Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many Of You/your Children Were Preemies?


skipper30

Recommended Posts

Gcbec Newbie

My first child was born 27 weeks weighed 1 lb 8 oz, due to me having pre-eclampsia turning eclampsia. I also have other autoimune problems which was found to be the cause of all the problems in my pregnancy. Now, what came first I dont know, but as far as I know my 9 year old doesnt have celiac. Although she has never been tested, I have not seen any symptoms. (forgot had sever hypremisis as well saw someone else with that it was horrible)

My second was born at 33 weeks, 6 lbs. I started pre term contractions at 16 weeks, had 2nd pulmonary embolism at 26 weeks, and gestational diabetes. Finally induced again because of pre eclampsia. This is the one I have 1 positive test and know he has celiac. (hypremisis again)

Now whether or not it is from being premature, I dont think so, but I think if the mom has celiac that would effect premature birth. Just because of the autoimune response, malobsorption, and diet. Had I had diagnosis of celiac, it might have prevented my children from premature births who knows. Very interseting I never thought of it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest ~jules~

Both of my boys were exactly 2 weeks early to the day. Michael was only 6 lbs, and Sean was 6lb 9oz. I had normal pregnancies, except constant nausea the whole time, not just in the first trimester. I don't remember anything happening until after I had my second child, I had post-pardum pretty bad though. Myself I was a day late 7 lbs. I think my trigger was stress.

LL04 Newbie

I find this all very interesting. I, myelf as a baby was a whole month late and was very sickly. I know now that I had celiac disease but it went undiagnosed my whole life.

I have 4 children and had terrible hyperemisis (severe vomiting) for the full nine months of pregnancy with the first 3 of them. I was hospitalized with each one and each time I weighed exactly the same or less when I gave birth than I did before I got pregnant. I had not yet been diagnosed with celiac disease with any of them. Suprisingly my kids didn't seem any worse for the wear because of the nasty pregnancies. The first two came right on their due dates, the third 6 days late and the last 3 days early. There were no complications, the labours were wonderfully quick and they were all healthy 7 or so pounders (except the first at 6lbs 6ozs, but still healthy). However, my first got croup so many times in the first year that he became allergic to amoxicillin, but that's it. No other grief at all. All of them have been tested for celiac disease and are negative (and yes, what does that really mean??!!), but my middle two, a girl 9 and a boy 5, both display symptoms of celiac disease, especially the boy. I breastfed all of them for at least a year or more.

I have northern european ancestery as does my husband so we are prime candidates for celiac disease, which I do have and he hasn't yet been tested for. I am positive my brother has it but he refuses to get tested and other than that we can't trace our family history to know if anyone else has had it. Sooooo.....our children are PRIME candidates. You would think that after being sick so much and having so many antibiotics that it would have been a catalyst for our first boy to get it but he is now healthier than most kids I know and he never gets sick now, not even really any colds!

It would really be interesting if we could see what would have happened if any of them had been premature? Would that have made a difference with the first?

This is such a great question but one I'm afraid will probably not be answered in our lifetime. Research into Celiac's is just finally gaining momentum so I believe it will be a long way off before anyone even begins to probe the possibility of premature births and celiac's having some sort of connection.

Maybe I'm wrong....maybe someone is already looking into this.....???

kevsmom Contributor

My teenage son was born 3 weeks early. He weighed 8 lbs. 1 oz. I hate to think about what he would have weighed if he waited until his due date! I am diabetic, and it is not unusual for diabetics to have large babies. He had constant ear infections from the time he was 3 weeks old he was 15 months old and had tubes put in. He just had a negative endoscopy (yeah!)

Cindy

Becky6 Enthusiast

I was late.

My dd was born at 33 weeks weighing 2 lbs 12 oz and 15". I had severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome.

abc Rookie

My last baby - now almost 9mos - was born 6 weeks premature. He had all the normal preemie probs, but came home from NICU after 8 days (just in time for Christmas!) He is now a whopping 21.5 pounds, so no eating issues there.

I also had trouble getting pregnant with my first child, and am curious about infertility and celiac. I am still awaiting test results as to whether I am gluten intolerant...but it could explain the "unexplained" infertility and the "unexplained" prematurity?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.