Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

4 Y/o Daughter With Hla-dq8


texasblue

Recommended Posts

texasblue Newbie

I have been searching these boards and the net this last 2 weeks trying to gather more info.

The background: My middle daughter, she'll be 5 in June, is being evaluated for possible Celiac. The question of her having an intolerance was first brought up last spring when we thought she might have a severe lactose intolerance. She had been taking Lactaid milk since she was about 2 and we limited but did not eliminate dairy until last spring. She was starting to have explosive diarrhea then and I was noticing that her growth had really dropped off since she was 2 years old. (She was born in the 95th % and has slowed drifted down to now around the 20th percentile. Her weight was at the 95th as well and is now down around 70th so no, she's not a waif!). So, thinking that lactose was the issue, possibly, we took her off all straight dairy but did not hunt for milk in baked goods. She had a little improvement at first (with her gut issues, not with her growth) but has been starting to have a distended belly, lots of gas, and loose/diarrhea stools again in the last several months. A few weeks ago she was extremely distended and was having frequent complaints of her belly hurting so we took her back to the pediatrician to try and evaluate further. The pedi consulted with a couple of pedi GI docs and said that they would want to rule out Celiac first. So, the lab work we have so far is:

Total IgA level #1: 16 = Low

Total IgA level #2: 21 = low

IgA 1 = 21 low

IgA 2 <1 low

Total IgG =964 (normal between 353-1350) with IgG normal for subclasses 1,2 &3, borderline low for 4.

IgA TTG<3 (negative <5)

HLA-DQB1 03(DQ8)

HLA-DQB1 - (DQ-)

HLA-DQ2 negative

HLA-DQ8 positive

CBC panel was completely normal except for slightly high platelets.

TSH 1.63

She's scheduled for a small bowel biopsy for 4/17 but after reading so many posts on this board I am wondering how likely it will be that she even gets a positive result. Can anyone help me interpret these results? I know the DQ8 gene is the rarer of the two and that the low IgA is more common in celiacs than in the general population so I am guessing her chances of having it are greater than most, right?

Any light anyone can shed on this would be appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

I am not familiar with the numbers. Some of the moms should be here soon. I can reiterate what you probably know, testing with a biopsy is not always reliable in young children.

nora-n Rookie

Yes, celiac is more common in those 10% who have low IGA. One would then expect them to run the antigliadin and tissue transglutaminase tests in the IgG version.

They only checked for DQ2 and 8. They found the DQ8 which is 0302. DQ7,8 and 9 are all DQ3.

0202 and 0201 are both DQ1. 05* and 06* are DQ5 and 6, which are subtypes of DQ1.

Tehy probably know which subtypes she is, but did not tell you. there was a posting here or on another boeard a year ot so ago, someone talked to someone in charge of a lab that does these tests, and they do know the types, but the question was only to report if there is DQ2 or 8.

Anyway, it does look like celiac with those tests, but the Ttg- test and the biopsy are much more specific.

texasblue Newbie
Yes, celiac is more common in those 10% who have low IGA. One would then expect them to run the antigliadin and tissue transglutaminase tests in the IgG version.

Thank you so much for replying. My head is just spinning lately! Her biospy isn't until the 17th so I feel like I have a lot of time to think and wonder (and pray!).

You know, I was wondering why they didn't run the IgG AGA and TTG as well. It was my general pediatrician who was ordering the tests based on what she understood the GI docs to say. At our GI consult he mentioned that there were a few more tests he would have ordered but I guess she decided not to do them yet. I think after the DQ8 gene showed up they figured the best course of action was to go for the biopsy. At our GI consult on Thursday he pretty much said that he thought she was "a good candidate" for being Celiac based on her symptoms. Especially her short stature and drop on growth curve. There is some question whether she has difficulty processing other "sugars" like maltose, sucralose, etc. When he does the biopsies he is going to send one to check for an absence of the enzymes related to those sugars.

Do the subtypes matter very much? What kind of light will that shed on her probability of having Celiac?

Thanks again!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jen72
    Newest Member
    Jen72
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.