Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Positive, Biopsy Negative


Kasaplatt

Recommended Posts

Kasaplatt Newbie

I've been dealing with digestive issues, extreme fatigue, anxiety, depression, and brain fog for a while, nearly 3 years if I'll be honest. Digestive issues primarily in the last year and a half. I switched PCP's and the new doctor tested me for Celiac. The blood test came back positive. But, the biopsy I later had came back negative. Only one specimen was tested. After the biopsy, before the results, the GI specialist told me I could start my gluten free diet. 

So, I've been on a gluten free diet for three weeks. My digestive issues have improved greatly. Stools are starting to look normal again, and my energy is getting better every day, and the brain fog feels like it is lifting. 

Deductive reasoning tells me that if I have a positive blood test, negative biopsy, but show positive results on a gluten free diet that I have Celiac Disease. I'm waiting on word from my PCP about what this means for the Celiac Disease diagnosis, but welcome your thoughts! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

Yes, positive blood & positive results on a gluten free diet -- you got it! Here's the problem -- the GI only took ONE biopsy???!!!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!! The small intestine, when flayed open & spread out, will cover a tennis court. 1 biopsy has such little chance of hitting the sweet spot where the damage is. There are supposed to be a minimum of 6 biopsies so you got cheated by 5. I don't know what your docs are going to say about an official dx of celiac b/c the GI screwed up so badly. You would have to go back on gluten for a minimum of 2 weeks & get another endoscopy, done right this time, & I bet you would have positive biopsies but I certainly can't blame you for not wanting to go that route!

Do you have copies of your celiac blood panel results & reference ranges & the pathology report from the endoscopy? Could you post them here?

lyfan Contributor

ONE biopsy? Considering the expense and inconvenience of the whole procedure, one has to ask "Why just one?" Sadly, professional skills are always questionable. You might want to ask them what they actually SAW in the endoscopy and why they only chose one, perhaps everything looked so good and normal that they felt no more were needed. ASK.
 Biopsy interpretation is also often very subjective, you can ask to have the sample (or digital photographs of it, which should have been taken) reviewed by someone else. Often one expert will say "Normal" and another will say "Grossly abnormal..." and it depends on the skill of the interpreter.

 In the meantime, if a gluten-free diet makes you feel better--do it. Probiotics like PB-8 will often make a difference. It is only recently that gut biomes and probiotics have even been recognized as having a major role in these things. There are also "non celiac gluten sensitivity" cases, where a celiac diet is the effective solution, even though Celiac is not confirmed as the cause. Getting to the real experts, and getting their best opinions, is not always easy. never be afraid to ask "Why?" or "What?" and the really good docs will always be glad to explain and answer. If they don't have time for that--find a different doc.

 Go back a mere 20 years, and there may have been six doctors in the whole world who had any grasp of Celiac. One in Australia, one in Japan, maybe two in the US....This is all new medicine, and only recently having any real research with not many answers, yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,425
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kermeling
    Newest Member
    Kermeling
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      @dmallbee, about 8% of celiacs react to the oat protein avenin like they do to the wheat protein gluten. In addition, there are some cultivars of oats that apparently do actually contain gluten.
    • dmallbee
      I was diagnosed at 18 months old with celiac and lived without wheat, rye, oats, and barley as instructed by my doctor, Dr. Katz at Boston Children's Hospital in the 60's and 70's. I don't agree nor recommend doctors removing oats from restriction, certified gluten-free or not.  I have eaten certified gluten free oats and have had the usual reactions to gluten.  Please reconsider this with newly diagnosed patients. 
    • bold-95
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that the trip went well, and the general consensus I hear about gluten-free travel in Europe, including my own experiences, is that it is much easier done in comparison to traveling and eating gluten-free in the USA. 
    • CJF
      Safely home from my recent trip to the UK. I had zero gut issues while traveling around this pretty country. Our tour leader was very good at making sure the 2 of us with gluten issues on our tour were well taken care of.  We often got our meals before the rest of the group and adaptations to the menu for us were well thought out and very tasty. I just wish restaurants here in the USA took as much pride in making food that everyone can enjoy. Many of the hotels and pubs we ate at had numerous options that were safe for us with wheat/gluten restrictions to eat.  
×
×
  • Create New...