Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Normal endoscopy?


adm818

Recommended Posts

adm818 Rookie

I’m waiting on my biopsy results, but my doctor said from what he saw during the endoscopy, everything looks normal. I know some people say that the biopsy could still come back positive, but I’m wondering if that’s actually common? Do most people with celiac have visible villi blunting during the endoscopy? Or is it more common than I think for the endoscopy to look normal but the biopsy be positive? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Celiac disease, almost by definition, involves villi damage, although they are now diagnosing celiac disease more often via blood test results alone. In the past villi damage was basically a pre-requisite to a diagnosis.

After much learning over 25 years, I like to think that villi damage is the end stage of celiac disease, and doctors should use blood tests in most cases to diagnose it, rather than let it reach the stage where villi damage occurs. Blood tests now have the ability to diagnose celiacs before they end up with villi damage (some people would argue that CD still requires this damage, and I'm happy to take up this argument with anyone).

Did you get a celiac disease blood panel done? If so, can you share the results? Were you eating gluten, at least a slice of wheat bread, daily for at least two weeks before your endoscopy? For a blood test you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6 weeks for the test results to be valid.

adm818 Rookie

I have been gluten free for about 5 years, but I ate plenty of gluten for a solid 3 weeks prior to the endoscopy. My doctor wanted to go straight to the endoscopy instead of doing bloodwork so I didn’t have to keep eating gluten and feeling sick.  

Scott Adams Grand Master

If you are still eating gluten-free I would still request a blood test. As mentioned, some celiacs don't have villi damage, or the gastro doctor doesn't take a biopsy in the right area, and the blood results should actually be done in order to diagnose CD.

adm818 Rookie
1 hour ago, Scott Adams said:

If you are still eating gluten-free I would still request a blood test. As mentioned, some celiacs don't have villi damage, or the gastro doctor doesn't take a biopsy in the right area, and the blood results should actually be done in order to diagnose celiac disease.

Got it - thank you. I will ask for a blood test at my follow up appt to be safe.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Please let us know how it goes. Feel free to share the results with us.

MADMOM Community Regular
On 3/25/2021 at 8:20 PM, adm818 said:

I’m waiting on my biopsy results, but my doctor said from what he saw during the endoscopy, everything looks normal. I know some people say that the biopsy could still come back positive, but I’m wondering if that’s actually common? Do most people with celiac have visible villi blunting during the endoscopy? Or is it more common than I think for the endoscopy to look normal but the biopsy be positive? 

i asked for an endoscopy not knowing what i had - my GI symptoms were mild - i began feeling pinching under my ribs and near my belly button - that would not go away - my GI saw mild blunting and then did blood work which confirmed celiac disease 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



adm818 Rookie

Just got my biopsy results today - they came back negative! However, after speaking more with the doctor, I’m nervous 3 weeks eating gluten again wasn’t long enough to show up? He said if I was having symptoms, it would show up if I had celiac, and he also said there was no need for bloodwork. 
 

The doctor also told me I should be able to tolerate gluten in small amounts without getting sick, but that is NOT my experience. 
 

Can gluten sensitivity come with very severe symptoms? And is 3 weeks eating gluten enough for the biopsy to be accurate? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

3 weeks of eating a slice of wheat bread each day should be enough for a biopsy, however I don't agree that you should not get a blood test. In fact, the blood test should always be done before a biopsy, and you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6-8 weeks before a blood test.

adm818 Rookie
50 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

3 weeks of eating a slice of wheat bread each day should be enough for a biopsy, however I don't agree that you should not get a blood test. In fact, the blood test should always be done before a biopsy, and you need to eat gluten daily for at least 6-8 weeks before a blood test.

I agree with you and am seeking a second opinion regarding the blood test. That said, what would the blood test tell me if the biopsy was clear? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

You can read more about endoscopy results here, but there is a possibility that they took samples in the wrong areas, or didn't take enough samples:

Many people get positive blood test results, which means they are having an autoimmune reaction, or are sensitive to gluten, but have a negative biopsy. It's always a good idea to do the blood test, and blood test results are being used more and more now to diagnose celiac disease without a biopsy.

plumbago Experienced

Also, do you know about allergies? Could you have a wheat allergy? Celiac is an intolerance to gluten. At least it's some good news from the scope and biopsy, but yes, as advised previously, get that blood test (the order actually is, blood test first). Get the complete Celiac panel, not just one or two. Good luck. Let us know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Setb1210
    Newest Member
    Setb1210
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...