Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If I Knew Then, What I Know Now!


little d

Recommended Posts

little d Enthusiast

Hello all

This is long, so kick back, and hope that ya'll can give me your ideas.

If I knew then, what I know now I would not have gotten teste before starting the diet. Yesterday I went and got my lab results from my GI office, that I no longer go to. It has been almost a year for these labs, 3 dates 6/22/06, 8/21/06 and 9/08/06 I think that I understand these results, even though they say negative.

06/22/06 At this point I had been strickly Gluten free for 3months and the GI told me that it would not make a difference. Everything is in the normal, and seems to be very close to either end.

Celiac panel

Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 0

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 284

Metabolic Panel (14)

Glucose 91, BUN 9, Creatinine 0.9, Sodium 140, Potassium 3.9, Chloride 103, Carbon Dioxide 25, Calcium 9.8, Protein Total 7.5, Albumin 4.3, Globulin 3.2, A/G Ratio 1.3, Bili 0.5,

Alkaline Phosphatase 63, AST (SGOT) 14, ALT (SGPT) 12

Sedimentation Rate-Westergren 15

08/21/06 This is my Electrolyte Panel, and CBC before my Endo and colonscope and I had been gluten again at this point. Again everything is normal

E Panel

Sodium 138, Potassium 3.9, Chloride 105, Carbon Dioxide 23

CBC

WBC 5.0, RBC 4.31 Hemoglobin 13.4, Hematocrit 39.1, MCV 90.6, MCH 31.2, MCHC 34.4

RDW 13.3, Platelet count 332, Absolute Neutrophils 2920...Lymphocytes 1580...Monocytes 385...

Eosinophils 95...Basophils 20, Neutrophils 58.4, Lymphocytes 31.6, Monocytes 7.7,

Eosinophils 1.9, Basophils 0.4

09/08/06 At this point when I was told that my scopes where negative I started eating all regular food, gained all weight back that was lost while on diet, and got all my symptoms back in full force.

Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Ab

Cytoplasmic (C-ANCA) <1:20 Does not give what would be positive

Perunuclear (P-ANCA) <1:20

Atypical pANCA >1:20

Gliadin IgG/IgA Ab Prof, EIA

Antigliadin Abs, IgA 1

> are these the same as from the top or are these totoally differnt?

Antigliadin Abs, IgG 2

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Panel

Saccharomyces cervisiae, IgG

<20.0 negative

Saccharomyces cervisiae, IgG > what does equivocal 20.1 - 24.9 mean ??

<20.0 negative

Thank you to all for all the input of what ya'll think, Now I wish I had done testing before I started eating Gluten Free.

Donna


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sparkles Contributor

I am confused. If symptoms go away when you are gluten-free, why do you need tests and doctors to tell you that you have a problem with wheat or gluten? Would it be easier to stay on a gluten-free diet if you were given an actual diagnosis of celiac disease or gluten intolerance? In my humble opinion, we are the ones who have control over our bodies. We make decisions every day based on what we think and what we feel. Having a doctor tell me that I have no problem with gluten, when I have the big D, stomach cramps, gas, bloating, etc, when I eat it tells me that I do have a problem with gluten and no test in the world is going to convince me otherwise. I don't mean to be unsympathetic but we have problems based on eating gluten and if not eating gluten makes those problems (or most of them) disappear, it seems like a no brainer to me to just stop eating gluten. I know a young man who is 23 with an abdominal aorta anuerism. He is living with a time bomb inside him and there is nothing that he can do to make that time bomb go away. He has to hope that the docs who are treating him are able to make appropriate decisions. Whereas, celiacs or people who have gluten intolerance, have total control over their treatment.... stop eating gluten! There is nothing invasive about the "cure". I know that I have permanent problems caused from gluten.... neuropathy, for one.... and I had colon cancer linked I am sure to the celiac disease but I do have control over my diet. No test in the world would convince me that I can eat gluten again. I know how I feel. The docs don't and the tests certainly do not.

You might consider ignoring the tests and doing what your body tells you is right. A gluten free diet is not going to hurt you. It is a healthy diet.

mn farm gal Apprentice

I am another one that would never go by test results myself. I have doctored for years before even hearing about the disease and my test said neg, but I was gluten light for a year. Not for Celiac but because I was trying to loose some weight so I wasn't eating pasta, bread and baked goods. I know nothing about the test but I am sure someone will.

little d Enthusiast

sparkles

Yes you are right it would be easier for me with a diagnosis from a doctor to stay Gluten free and I do feel better when i am eating better for myself, but I am slowly coming to the reality that I not going to get what I am after. My husband is the type of person who will listen to what doctors say and will do what they say, but he is also that way about work issues as well, follow the rules and yes some of that mentallity has rubbed off on me. My mom did not take me to doctors when I was little and I only remember getting shots going to the community health clinic, We did not have a lot of money back then. So if I did go the doctor it was when I was sick with broncitis or the pnomonia. It was only until I got older that I would go to the doctor myself when I had a job in my early 20's that had insurance, that is when I got diagnosed with Karotosis polaris I know that is spelled wrong. I was very small (I'm still small)in stature when I was little maybe to the point of failure to thrive, I don't know but my mom who I love very much was very backwoods back then. She was dirt poor when she was growing up and didn't think that it was too important. But now she takes good care of her health because of us kids who hound her about her health. I can admite that I am learning about celiac disease and understanding more and trying to understand that getting a diagnoses is not important it is my body telling me what it needs not a doctor telling me. If I wasn't for me braking my foot March 20 when my GI called to see if I wanted to go to another GI I may have said yes, but I have to concentrate on getting my foot better so I'm not going to worry about that anymore, If I need any blood work done I'll just go to my Family doctor to check my levels every once in a while, which it has been a year since I last had any blood test done.

Donna

tiredofdoctors Enthusiast

Donna -- what were the values that were considered Within Normal Limits for the Westergren Sedimentation Rate? The fifteen caught my eye.

I'm a "neurological celiac". The only damage which has been done is to my cerebellum. All my antibodies were normal with the exception of the antigliadin antibodies, which were high. Those are what were damaging my cerebellum. My biopsy was negative, as well.

What is interesting, though, is that since I have been gluten-free, my "irritable bowel syndrome", or "ulcerative colitis", and all the other things that I was diagnosed with are gone. I haven't had one bout of diarrhea since being gluten-free, almost two years now.

I think if you FEEL better being gluten-free, to heck with the lab values. If your symptoms are decreasing, your energy is increasing and life is better, STAY gluten-free. It can't hurt, and if you're a neurological celiac, it will CERTAINLY prevent some pretty terrible stuff.

little d Enthusiast

tiredofdoctors

WOW! I had no idea that the Sedimentation could be a problem nuerologically, I belieave the normal range was 0 - 20 or 25 I can't remember I don't have the results in front of me because I'm at work. What are the neurological problems or symptoms of what you are talking about, I asked someone and now I can't find the post anywhere. But I felt that the Sedimentation rate was a little high myself. Had no idea that could be a factor in anything, I don't know much about chemistry, briefly touched it in Medical assisting school, did one on myself but had to leave for the day before I could see the results.

Thanks for responding

Donna

jacob'smom Newbie
tiredofdoctors

WOW! I had no idea that the Sedimentation could be a problem nuerologically, I belieave the normal range was 0 - 20 or 25 I can't remember I don't have the results in front of me because I'm at work. What are the neurological problems or symptoms of what you are talking about, I asked someone and now I can't find the post anywhere. But I felt that the Sedimentation rate was a little high myself. Had no idea that could be a factor in anything, I don't know much about chemistry, briefly touched it in Medical assisting school, did one on myself but had to leave for the day before I could see the results.

Thanks for responding

Donna


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jacob'smom Newbie

Have you ever heard of a genetic test for celiac disease? When my son was having trouble with diagnosis, we had a genetic test which confirmed that he carried the genetic component which could cause celiac disease. His case was then confirmed by the fourth or fifth biposy he had had. I guess we finally found the right doctor. I pursued testing and diagnosis because he is still in school and I needed backing to require the school to modify for the diet and to allow our modifications. I also wanted him to never have questions about why we were doing what we were doing for him and to try to avoid the teenage rebellion that I know is coming...

Hello all

This is long, so kick back, and hope that ya'll can give me your ideas.

If I knew then, what I know now I would not have gotten teste before starting the diet. Yesterday I went and got my lab results from my GI office, that I no longer go to. It has been almost a year for these labs, 3 dates 6/22/06, 8/21/06 and 9/08/06 I think that I understand these results, even though they say negative.

06/22/06 At this point I had been strickly Gluten free for 3months and the GI told me that it would not make a difference. Everything is in the normal, and seems to be very close to either end.

Celiac panel

Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 0

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 284

Metabolic Panel (14)

Glucose 91, BUN 9, Creatinine 0.9, Sodium 140, Potassium 3.9, Chloride 103, Carbon Dioxide 25, Calcium 9.8, Protein Total 7.5, Albumin 4.3, Globulin 3.2, A/G Ratio 1.3, Bili 0.5,

Alkaline Phosphatase 63, AST (SGOT) 14, ALT (SGPT) 12

Sedimentation Rate-Westergren 15

08/21/06 This is my Electrolyte Panel, and CBC before my Endo and colonscope and I had been gluten again at this point. Again everything is normal

E Panel

Sodium 138, Potassium 3.9, Chloride 105, Carbon Dioxide 23

CBC

WBC 5.0, RBC 4.31 Hemoglobin 13.4, Hematocrit 39.1, MCV 90.6, MCH 31.2, MCHC 34.4

RDW 13.3, Platelet count 332, Absolute Neutrophils 2920...Lymphocytes 1580...Monocytes 385...

Eosinophils 95...Basophils 20, Neutrophils 58.4, Lymphocytes 31.6, Monocytes 7.7,

Eosinophils 1.9, Basophils 0.4

09/08/06 At this point when I was told that my scopes where negative I started eating all regular food, gained all weight back that was lost while on diet, and got all my symptoms back in full force.

Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Ab

Cytoplasmic (C-ANCA) <1:20 Does not give what would be positive

Perunuclear (P-ANCA) <1:20

Atypical pANCA >1:20

Gliadin IgG/IgA Ab Prof, EIA

Antigliadin Abs, IgA 1

> are these the same as from the top or are these totoally differnt?

Antigliadin Abs, IgG 2

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Panel

Saccharomyces cervisiae, IgG

<20.0 negative

Saccharomyces cervisiae, IgG > what does equivocal 20.1 - 24.9 mean ??

<20.0 negative

Thank you to all for all the input of what ya'll think, Now I wish I had done testing before I started eating Gluten Free.

Donna

little d Enthusiast

The sedimentation rate values are for 0-20 I looked it up. Is 15 a little too high

Donna

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,625
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Barb2
    Newest Member
    Barb2
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
    • trents
      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
    • Xravith
      Thank you, really.  I took a test for DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG. Effectively, it is not enough to discard Celiac Disease. I was consuming gluten until then, I only started gluten-free some days ago, when the symptoms became horrible and now I feel considerably better, which is a second confirmation that gluten is the main problem. It's been more than 4 years I have the same suspect, when I first thought gluten was causing me problems, I made a gluten-free diet for a year, I felt really good as never before. However, neither I or my parents were well informed about Celiac disease, so none of us tried to make further exams. My father suffer digestive problems and other members of my family as well. Unfortunately, no one have ever been tested for Celiac disease. I'll have to restart eating gluten in the next weeks, so I can make a serious blood test in laboratory, hopefully between two or three months.
    • trents
      As Scott said, in order for celiac disease testing to be valid, you need to be eating generous amounts of gluten on a regular basis for weeks or months before the blood draw. The blood tests are designed to detect antibodies that the immune system produces in response to the ingestion of gluten. It takes time for them to build up in the blood to detectable levels.
    • Scott Adams
      Based on what you've described, it is absolutely crucial that you pursue further medical exams for Celiac Disease and related conditions with a gastroenterologist. Your symptoms—especially the worsening fatigue, loss of muscle mass, neurological symptoms like migraines, and palpitations, coupled with being underweight—are significant red flags that extend beyond typical IBS. The negative home test is not reliable, particularly given your concern about sample contamination and the fact that you were likely not consuming sufficient gluten at the time for the test to be accurate, which is a common issue. While probiotics like Bifidobacterium Infantis can support gut health, they cannot resolve an autoimmune response to gluten or heal intestinal damage caused by Celiac Disease. Your declining blood test results, even if still "in range," further indicate a trend that needs a doctor's investigation. Please do not hesitate to seek a specialist; a formal diagnosis is the first step toward getting the correct treatment, allowing your body to heal, and finally addressing your weight and overall health concerns. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.