Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Here


peggles

Recommended Posts

peggles Rookie

I found this site a couple of weeks ago and it's great. It was suggested last month that I most likely have celiac disease. I tested highly positive on my blood work and was referred to a GI doc. I am going in tomorrow for an endoscopy. Since I am anemic and there is a history of colon cancer in my family (my grandfather) they want to do a colonoscopy too. I was really suprised when the doctor told me that celiac disease was most likely the problem. I had only heard of it when I was researching information on food intolerance. No one in my family has ever been diagnosed with this.

Looking back there were probably symptoms that I have had for quite a while that I have just brushed off. I have always been thin and I have had a lifelong tendency to be slightly anemic (now I'm really anemic). Back when I was a teenager and through my 20's (I'm 43 now) I occassionally would have episodes of intestinal pain that were unexplained. I couldn't seem to attribute these attacks to any specific thing I had consumed. The only time I ever did see a doc about it (back when I was in high school) he told me I probably just had gas and told me to take a teaspoon of Mylanta every day. What a jerk.

About 3 years ago I problems with diarreah for about 2 months. I went to a doctor who apparently was not tuned into the idea of celiac. Her only suggestion was that if I continued to have problems that I should see a GI. Well, I just started to mysteriously feel better a few weeks afterward, so I was just convinced that it was the stress that I was under at that time.

I don't always have obvious symptoms like diarreah but that is what finally drove me to believe that I had a problem and that it wasn't just "all in my head". I had been having chronic problems since February that seemed to let up once in a while. I finally couldn't take it anymore and was able to see a different doctor. She seemed to be tipped off right away from taking my history and ordered the antibody panel. When she called me with the results I got off the phone and cried. It was such a relief to have someone tell me "YES there is something real going on with you!! You aren't nuts!!"

Now that I have learned more while I have been waiting to get in for this biopsy I am convinced that the results will be positive. I also suspect that my 14 year old daughter is too and will discuss it with her when I take my daughter in for a physical next week. I'm wondering if my other two kids should be screened too even though don't have symptoms.

Peg


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rattaway Newbie

Welcome Peg. Definitely have your kids tested. If they are gluten intolerant, you are sparing them years of damage by getting them tested now and on the gluten-free diet rather than waiting until they have so many symptoms that they are in agony. That is if they have it. Guess you won't know until they are tested though. Best wishes to you and your family. All the celiacs here are awesome and so helpful.

Rian

lovegrov Collaborator

ALL first-degree relatives should be tested -- parents, kids, and siblings. All mine were and my 70-year-old father came back highly positive despite only minor symptoms.

From what you've described, you have celiac, no matter what the biopsy says. With highly positive tests and symptoms, it's nearly a 100 percent sure thing even without a biopsy.

Sometimes biopsies come back negative either because they didn't take enough samples or because you quit eating gluten (did you?). The ultimate proof after the biopsy is to go gluten-free and see if you improve.

richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,610
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dayna cerminata
    Newest Member
    Dayna cerminata
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...