Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Baby Of Celiac Parent: How Should She Be Tested?


alexisb

Recommended Posts

alexisb Rookie

I was diagnosed with celiac disease two months after my first child was born. Since then I have been totally gluten-free and so has she. Now that she is a year old, I feel that I should test her, but of course without her having consumed gluten, a bloodtest won't be get me very far! My question is, what is the wisest step to take? I consider my options to be as follows:

1. Expose her to gluten and watch her reaction/get a bloodtest (I just would hate for her to get sick!!!)

2. Get a DNA test to potentially knock out the possibility

3. Do nothing and just keep her gluten free awhile longer.

Does anyone have any experience in this area? My GI and her pediatrician are suprisingly not giving me much direction one way or another.

Thanks to anyone who can give me a little guidance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AndreaB Contributor

I'm in the same boat as you. I did not have a celiac panel done or anything like that. I had allergy tests done then went off gluten (except for Rice Dream, which I am now off) and then went through enterolab and learned I have a gluten intolerance. My thinking at this point is to run enterolab as soon as he is old enough to get a sample from. He will get two genes from us either 2 celiac or 1 celiac and 1 gluten insensitive. I definately vote for the gene test. Then take it from there. I, personally, am not too excited about trying gluten with my baby boy. He showed a sensitivity to cross contamination of something I ate. He was strictly breasfed at the time. He's just started solids. I may try him on baby oat cereal but I'm not sure.

TCA Contributor

My nursing daughter showed symptoms, so I went gluten-free and she improved. Since she was off gluten, we did the gene test through prometheus. I'm a little confused as to the difference in prometheus and enterolab. Prometheus tests for 2 genes, DQ2 and DQ8. Enterolab seems to test for multiple ones. Her GI didn't think enterolab was a good idea and said Prometheus was very good with celiac, so that's why we chose them. I don't think I would stress about it too much yet. If she's in a home that's gluten-free, why not just keep her that way a while longer? If you need to let her eat gluten b/c of daycare or somehting, then just see how she does on it. I don't see the point in challenging her to gluten just to see what it does, though. If you do decide to start her on gluten, you might have her checked after a while to be cautious, or if she's showing symptoms, of course. She may not have it, but your concern is good. I don't see testing if she's not eating gluten anyway, though.

alexisb Rookie

Thanks for your comments. How do you go about the DNA test? Do I contact Prometheus myself or do it through her pediatrician?

AndreaB Contributor

Enterolab tests for the celiac genes as well as the gluten sensitivty genes. There are other threads on this forum that talk about enterolab if you are interested in learning more about them. Just do a search for enterolab. Just because a person doesn't have the celiac genes doesn't mean they won't develop non celiac gluten intolerance.

This is from my enterolab test. My husband has 2 celiac genes as well as my oldest son, and my daughter has one of each like me. My infant hasn't been tested yet.

Interpretation Of HLA-DQ Testing: HLA gene analysis reveals that you have one of the main genes that predisposes to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue, HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8. Each of your offspring has a 50% chance of receiving this gene from you, and at least one of your parents passed it to you. You also have a non-celiac gene predisposing to gluten sensitivity (DQ1 or DQ3 not subtype 8). Having one celiac gene and one gluten sensitive gene, means that each of your parents, and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of a gluten sensitive gene. Having two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity or celiac disease may be more severe.

Dr. Fine's work is accepted by some doctors as proof of celiac or gluten intolerance without having to have all the damage done. Since it is a stool test the damage can be caught before the blood shows the IgA levels. My son, daughter and myself are all gluten intolerant. Had we continued eating gluten even though we showed no obvious signs then I believe we would have eventually gotten sick and had many more problems.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,663
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Funnybone
    Newest Member
    Funnybone
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
    • Xravith
      Thank you for the advice. I’ve actually never checked for nutritional deficiencies, but for as long as I can remember, I’ve always taken vitamin and mineral supplements — otherwise my symptoms get worse. This week I stopped eating gluten to confirm whether my symptoms are really caused by it. Starting next week, I’ll reintroduce gluten — it’s sad to go back to how I was before — but at least I’ll be able to take the necessary tests properly. I think the diagnostic process will be long, but at least I’m happy that I finally decided to address this doubt I’ve had for years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.