Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question About Biopsys And Blood Test


Guest tracey and emma

Recommended Posts

Guest tracey and emma

hi everyone emma had a biopsy done a few weeks ago and with her symtoms as well they have told me that they suspect celiac disease. but today they got the results of the bood test. and it came back normal. with no evedence of C/D at all. what they are saying is that this is just the on set of C/D as her villi were normal to look at as well. so hear the question....... does the blood test always come back postive to celiac if that is what it is, or is it hit and miss? in other words can the bloods in the early stages come back as normal, even though it might still be C/D? any help would be greatful as emma cons is now on holiday for the next few weeks and i am really confused as to what to think? and our dietician just said stick for the time being to gluten free, and we will talk again in the new year. thanks for your help tracey and emma X X X


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VydorScope Proficient
hi everyone emma had a biopsy done a few weeks ago and with her symtoms as well they have told me that they suspect celiac disease. but today they got the results of the bood test. and it came back normal. with no evedence of C/D at all. what they are saying is that this is just the on set of C/D as her villi were normal to look at as well. so hear the question....... does the blood test always come back postive to celiac if that is what it is, or is it hit and miss? in other words can the bloods in the early stages come back as normal, even though it might still be C/D? any help would be greatful as emma cons is now on holiday for the next few weeks and i am really confused as to what to think? and our dietician just said stick for the time being to gluten free, and we will talk again in the new year. thanks for your help tracey and emma X X X

How old is the child? In real small childern the tests do not seem to a be all that realiable. The Bispoy needs a signifgnat amount of damage be done before it has a good chance to succed in finding celiac disease, and litle ones normaly will not have that much damage built up thats to there extremly awsome healing powers. Simular issue with the blood test.

IMO, the response to the diet is the best indicator....

Guest tracey and emma
How old is the child? In real small childern the tests do not seem to a be all that realiable. The Bispoy needs a signifgnat amount of damage be done before it has a good chance to succed in finding celiac disease, and litle ones normaly will not have that much damage built up thats to there extremly awsome healing powers. Simular issue with the blood test.

IMO, the response to the diet is the best indicator....

emma is 2 1/2years old the biopsys came back as haveing a problem in the intestine and they were convinced that they were consitatant with C/D. but would not confirm on this test alone. is this normal to? tracey and thanks

VydorScope Proficient
emma is 2 1/2years old the biopsys came back as haveing a problem in the intestine and they were convinced that they were consitatant with C/D. but would not confirm on this test alone. is this normal to? tracey and thanks

In my epxerence pediatric GI's are very gun shy about calling it celiac disease. My son was 18mos old when he got his bisopy done.

Let me say this, IMO, if you see postive results from the diet, ingore the testing.

That aside, typicaly in adults a postive biopsy is considered teh "gold standard" in America to dx celiac disease. So if your child was 20 years older, I would say NO thats not normal, but at his age, its a bit harder to tell. I would say that it is probably an overly cautius GI doc and your son problaby has it, BUT I AM NOT A DOCTOR.

You were advised to stay on the gluten-free dfiet with him, and I completely agree with that. If you see a postive change with it , then you have your answer, IMO. :D

Guest nini

positive dietary response is the most reliable indicator. blood tests and biopsy's can only confirm a dx of celiac, they cannot completely rule it out because it may be in the early stages, there may not be enough damage to show up in blood tests yet, the villi may not be damaged yet or they didn't take enough samples from enough areas.

I have to say ITA with Vincent... keep your child on the diet and monitor her progress... my daughter's blood work was negative or inconclusive, she DID NOT have a biopsy because her Dr. wouldn't even consider it (besides I didn't think it was neccessary) but she responded miraculously to the diet, and has horrible reactions when accidentally exposed to gluten. SO, I have my answer, and it looks like you will have yours if she shows improvement on the gluten-free diet.

VydorScope Proficient
I have to say ITA with Vincent...

:huh: what is "ITA" ? :mellow:

Guest nini

ITA = I Totally Agree :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.