Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help understanding bloodwork


Emma84
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

Emma84 Explorer
2 minutes ago, Russ H said:

The Mayo clinic says 2 slices of bread a day for 6-8 weeks prior to blood test and just 2 weeks prior to endoscopy. It is probably enough. I have seen testing centres recommending from 4 weeks all the way up to 12 weeks prior to blood testing.

Okay well there should at least be some damage then even if it’s not extreme 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Russ H Community Regular
3 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

Okay well there should at least be some damage then even if it’s not extreme 

The amount to eat and for how long:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byTYmgHUDEo

 

Emma84 Explorer
20 minutes ago, Russ H said:

The amount to eat and for how long:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byTYmgHUDEo

 

Thank you 

Emma84 Explorer
On 4/25/2023 at 12:38 PM, Emma84 said:

Okay well there should at least be some damage then even if it’s not extreme 

What is this test specifically looking at (if you know?)

 

IgA w/reflex to Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Ab

 

 

On 4/25/2023 at 10:42 AM, trents said:

Yes. For instance, another bowel disease such as Crohn's. No one is saying it's definitely not celiac. Your IgG positive indicates possible celiac disease but possible other medical issues. IGG is not as specific for celiac disese as the tTG-IGA and the EMA tests.

What is this test specifically testing if you happen to know? 

 

IgA w/reflex to Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Ab

 

trents Grand Master
(edited)
31 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

What is this test specifically looking at (if you know?)

 

IgA w/reflex to Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Ab

 

 

What is this test specifically testing if you happen to know? 

 

IgA w/reflex to Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Ab

 

It isn't specifically testing for anything. "With reflex" usually means a secondary test was ordered because the primary test result was unexpected or because the physician was aware that the primary test might be inaccurate due to say, the patient having already begun a gluten free diet.

Edited by trents
Emma84 Explorer
23 hours ago, trents said:

It isn't specifically testing for anything. "With reflex" usually means a secondary test was ordered because the primary test result was unexpected or because the physician was aware that the primary test might be inaccurate due to say, the patient having already begun a gluten free diet.

I guess I’m confused about if this is testing IgA or igG because it has both in the name 

trents Grand Master
1 hour ago, Emma84 said:

I guess I’m confused about if this is testing IgA or igG because it has both in the name 

The IGA was run first and it's results prompted (physician to run the secondary IgG test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emma84 Explorer
5 hours ago, trents said:

The IGA was run first and it's results prompted (physician to run the secondary IgG test.

So the 368 is the IGA number? 
 

if so, the cut off is 400, so while in the normal range, that definitely seems to be on the high end of normal. Is it possible I didn’t eat gluten for long enough? 

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Yes, the 368 is for total IGA and the IGG was ordered as a reflex test, probably because you were negative for the tTG-IGA (the most common and well-rounded test available) but still had celiac symptoms. IGG will sometimes catch those who actually do have celiac disease but don't throw a positive for the tTG-IGA as expected. Those alternate antibody tests are commonly used when total IGA is low because low total IGA can give a false negative for the tTG-IGA but this was not the reason in your case because your total IGA was within normal range.

What symptoms do you have?

Edited by trents
Emma84 Explorer
11 hours ago, trents said:

Yes, the 368 is for total IGA and the IGG was ordered as a reflex test, probably because you were negative for the tTG-IGA (the most common and well-rounded test available) but still had celiac symptoms. IGG will sometimes catch those who actually do have celiac disease but don't throw a positive for the tTG-IGA as expected. Those alternate antibody tests are commonly used when total IGA is low because low total IGA can give a false negative for the tTG-IGA but this was not the reason in your case because your total IGA was within normal range.

What symptoms do you have?

Persistent GI issues that only go away when not eating gluten going back to elementary school. I seem to have severe symptoms to just small amounts (and this has been placebo tested, 3 times in the past year I was told something was gluten free, ate it, was on the floor with cramps for hours and had diarrhea, and then found out after looking closer at the ingredients that there had been something like soy sauce or worcheshire sauce in it) 

 

fatigue like sleeping 10-12 hours a day 

Unexplained overactive bladder starting in high school.

some weird bloodwork for my reproductive hormones in my mid 20s that doesn’t seem to be caused by pcos (the most common cause). Resolves once going gluten free again. 


unexplained rashes that only occur when eating gluten (although none look like DH) 

Frequently having Yellow poop when eating gluten 

unintentional weight loss when eating gluten 

 

 

as far as I can tell, only seem to have low vitamin D in terms of deficiencies though 

 

Emma84 Explorer
11 hours ago, trents said:

Yes, the 368 is for total IGA and the IGG was ordered as a reflex test, probably because you were negative for the tTG-IGA (the most common and well-rounded test available) but still had celiac symptoms. IGG will sometimes catch those who actually do have celiac disease but don't throw a positive for the tTG-IGA as expected. Those alternate antibody tests are commonly used when total IGA is low because low total IGA can give a false negative for the tTG-IGA but this was not the reason in your case because your total IGA was within normal range.

What symptoms do you have?

And bad back and neck pain going back to high school 

trents Grand Master
(edited)

Again, it is possible you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but shares many of the same symptoms. There is no reliable test for it yet but we sometimes see the less specific, non IGA antibody levels elevated with NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out to arrive at an NCGS diagnosis. NCGS does not damage the small bowel villi like celiac disease does. Both NCGS and celiac disease have the same antidote, namely, total avoidance of gluten.

Edited by trents
Emma84 Explorer
11 hours ago, trents said:

Yes, the 368 is for total IGA and the IGG was ordered as a reflex test, probably because you were negative for the tTG-IGA (the most common and well-rounded test available) but still had celiac symptoms. IGG will sometimes catch those who actually do have celiac disease but don't throw a positive for the tTG-IGA as expected. Those alternate antibody tests are commonly used when total IGA is low because low total IGA can give a false negative for the tTG-IGA but this was not the reason in your case because your total IGA was within normal range.

What symptoms do you have?

It’s totally possible I don’t have it, maybe more than likely given my blood work and no real deficiencies but all other bowel diseases seem like they would have a wider array of trigger foods than just gluten so that’s why I’m so confused 

2 minutes ago, trents said:

Again, it is possible you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease but shares many of the same symptoms. There is no reliable test for it yet but we sometimes see the less specific, non IGA antibody levels elevated with NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out to arrive at an NCGS diagnosis. NCGS does not damage the small bowel villi like celiac disease does. Both NCGS and celiac disease have the same antidote, namely, total avoidance of gluten.

Could be! Just seems to be an intense intolerance if my body can react that much to such a small amount. I figured someone with an intolerance would be less reactive to small amounts 

trents Grand Master
2 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

It’s totally possible I don’t have it, maybe more than likely given my blood work and no real deficiencies but all other bowel diseases seem like they would have a wider array of trigger foods than just gluten so that’s why I’m so confused 

That's another reason to consider NCGS.

Emma84 Explorer
45 minutes ago, trents said:

That's another reason to consider NCGS.

The thing that’s confusing to me is the cross system issues I seem to have, like why is an intolerance throwing off my reproductive  hormones and my bladder? Also notice depression/anxiety/ brain fog and back pain and fatigue. Aren’t those characteristic of autoimmune issues? 

herminia Apprentice
On 4/25/2023 at 9:04 AM, Emma84 said:

these are my results. They’re proceeding with an endoscopy. What do these mean? Am I likely to have celiac? 
 

Celiac Disease Evaluation

Deaminated Gliadin Antibody, IgA    2.4    U/mL

Deaminated Gliadin Antibody, IgG    51.9    U/mL

IgA w/reflex to Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Ab    368.00    mg/dL

Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) Antibodies IgA    <0.5

That’s copied from the blood test results and all the Celiac tests that were done. Do these make any sense to you?

If I recall....the first TT Iga indicated gluten intolerance: numbers,  went from +3 to10, indicator for gluten intolerance. My second TT (different test) indicated allergy, after a week of indulgence, numbers much higher but nowhere near the numbers you indicated. I did experience severe stomach pain and nausea, but your numbers seem to be indicative of a major allergy. What I do know is that NOT eating wheat, barley and rye has worked for me.

Emma84 Explorer
4 minutes ago, herminia said:

If I recall....the first TT Iga indicated gluten intolerance: numbers,  went from +3 to10, indicator for gluten intolerance. My second TT (different test) indicated allergy, after a week of indulgence, numbers much higher but nowhere near the numbers you indicated. I did experience severe stomach pain and nausea, but your numbers seem to be indicative of a major allergy. What I do know is that NOT eating wheat, barley and rye has worked for me.

I think the ranges might be different. According to my ranges, everything g is normal except for gliadin IgG which is very elevated (like 3 times elevated I think) 

trents Grand Master
16 minutes ago, Emma84 said:

The thing that’s confusing to me is the cross system issues I seem to have, like why is an intolerance throwing off my reproductive  hormones and my bladder? Also notice depression/anxiety/ brain fog and back pain and fatigue. Aren’t those characteristic of autoimmune issues? 

As I said, NCGS and celiac disease share many of the same symptoms. We know much more about the way celiac disease affects the immune system than we do about how NCGS does. Some experts believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease. What we do know is that both conditions produce collateral damage to other body systems. For instance, gluten ataxia, a neurological disorder is found in both those with celiac disease and those with NCGS. And don't assume that every health condition you experience is necessarily tied to a gluten disorder. Many people who have some of the medical issues you struggle with have neither celiac disease or NCGS.

herminia Apprentice
On 4/25/2023 at 10:43 AM, Emma84 said:

Gotcha, thank you. 
 

 

can you help me understand the link below? The way it reads to me it sounds like the IgG being elevated is accurate 84% of the time? Unless I’m misreading this ? 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2440671/

Gotcha. Celiac seems to be the only thing that makes sense, as it only appears to be gluten that causes problems and cutting out gluten seems to be the only solution.
 

anyways, I guess I’ll find out tomorrow morning. I’m so sick of pooping and sleeping all the time. Hopefully if it’s not celiac, they’ll see something else that will tell me what it is.  

Someone within these past few days posted about pain and pressure located around the left rib area radiating to the back...this happens to me on occasions for no reason. I never associated it with my celiac and would like more info if it is indeed related. I take heavy duty leftover pills for pain when it happens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,743
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.