Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Help!


lkelli

Recommended Posts

lkelli Rookie

I have a two year old. He has other developmental delays and has had feeding issues since solid food was introduced. After a period of decline (refusal for all food and somtimes liquid) we finally did an endoscopy Nov 1st. All was well except for inflamation (mild) in the lowe intestine and shortening of the villi. We then did a blood test for celiac which came back inconclusive (negative but borderline low IGA) BUT positive for genetic markers. At the suggestion of his dr, I started a gluten free diet while we has myself, husband and 4 year old tested. My motherinlaw insists that she has celiac and that my husband had it as a baby. Well, we all came back negative. I am actually upset. Bc if someone was positive it would help solidify my sons dx.

To make matters more confusing starting 2 or 3 days after starting the gluten free diet my 2 year old actually slept through the night and has been. This is a big change from the waking up in the middle of night screaming in pain. Also, I swear his eating has improved.

Could it still be celiac? What do I do now?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Haleigh Rookie
I have a two year old. He has other developmental delays and has had feeding issues since solid food was introduced. After a period of decline (refusal for all food and somtimes liquid) we finally did an endoscopy Nov 1st. All was well except for inflamation (mild) in the lowe intestine and shortening of the villi. We then did a blood test for celiac which came back inconclusive (negative but borderline low IGA) BUT positive for genetic markers. At the suggestion of his dr, I started a gluten free diet while we has myself, husband and 4 year old tested. My motherinlaw insists that she has celiac and that my husband had it as a baby. Well, we all came back negative. I am actually upset. Bc if someone was positive it would help solidify my sons dx.

To make matters more confusing starting 2 or 3 days after starting the gluten free diet my 2 year old actually slept through the night and has been. This is a big change from the waking up in the middle of night screaming in pain. Also, I swear his eating has improved.

Could it still be celiac? What do I do now?

Haleigh Rookie

My son was delayed developmentally. He couldn't sit up until 10 months old, so the Dr. would not let me feed him. Once I started him on solids food (cheerios), he developed a horrible diaper rash, which would never go away. He bleed in his diaper area all the time.

I took away his Cheerios, and gave him Otios. It got MUCH better, but never ok. Now I know that oats may not have been good for him, but maybe better than wheat. The pediatrician, alergist, and dermatolagist never mentioned celiac. I even told them that anyone who ate bread, then touched my son, would cause welts on his skin. This was before we had a computer and internet.

I had my son stick to a wheat free diet until he was potty trained. The good news, I think he was a much healthier baby than all of my friend's babies. I spoke to a holistic Dr. at a social event, and she told me that may be very true, because of the wheat-free life.

BTW, he caught up developmentally around 3 years of age.He's 13 1/2, and healthy and happy, as any teen can be.

My advise would be to go to a nutritionist, and start a wheat gluten free diet. With proper guidance, I don't think you can go wrong. It is a huge commitment, and even one cheerio, would set my son back for a few days

Good luck.

Haleigh

Ursa Major Collaborator
I have a two year old. He has other developmental delays and has had feeding issues since solid food was introduced. After a period of decline (refusal for all food and somtimes liquid) we finally did an endoscopy Nov 1st. All was well except for inflamation (mild) in the lowe intestine and shortening of the villi. We then did a blood test for celiac which came back inconclusive (negative but borderline low IGA) BUT positive for genetic markers. At the suggestion of his dr, I started a gluten free diet while we has myself, husband and 4 year old tested. My motherinlaw insists that she has celiac and that my husband had it as a baby. Well, we all came back negative. I am actually upset. Bc if someone was positive it would help solidify my sons dx.

To make matters more confusing starting 2 or 3 days after starting the gluten free diet my 2 year old actually slept through the night and has been. This is a big change from the waking up in the middle of night screaming in pain. Also, I swear his eating has improved.

Could it still be celiac? What do I do now?

Obviously all was NOT well with his biopsy. If they find any inflammation at all in a toddler's intestine, and shortening of the villi, that means he has damage. Especially with his villi already being damaged (which would only get worse, of course), a borderline blood test, and the celiac disease genes, there is no doubt in my mind he has celiac disease. Testing on kids under five is extremely unreliable (and is only somewhat more reliable after that), and yields many false negatives.

Since the gluten-free diet works for him, and the diet is THE most valid test in young children, you really have all the evidence you need for a firm celiac disease diagnosis.

And even though your husband's blood came back negative (a false negative, no doubt, which is very common), he obviously has celiac disease. If he was diagnosed as a baby, he has it, as it is not curable. In those days they seriously thought that you can outgrow celiac disease. Now they know that isn't possible.

While kids got better being gluten-free (of course), and often seemed fine for a while when eating gluten again (it takes a while to show enough damage to test positive, sometimes many years), that doesn't mean they were cured.

Sooner or later the autoimmune diseases, depression etc. would show up, and eventually (sometimes not until decades later) the diarrhea and other gastrointestinal problems would hit. And eventually the bowel cancer would kill people ahead of their time. It's only a matter of time before your husband will get noticeably ill, unless he eliminates gluten.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,067
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    freddykal
    Newest Member
    freddykal
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Maybe celiac but maybe NCGS that was misdiagnosed as IBS morphing gradually into celiac. Is NCGS a new category to you? It shares many of the same GI symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the small bowel lining like celiac.
    • knitty kitty
      Thiamine has antifungal properties.  The body uses thiamine to keep bacteria and yeasts from overgrowth in the digestive system.   Fluconazole use can cause thiamine deficiency.   Supplementing with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine would be beneficial as Benfotiamine promotes intestinal healing.   Thiamine and the other B vitamins tend to be low in Celiac due to malabsorption.  Talk to your doctor about supplementing vitamins and minerals.
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome @Natalia Revelo, your experience is profoundly difficult and, sadly, not entirely unique within the celiac community. It's the frustrating reality of "silent" or ongoing damage that isn't captured by the MARSH score alone, which only measures active villous atrophy. Your normal biopsy suggests your diet is preventing the classic autoimmune attack, but it doesn't mean your gut has fully healed or that other issues aren't at play. The inflammation from your newly discovered milk and egg allergies is a huge clue; this constant allergic response can create a low-grade inflammatory environment that severely hampers nutrient absorption, effectively creating a "leaky gut" scenario independent of celiac damage. This is likely why your iron stores deplete so rapidly—your body is both unable to absorb it efficiently and may be losing it through inflammation. While the functional medicine path is expensive, it's clearly providing answers and relief that traditional gastroenterology, focused solely on the gluten-free diet and biopsy results, is missing. To move forward, continue the gut-healing protocols your functional doctor recommends (perhaps exploring alternative options to glutamine that won't irritate your cystitis), maintain your strict avoidance of all allergens and irritants, and know that true healing is a multi-faceted process. You might seek a second opinion from a different gastroenterologist who is more knowledgeable about non-responsive celiac disease and the complex interplay of food allergies and micronutrient absorption, but your current path, while costly, seems to be leading you toward the steady health you need.
    • knitty kitty
      Have you had a DNA test to look for Celiac disease genes?  If she doesn't have any celiac specific genes, look for another explanation.  If she does have Celiac genes, assume they are turned on and active Celiac disease is progressing.  All first degree relatives (mother, father, siblings, children) should be genetically tested as well.   Sometimes blood tests are ambiguous or false negatives if one has anemia, diabetes or thiamine deficiency.  Certain medications like antihistamines and steroids can suppress the immune system and result in false negatives or ambiguous results on antibody tests.  
    • Heatherisle
      That was just the visual report, so need to wait for confirmation or otherwise from the results. They did take a biopsy from the upper end of the duodenum(D1). D2 looked unremarkable on the camera. Just wish we didn’t have to wait so long for the results as she’s naturally a very anxious person. But thanks so much for taking the time to answer me
×
×
  • Create New...