Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Here- I Have Some Questions

Ex3

Recommended Posts

Ex3 Newbie
Ex3
Posted

Hi all! I'm sure you all get people like me all the time. I'm new to this celiac thing and need some help. My son is 4.5 years old and I had him tested for celiac last week. He's not really showing symptoms but I've had cause to look into celiac (it's a long story). I know there's a family history on my husbands side of stomach ailments. 2 people have Crohn's and his brother has diverticulosis. Anyways, I got the results back and I'm really confused. I was hoping maybe you all could shed some light on this. The ped. that gave me the results was not helpful at all and would not explain what the results mean. He said I could take him off wheat for a couple of months and see what happens. But I'd prefer to know if he actually has celiac. His IgA results were <4 (negative is 0-4) and his IgG results were 10 (>9 is positive). His IgA was <4 (0-3 is negative) and his tTG was <6 (0-5 is negative). I'm sorry to throw out a bunch of numbers. I don't know what they mean but I'm hoping someone here will. Any opinions are welcomed :) .

Ann

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Corkdarrr Enthusiast
Corkdarrr
Posted

I have no idea what those results mean, either. But if I were you I'd find a new ped. ASAP if he won't even explain test results to you....kinda defeats the purpose of testing to begin with, doesn't it?

Someone will jump in shortly, I'm sure.

We're all still abuzz from the story that was on CNN a half hour ago! :P

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

All those numbers are either just above, or at the high end of normal, which I think suggests there may be a problem, or that may be normal for him....

You might want to consider taking him off gluten -all gluten- for 3 months and during that time monitor his behaviour, eating, weight, etc. Then, after three months introduce gluten again and again monitor everything about him.

If you see changes, you'll have a better idea about whether or not gluten is a problem for him.

Ex3 Newbie
Ex3
Posted
  • Author

I also wanted to add....I did a gluten/casein peptide test and for gluten he was .94 (normal is <.95). So again he was borderline.

GFBetsy Rookie
GFBetsy
Posted

Usually (though I'm not guaranteeing that this holds true for all labs) there is an "equivocal" range for the TtG. In other words, there is a range of numbers where the lab doesn't say you are negative, but they won't call you positive, either. My daugter's bloodwork came back Equivocal for TtG, but the blood tests are notorious for returning false positives for children, so I assumed that the fact that she didn't come back below the negative cutoff meant that she was positive. I took her off of gluten, and 3 days later her diarhea was gone and she started smiling all the time. Which just confirmed (to me) that "equivocal" meant "positive" for her.

It looks like your son might have 2 or 3 results that the labs might label as equivocal or slightly positive. If you want a "firm" diagnosis, you probably need to push your pediatrician to refer you to a pediatric GI and have a biopsy done. If you ever want to have a biopsy done, your son will need to be eating gluten in order to show damage in his intestines, so you would probably want to have it done before ever taking him gluten free.

ON THE OTHER HAND, and this is a big caveat here, if he responds positively to the diet, you really know that he's got problems with gluten. Having a "firm" diagnosis of celiac can actually be a negative thing . . . there are several people on the board who have been denied insurance bacause of their firm diagnosis. I noticed that you say he doesn't really show symptoms . . . this is where taking him off of gluten is harder for you, because you don't have those "obvious" improvements to judge by. I think I would just echo Jestgar's advice . . . if you decide to give gluten free a try, closely monitor his behavior, appetite, etc. so you will be able to judge whether the diet is helping him or not.

Good luck!

emcmaster Collaborator
emcmaster
Posted

Hi there and welcome,

I wanted to add that there is nothing unhealthy about a gluten-free diet - so if you are unsure about the results, taking him gluten-free will do nothing "bad" to him if it turns out he doesn't have problems with gluten (although with the borderline results, I'd say he probably does). In fact, he will probably be healthier on a gluten-free diet because of the nature of gluten-free foods - fruits, veggies, legumes, meats, etc.

Good luck & let us know how he does!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,738
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Werthesmiths4
    Newest Member
    Werthesmiths4
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Theresa2407 · Posted

      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Gigi2025 · Posted

      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Possible celiac - need advice

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac or not??

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.