Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ground beef processed using same equipment as products with gluten


NoGlutensToday

Recommended Posts

NoGlutensToday Enthusiast

Hi folks,

I ordered some ground beef from a delivery service that offers free range meat, raised without antibiotics. When I received my delivery I saw the box had a warning that says MAY CONTAIN: WHEAT, SOY, MUSTARD, MILK.

I contacted the company that processed this and they said the meat doesn't contain wheat, but due to labelling laws (Ontario, Canada) they must list this since they process food (sausages, possibly some other things) that contain these products in the same facility. I asked for more details and it turns out that they use the same equipment, but wash it down in between items, according to their guidelines.

To me this is a red flag and now I don't think I should risk eating this meat. I'm looking for any thoughts/feedback from this community regarding this. Also, it has me wondering if this is commonplace in the production of ground beef ... are there typically shared lines like this in the production of ground beef?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Hummm, I do not know.  I buy my meat from Costco.  They cut and grind the beef on site.  While they do season some cuts of meat (seasoning does not contain gluten), they do not put anything through the grinder except beef.    They do not make sausages.  
 

The company did say that they cleaned the lines, but if it were me, I would give that beef away.  Nothing is worth activating my celiac disease.  It could be a very low risk or no risk,  but I would worry.  I am a worrier.  Nothing like vomiting, laying on the bathroom floor and passing out from pain.  But that is just me.  Your mileage may vary.  
 

Did you try googling or reading any reviews?  

NoGlutensToday Enthusiast
11 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Hummm, I do not know.  I buy my meat from Costco.  They cut and grind the beef on site.  While they do season some cuts of meat (seasoning does not contain gluten), they do not put anything through the grinder except beef.    They do not make sausages.  
 

The company did say that they cleaned the lines, but if it were me, I would give that beef away.  Nothing is worth activating my celiac disease.  It could be a very low risk or no risk,  but I would worry.  I am a worrier.  Nothing like vomiting, laying on the bathroom floor and passing out from pain.  But that is just me.  Your mileage may vary.  
 

Did you try googling or reading any reviews?  

Yeah, I'm like you in that I'm a worrier. I'm leaning towards not eating this. At the same time, I'm trying to learn more because this raises questions I hadn't considered before.

This particular warning ("MAY CONTAIN") falls under Health Canada's Food Allergen Precautionary Statements. I did some reading on Health Canada's website and it said: "Precautionary labelling should only be used when, despite all reasonable measures, the inadvertent presence of allergens in food is unavoidable. It must not be used when an allergen or allergen-containing ingredient is deliberately added to a food. Furthermore, the use of a precautionary statement where there is no real risk of an allergen being present in the food is contrary to the Department's goal of enabling a variety of safe and nutritious food choices for the allergic consumer."

So, it is voluntary because there isn't proof that allergens are present, but there is a real risk that it is there. The butchers say they washed the equipment according to their standards, but didn't outline those standards. And without them disclosing these details, they can't satisfy my concern enough to have me actually consume their product.

The question this raises for me is whether the local supermarket I otherwise get my beef from has the same risks, but opts to not include the voluntary statement. (After all, it is voluntary.) I'll have to follow-up by emailing them now.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristina S
    Newest Member
    Kristina S
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.