Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Chance of false positive?


Phosis

Recommended Posts

Phosis Explorer

So here is my story...I am 33, started having really bad digestive issues after a flu early last year. Indigestion, cramps, diarrhea. My stomach has always been sensitive, but this was a whole new mess, and so I want to multiple appointments with my GP, including blood work that I didn't know was looking for celiac (my mother is celiac as well) The doctor determined I had IBS. And after a few months, the issues subsided for the most part, though I would still have indigestion sometimes when having coffee, and the occasional bout of loose stools. I also believe my stomach processes are highly tied to stress.

I had things mostly under control from about august last year until october this year. The only thing that developed during that time was lactose intolerance, which seems to worsen as time goes on. And occasionally, very fatty foods will cause me issues as well, and send me to the bathroom fairly urgently.

Anyways, in October, things were normal, but I had a bad bout of diahrea after some food that didn't sit right (which I can't even remember now) and there was some blood. I was sent for a colonoscopy, and it was determined that it was a hemmy - everything else was clear. But my GI doctor noted that I had a positive TtG IgA test of 25, and that she thought I may have celiac so I was scheduled for an endoscopy.

Well, the stress of this sent my system into overdrive, and I have been dealing with a lot of indigestion issues. During the endo, it was discovered that I had a Schatzki Ring, but visually, no other issues were seen. Biopsies were taken.

Given my issues and bloodwork, is it likely that my results are negative? I am still waiting for biopsies, and she has still ordered me to eat gluten free. I do notice my symptoms are beginning to calm down a little after a week, but it could also be due to my stress levels decreasing. I can be a bit of a hypochondriac in the sense that I obsess over symptoms and that sends me into a tail spin and gets me worried about other more deadly things. But if there was no damage visible during endocsopy, I am now wondering what the diagnosis will be...

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ennis-TX Grand Master

First this disease is genetic, if your mother has it then you can develop it at any point in your life, many find a illness or bout of stress activated the gene.
Lactose intolerance is common with this disease as the tips of the villi produce the enzymes to break it down. So as it progresses many lose the ability to digest lactose, it does sometimes come back with healing.
You had positive blood test on one test, even if your biopsies come back clean you should consider a full panel or going gluten free anyway and seeing how many issues resolve.
Biopsies, your intestines splayed out have the area of a tennis court...they are taking tiny biopsies and looking under a microscope. If your damage is patchy still then they might miss it.

Now on the bright side, anxiety, indigestion, loose stools, and D are all known symptoms of celiac, and many if not all could resolve in 6 months to a year of a gluten free diet (assuming your not exposed often)

Phosis Explorer

Thank you for the response. I have been looking it up and I did test positive, and it seems like false negatives are not very common. I will make sure even if the results are negative that they keep looking for reasons, but it sounds like I am on the right track to stay on a gluten free diet as it does seem to be having some effect. This makes me feel much better actually talking to someone else. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

If your GI used an older scope, your small intestine might look just fine (like mine did).  But the proof is in the biopsies.  There is a chance that damage areas could be missed as Ennis suggested.  I think your GI is most likely diagnosing you a bit early with a family history and a positive TTG.  But for those who are reading this response, you should wait until you get the biopsy results before going gluten free.  Lab results can get misplaced or damaged.  Who would want to go back on gluten if they had to do a repeat blood test or biopsies?  Not me!  Celiacs tend to react even more, once you have gone gluten free.  

New Mayo study shows that 44% of first-degree relatives (parents, siblings, kids) have celiac disease even if symptom free!  

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20190822/Mayo-Clinic-Study-Calls-For-Screening-Of-Family-Members-Of-Celiac-Disease-Patients.aspx

Phosis Explorer

Thanks.

My problem is I work a full time job and just to manage the systems properly, going gluten free seems to have been a necessary change. It was so bad I missed a week and a half of work. While I am certainly still having issues, things seem to be calming down significantly for me now. But who knows what will happen going forward!

cyclinglady Grand Master
(edited)
1 hour ago, Phosis said:

Thanks.

My problem is I work a full time job and just to manage the systems properly, going gluten free seems to have been a necessary change. It was so bad I missed a week and a half of work. While I am certainly still having issues, things seem to be calming down significantly for me now. But who knows what will happen going forward!

I would be shocked if your biopsies do not show damage.  Not with a mother with celiac and an elevated TTG.  Not sure of  the lab range. If it is slightly above the normal range, an elevated TTG could be attributed to another illness like Crohn’s.  My niece had celiac disease firmly out (full blood panel: TTG, DGP, EMA) and biopsies.  Still having issues, her fourth GI ordered a pill camera and found damage beyond the reach of both scopes.  She knows she can still develop celiac disease and should be re-screened.  Just like my kid who has been screened twice in the last six years, but does not have celiac disease as of now.   

Feeling good so soon on the gluten-free diet tells you so much.  Gluten is not for you.  

Edited by cyclinglady
Phosis Explorer

An update: my doctor confirmed celiac. I do not have all the details in front of me but "total vilious atrophy" or something like that. And also chronic gastritis. H pylori biopsy negative. Had extensive bloodwork checking liver pancreas and gallbladder and no issues there or anywhere else. So it looks like I have my answer.

I am mostly okay with it. I don't like that my family will have to deal with asome of the necessary lifestyle changes. But I have always looked at food as fuel and never really been motivated to eat out of pleasure. That said I realize I probably have a long difficult road of adjustment, specifically due to things such as cross contamination. So the annoyance factor is certainly high. Plus of course I am still uncomfortable and there are many food sensitivities I have developed that I need to tread lightly around.

Either way here we are!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome to the club that you never wanted to join! ? At least take comfort knowing you have a diagnosis.  So many people do not know.  ?

Research is your best defense.?  Learn all that you can about avoiding gluten.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.