Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Which Will Show Up First?

sarahelizabeth

Recommended Posts

sarahelizabeth Contributor
sarahelizabeth
Posted

(I meant to post this in here ;))

A positive blood test or a positive biopsy??

I guess my question is does the intenstinal damage cause the bloodwork to show ++ or does the presense of the antibodies in the blood cause the intestinal damage?? Does that make sense at all??

Can you have ++ bloodwork and a negative biopsy?? And can you have neg bloodwork and a pos biopsy??

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted
(I meant to post this in here ;))

A positive blood test or a positive biopsy??

I guess my question is does the intenstinal damage cause the bloodwork to show ++ or does the presense of the antibodies in the blood cause the intestinal damage?? Does that make sense at all??

Can you have ++ bloodwork and a negative biopsy?? And can you have neg bloodwork and a pos biopsy??

Generally, the intestinal damage will cause the antibodies to show up in the blood.

But many here have had positive bloodwork and a negative biopsy (damage is easily missed), and there are others who've had negative bloodwork and a positive biopsy. The bloodwork is not terribly reliable. Which shows that neither one is very reliable, and trying the diet is the best test of them all. Because if you aren't intolerant to gluten, you won't get better. But if you are intolerant, the diet will make a big difference in your wellbeing.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted

Theoretically the blood work should show up first. The tTG test looks for tTG antibodies which is indicative of an autoimmune response occurring in the body. The result of that autoimmune response is the release of chemicals from immune cells that damage the intestine. This causes the flattened villi that is observed during a positive biopsy. From what I have read here it seems that there has to be a large amount of antibody circulating in the blood for the tTG test to be positive, so realistically both tests should be positive at about the same time.

Many people have had different combinations of positive and negative results--just read the signature lines! Medical opinions also differ widely.

momof2sn Apprentice
momof2sn
Posted
Theoretically the blood work should show up first. The tTG test looks for tTG antibodies which is indicative of an autoimmune response occurring in the body. The result of that autoimmune response is the release of chemicals from immune cells that damage the intestine. This causes the flattened villi that is observed during a positive biopsy. From what I have read here it seems that there has to be a large amount of antibody circulating in the blood for the tTG test to be positive, so realistically both tests should be positive at about the same time.

Many people have had different combinations of positive and negative results--just read the signature lines! Medical opinions also differ widely.

My daughter had negative biopsy and positive blood work. The ped GI did biopsy first and mistakingly forgot to do the blood work at the same time so a month later we had blood work and it was positive.

gfp Enthusiast
gfp
Posted
Generally, the intestinal damage will cause the antibodies to show up in the blood.

But many here have had positive bloodwork and a negative biopsy (damage is easily missed), and there are others who've had negative bloodwork and a positive biopsy. The bloodwork is not terribly reliable. Which shows that neither one is very reliable, and trying the diet is the best test of them all. Because if you aren't intolerant to gluten, you won't get better. But if you are intolerant, the diet will make a big difference in your wellbeing.

Blood work can be unreliable but usually because the correct procedures are followed...

When they are and a FULL suite is taken they are over 98% reliable....

Its not that you are wrong.. unfortunately your correct... but that is largely down to the MD's who don't realise we need to eat gluten or MD's who only specify partial tests etc.

Hassi-----zzgxz has a paper somewhere where they managed to get some dead bodies and do post mortems (He has so many I can't find it right now)... but the correleation between blood and post mortem examination of villi was 98%+...

This is the other problem on reliability of blood tests.... many +ve blood tests and negative biopsy and instead of the Dr. accepting they missed the damaged villi they say the blood tests are inacurrate.... add to this the numbers done on children where we know them to be unreliable...

Its completely possible of course there are better tests and the current full panel does miss the odd person... even under the best circumstances.... but I just wanted to say the IMPORTANT thing is to do it correctly... if you don't get a full panel and its -ve its pretty useless.... +ve always means positive (except for 1:10,000 of human error) ... even if its just to some degree but -ve can mean bad procedures, not eating gluten, patient too young... etc. etc.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
This is the other problem on reliability of blood tests.... many +ve blood tests and negative biopsy and instead of the Dr. accepting they missed the damaged villi they say the blood tests are inacurrate.... add to this the numbers done on children where we know them to be unreliable...

This is what the gastro that I took my son to tried to say. My son's tTG levels were 3x higher than normal and he had normal IgA and IgG. His pediatrician who ordered the tests told me to put him on a gluten-free diet, and by the time I went to see the gastro it was a month later. The gastro was pushing very hard for the gluten challenge and biopsy. He said that if the biopsy was negative that he did not have the disease and he could continue to eat gluten. He also said that celiac disease is not a spotty disease. Well, it's not to him if he has that opinion! <_< I was SO mad when I left his office. I will never go back to him again. I am waiting for another appointment for a second opinion, but honestly I do not expect much better from the next doctor.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kristina S
    Newest Member
    Kristina S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.