacs who have the DQ2 gene typically are on the more sensitive side as opposed to those who only have the DQ8. But keep in mind that having either or both of those genes does not equate to having celiac disease as 40% of the general population have one or the other and only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. Genetic typing can be used for ruling it out, however. Because of the low total IGA, symptoms and the possession of the DQ2 gene, my suggestion would be for you to go seriously gluten free for a few months and see if your symptoms improve. It may be the only way you can ascertain if you are gluten intolerant because of the low total IGA.
×
×
  • Create New...