Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anyone Do Both Enterolab & York Testing?


hathor

Recommended Posts

hathor Contributor

I'm not quite sure where forum this post belongs in, but here goes.

I received my Enterolab results a couple weeks ago and they showed an intolerance to everything tested (gluten, milk, egg, soy, and yeast). I can't say I've ever noticed a reaction to soy or yeast. I've been twisting and turning trying to cut out those two.

As I understand, Enterolab's method hasn't been published in a peer reviewed article or validated by others. Is the York testing more accepted? I'm wondering if it would be good to confirm that my saliva and blood results agree with the fecal results I've received.

I also wonder if I have any other sensitivities that I'm unaware of.

Of course, I'm kind of worried. I don't actually WANT anything more to try to avoid :blink:

This is the way I cope with things -- I research them to death. Last night I had a dream where I was reading ingredient labels -- that was it. I need a richer fantasy life, I think :lol:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



AndreaB Contributor

Hathor,

I had allergy/intolerance done by US Bioteks (through a doctor that I was referred to) and then did enterolab about 3 months later after being very gluten lite for about 2 months.

For my allergy intolerance I scored moderate on whole wheat, spelt and wheat gluten; low on rye and wheat gliadin. Enterolab was a 14.

Allergy intolerance for soy was moderate; enterolab was 15.

Allergy intolerance for dairy was low; enterolab was 7.

Rachel--24 Collaborator

York would be testing for IgG antibodies in the blood.

Enterolab tests for Iga antibodies in stool.

I'm not sure which antibodies York is looking for in saliva??

Its two completely different classes of antibodies....two different immune responses. It would be like comparing apples and oranges since they are not really the same type of test.

I wouldnt say that York testing is more "accepted". There is no food intolerance testing that is known to be completely accurate...there can be false negatives as well as false positives with York's intolerance testing.

I would say that these types of tests are for informational purposes only.....as they are not really diagnostic of anything and the tests arent completely reliable. An elimination diet is more valid then food intolerance testing.

I have lost faith in Enterolab and really dont put too much stock into their testing. I have had food intolerance testing in the past....although it wasnt through York. I went through Great Smokies...they tested over 100 foods and the results ended up being of no help to me.

Some people do benefit from the tests and others find that it didnt help....in most cases elimination diet works best.

Cottage-Soul Apprentice

If you want the IGg blood tests, go with a different company than York (now Optimum Health Resource Labs). I ordered one of the 96 food panel blood tests (for $379) back in August and didn't get results until January. I probably wouldn't have them at all except I happened to call once and someone actually answered the phone (they don't reply to emails either). The test was supposedly ready in October, so I can't fathom why it was never mailed. If you do a search for Optimum Health Resources you'll find a thread in which other people had the same experience as I did.

I was told via the results that I am sensitive to Gluten, wheat and dairy and have cut these out of my diet for the past 2 weeks. I've had no improvements as of yet...so I'm not even sure the results are accurate. I'll continue with the eliminations for a couple months and hope for better health. Not very encouraged at this point though. :(

hathor Contributor
York would be testing for IgG antibodies in the blood.

Enterolab tests for Iga antibodies in stool.

I'm not sure which antibodies York is looking for in saliva??

Its two completely different classes of antibodies....two different immune responses. It would be like comparing apples and oranges since they are not really the same type of test.

York has several different tests. The saliva one is for IgA antibodies to egg, gluten, milk, and soy. One blood test is for 96 foods and IgG as you say. Then they have another blood test described as follows: "IgA/IgG/IgM Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) Autoantibody Rapid Test will detect elevated levels of the antibodies associated with Celiac Disease and IgA-mediated gluten intolerance."

I know they are different tests. I thought if different tests from different labs lead to the same bottom line I might be more confident in the results. Or at least I can put my doubting relatives at ease. They think I need to have my blood tested. Frankly, the Enterolab results for gluten, milk, and egg are consistent with my real life experience, i.e., I eliminated them and I feel better. I have them and I feel bad. Presumably the third test should show the same thing as my Enterolab result for tTG.

It is the soy and yeast results I'm not sure of. I've never noticed a reaction to either. An IgA response to soy, albeit in saliva, would theoretically be shown by the first test. But are there different kinds of IgA responses? Obviously I'm still researching things. Yeast had what I would call a borderline response according to Enterolab. The only other testing I can find for it looks at IgG.

So foods you are intolerant to can cause IgA reactions but not IgG?

I wouldnt say that York testing is more "accepted". There is no food intolerance testing that is known to be completely accurate...there can be false negatives as well as false positives with York's intolerance testing.

That I know. The web site lists a number of studies as "validation," but I haven't tried to read up on them yet.

Things would certainly be easier if I could eat soy and yeast. I suppose I could go without for a period of time and then introduce them and see how I feel.

Why do you say Great Smokies' testing was of no use, if you don't mind my asking? Did they find intolerances that you don't notice in real life, fail to find ones you do, or both?

Given what Cottage_Soul said, I'm not inclined to go with York now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,976
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Redrayvyn
    Newest Member
    Redrayvyn
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like your gastroenterologist is becoming increasingly confident that celiac disease is the likely diagnosis based on both your older and newer lab results. Her suggestion to call each Monday for possible cancellations is actually a great strategy—especially given how long the wait is until your August 29th appointment. It’s also a good sign that she’s advocating for you to be seen sooner, which shows she’s taking your case seriously. The fact that some labs might not have been drawn yet due to overlap with your functional health doctor’s upcoming testing adds a layer of confusion, but that’s unfortunately common when multiple providers are involved. Hopefully, the GI’s remaining labs will still get processed, or she can reorder them if needed. As for the colonoscopy prep, it’s totally understandable that you're dreading it—many people rank it among the least pleasant medical experiences. You’re definitely not alone in preferring the pill prep option over the liquid kind, especially if you don’t drink Gatorade and had a rough experience with Miralax in the past. Hopefully, your doctor will approve the pill form, especially since you’ve tolerated other options poorly before. Fortunately, the upper endoscopy doesn’t require any bowel prep—just fasting, usually starting the night before—so that part should be easier to handle. It’s great that you’re already trying to boost your gluten intake, but yes, tracking gluten content can be surprisingly tricky. You’re right that the general rule for wheat-based products is to multiply the protein content by about 0.75 to estimate the gluten content. That means foods like oyster crackers, while convenient, may not pack enough gluten to help reach the recommended daily goal of around 10 grams before biopsy. It’s helpful that you caught that early, and switching to more gluten-dense foods like regular wheat bread, pasta, or wheat cereals might make it easier to hit your target. It’s not easy eating more gluten when you’re trying to manage symptoms or just not used to it, but doing so can make a big difference in ensuring your biopsies are accurate. You’re on the right track—hopefully with a little luck, you’ll get a cancellation and be seen sooner.
    • cristiana
      Thanks for sharing that film, @trents.  I am not sure how I missed that film as I see it is a few years old, but it is very good.  I think you should be fine if you take your own packed lunch and eat it from your own lunchbox etc.  Might be worth doing a lunchtime recce to see how cramped the room is before making a decision - for all you know, there may be other people  there who don't eat gluten?
    • cameo674
      The GI doc messaged me this afternoon that she believes that the new blood work added to the old is definitely  looking like a celiac diagnosis is in my future.  She wants to me to call into scheduling each Monday to see if I can get my August 29th appointment moved up due to cancellations.  I have never had a doctor recommend that.  She also said there were additional labs that she requested still out that have not come back yet; so, they may have been missed drawing those since the functional health doctor has a whole slew of labs that I am suppose to be waiting until August 27th to do. I am still waiting to hear on whether or not she will allow me to do pill prep versus the typical gatorade prep that I did 8 years ago for that colonoscopy.  I do not drink gatorade to begin with and that miralax prep kept me in the bathroom up until we drove to the procedure.  My younger brother said the pill form was fairly easy when the liquid form is hard to swallow. Colonoscopy prep is definitely close to number one on the list of things I never want to experience again if I could avoid it.  Number one is a different medication that caused severe cramping that had me in tears until it wore off.  Never having had an endoscopy, I have no idea of what that prep is like, but it cannot be worse right? I started munching on oyster crackers last night.  It is shocking how filling they are.  I just read that I need to pay attention to the protein content of the wheat bread product or I will miss the gluten goal of 10 g per day prior to testing.  The post said that I should look at the protein and multiple that number by .75 if it is a wheat flour product to see how much gluten is in it.  No more oyster crackers for me.  I would have to eat 10 oz bag everyday to meet my goal.  not going to happen.
    • Alibu
      Well, I've made if from the pre-diagnosis forum to here!  I've been diagnosed with "latent" or "potential" celiac and my doctor has suggested me to go gluten-free before my appointment with him in October (first available, LOL).  My ttg-iga was 152, my EMA was positive, I have the gene, but my biopsy was negative (and he took 12 samples), so it makes sense to go gluten free to see if I improve. I know the basics - I can find lists of things to avoid, I know about hidden dangers, etc. all of that.  Where I'm struggling is just STARTING.  I need to go shopping and stock up on some staples.  My goal is to not try to find gluten-free alternatives, but to focus on naturally gluten-free foods like proteins, veggies, fruits, and carbs like potatoes and rice.  However, the rest of the household will not be gluten-free, which is fine, I don't want them to for various reasons.  But I have SO much food in my house in the pantry and fridge and cabinets, and it feels like I need to get rid of a lot in order for me to start fresh, but at the same time, I can't get rid of everything. I guess it's just feeling overwhelming and I've never given up gluten before so this is going to be a huge shift for me and I feel like I need SPACE, but I can't quite have that. Any advice on just getting started and organizing myself would be great!  
    • Scott Adams
      It’s great that you were finally able to see a gastroenterologist—and even luckier to get in the same day as your referral! It sounds like your GI is taking a very thorough approach, which is reassuring given your complex symptoms and history. The confusion around your different tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody results is understandable. The variation between your December and June labs may be due to multiple factors, including differences in the lab performing the test (Quest vs. Mayo Clinic), the specific assay used, and the amount of gluten you had been consuming before each test. Antibody levels can drop significantly when gluten is reduced or eliminated from the diet, even partially, which might explain why your recent tTG IgA was now negative and your tTG IgG was borderline high. That’s likely why your GI mentioned it was “usually the reverse”—typically, tTG IgA is more commonly elevated in confirmed celiac, not IgG alone, especially when IgA levels are sufficient, as yours are. Your gene testing confirms that you carry HLA types (DQ2.2 most likely) that are permissive for celiac disease, meaning you can develop it, but not everyone with these genes will. These genes don’t explain why your symptoms are milder or different from others with celiac—many people have so-called "silent" or atypical presentations like yours, with issues like long-term heartburn, loose stools, nutrient intolerances, or just gradually adapting to symptoms over time. It’s not uncommon to assume these symptoms are just aging, medication side effects, or lifestyle-related until someone finally connects the dots. It’s a good thing your daughter advocated for you to be tested—many cases are missed for years because they don’t follow the “textbook” presentation. As for the immunoglobulin tests, your doctor likely ordered those to ensure your immune system is functioning normally, particularly your IgA level, since a deficiency can cause false-negative celiac blood tests. Since your IgA level is normal, your tTG IgA test should be reliable (assuming adequate gluten intake), but again, if you weren't eating enough gluten, that could explain the lower antibody levels now. The comprehensive metabolic panel and negative stool parasite results are additional pieces ruling out other causes of your symptoms, like infections or organ dysfunction. The upcoming endoscopy and colonoscopy should provide more definitive answers, especially with biopsies looking for celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and microscopic colitis. It’s completely valid to feel unsure about what you’re experiencing, especially when your symptoms have been lifelong or gradually worsening without being severe. You’re not alone—many adults with celiac or gluten-related disorders report subtle or chronic symptoms they’ve normalized. You’re doing the right thing by staying on gluten now through your procedure date in August. Try not to stress about reaching the full 6-slice equivalent each day, but do increase your gluten intake as much as tolerable (e.g., a couple of pieces of bread, pasta, crackers, etc.) to give the biopsy the best chance of detecting any damage. Good luck with your upcoming procedures—you’re closer than ever to answers and a clearer direction forward.
×
×
  • Create New...