Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results?


sunny13

Recommended Posts

sunny13 Newbie

I have been on medication (Robinul Forte) for Irritable Bowel Syndrome for the last 2 months. In the meantime I was tested for both a thyroid condition and Celiac's Disease. I don't have the test results in hand but I know that 2 out of the 3 things tested for concerning Celiac's reflect weak positive results. The 3rd was negative. Basically, my doctor said that he does not know whether I have Celiac's. He said that my options are to either continuing taking the medication for Irritable Bowel or try the Gluten-Free Diet. It seems that my symptoms have been somewhat better while on the medication, however, I do not want to take medication for the rest of my life. Any information would be greatly appreciated? Could the fact that 2 of these things tested for reflect gluten sensitivity rather than actual Celiac's disease? Do most of the people with the disease test positive for all 3 of the antibodies? I understand that the Gluten free diet is difficult to maintain, but if my stomach problems are something I can control naturally -- I am all for it!

Thank You -- this site is very helpful!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest jhmom

My doctor tried to diagnose me with IBS too but I would not accept it. He never offered me meds (for IBS) and I lived with terrible pain on a daily basis. He finally did bloodwork to check me for Celiac but ruled it out when the bloodwork came back negative. I also had an endoscopy done which showed patchy inflammation and he continued to dismiss Celiac. I knew what I was going through was not normal and was not IBS, I knew something more serious was going on.

I really cannot offer any advise on the blood work except to say it is my understanding if you have a positive result you most likely have Celiac or gluten sensitivity. If you are not comfortable with the results you could check out www.enterolab.com they perform a stool panel test, which is more sensative than blood.

A gluten free diet is not bad, yes at first it can be a little overwhelming but it does get better especially after you see the change in yourself and the way you feel.

I hope this helps and that you get answers soon! :)

seeking-wholeness Explorer

sunny,

You certainly could have celiac disease. Blood tests can come back false-negative for a number of reasons. Also, celiac disease-related antibodies are concenrated INSIDE the small intestine and usually only "spill" over into the bloodstream LATE in the course of the disease! Another interesting observation is that blood antibody levels DO NOT correlate with the extent of intestinal damage. Some patients have low antibody levels but a lot of intestinal damage, while others have high antibody levels and little damage (but presumably the celiac disease is affecting other body systems, just not primarily the intestines).

If your doctor refuses to schedule a biopsy, you will need to decide whether to try the gluten-free diet immediately or pursue further testing first. Open Original Shared Link testing would probably still be accurate even after you go gluten-free (for a couple of months, at least), but conventional testing would NOT be!

The gluten-free diet is "difficult" only in that YOU must accept COMPLETE responsibility for ensuring that your food is safe to eat. It is extremely risky to trust other people's judgment, especially if they are not gluten-free themselves, and even their best intentions can easily be derailed by contaminated cookware or countertops! However, it is usually NOT difficult to stick with the diet once you start to see improvement, simply because you will feel so much better. It can take time before improvement becomes noticeable, and you WILL have a lot of accidents for the first year or so, but you will be healing--and that makes it worth it!

It is great that you prefer natural healing to drug "therapy"--too many people (in my opinion) don't! I hope you get some answers soon, so you can begin to heal. Good luck!

sunny13 Newbie

Thank you for your advice. I actually have the test results in my hand right now. The 2 tests showing weak positive results are the Antigliadin IgA and the Antigliadin IgG. It the tTG that reflects negative results.

After reading the responses that I have received from this message board and conducting my own research, I plan to stop taking the Irritable Bowel Medication this week and begin a gluten-free diet this weekend. I may also take advantage of the more specific test (enterolab). Like many other people on these message boards I tend to be prone to mouth sores as well. Also I notice that sometimes I develop a minor allergic reactions to certain types of beer. Could this be due to Gluten Sensitivuty/celiac disease?

Now I am on a quest to find out what food and drink are gluten-free. Any suggestions of where I can find detailed lists on the internet would be greatly appreciated! Again thanks for the quick responses :)

Guest jhmom

Good for you! I am happy to hear you are taking charge of your health!! :D

I do not drink beer or other drinks but it seems that I have read something about beer having gluten in it. If you do a search on "beer" on this board it will pull up all posts related to it.

As far as other gluten-free food and drink, here is a good link of "some" of the gluten free foods and drinks:

www.glutenfreeinfo.com

I hope this helps :)

gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Sunny13,

I have something to say about the blood tests. First off they are not 100% accurate, I don't think there are too many tests out there that are. <_< But as for the tTG test being negative, first off the test has to be performed by a specialized lab, and it has to be done using human tTG and most regular labs use pig tTG. Unless you use human tTG the test is not accurate. I personally tested negative on all the blood tests. My kids tested positive on the IGG only and have now had the tests repeated by their new doctor and he only uses Promethius Labs for testing for Celiac Disease and they only use human tTG and always check for IGA deficiency (which can alter your test results if you are deficient in IGA). I know my test were done by an incompetent lab (at least as far as celiac disease goes), but at least I can be assured that my kids tests are accurate. :rolleyes:

God bless,

Mariann

By the way, I was diagnosed through Enterolab using their Complete Stool and Gene Panel. I tested positive on the Gliadin and tTG stool tests, and positive for HLA DQ2 (the main gene responsible for celiac disease, the other being HLA DQ8).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.