Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy looked normal? Does this mean it’s not celiac?

Idlwxe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Idlwxe Newbie
Idlwxe
Posted

Hi I had my endoscopy today, the nurse said it looked normal. Is there a chance that the biopsy will show damage still? Is there anyone who has had a normal looking endoscopy? 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

There is still a chance that when the biopsies are examined under a microscope the pathologist will diagnose celiac disease.  Some newer endoscopes have better magnification than others and can see the villi during the endoscopy.  

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

My GI told me that everything looked great on my endoscopy, but my biopsies revealed significant damage.  You have to wait for the pathologist’s report.  When I had a repeat endoscopy, my new GI had a scope that had a much more powerful magnification.  So, it depends on the scope.  

Waiting is hard!  

vvicin02 Enthusiast
vvicin02
Posted

My GI told me the same. When he looked at it he said the villi looked healed after one year on a GFD. I found that odd since my blood work still indicated some antibodies were still present - improved but still not normal. However, the biopsy showed mild to moderate villous blunting. Results indicate that it was healing but will take time. Lot depends where the GI took samples which can vary. Please let us know your results.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,591
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    DomGarcia
    Newest Member
    DomGarcia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      Waiting on biopsy after positive bloodwork, but also not really believing this is real

      By Alibu · Posted

      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Found coffee or coffee pods that contain gluten

      By linnylou73 · Posted

      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By KimMS · Posted

      Thank you! Very helpful.
    • Scott Adams
      Helping child go strict gluten-free and concerns about growth/height

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...