Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Blood Tests, Positive Biopsy --what Does This Mean?


poet925

Recommended Posts

poet925 Newbie

Hi all. I"m relatively new here. I don't have a celiac dx yet but I was scoped while in the hospital a couple years ago for severe abdominal pain (turned out to be an ovarian cyst). The biposy showed intestinal damage consistent with gluten-sentivity enteropathy (or some similar word that when I looked it up seemed to be an old-fashioned term for celiac). I started a gluten free diet and followed up with GI who ordered blood tests and told me that since my blood tests came back negative, I do not have celiac. Hello?! That's like the opposite of everything I read then which said the biopsy was the gold standard for diagnosing celiac. I've decided I want this checked into again and have found a specialty clinic in the area that I think I'll go to. I'm curious though. Does what the previous GI said to me sound right to you all or does it sound like he really didn't know much about celiac? Thanks so much for any replies.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Your GI sounds like an idiot.

If you had blood work done after starting gluten free diet, of course your results will be negative!

Take your biopsy results with you to the specialty clinic--there should be absolutely NO need for a repeat. Once you have celiac, you always have celiac. You can't turn it off.

Welcome to gluten-free land! It's SO much better than most of us ever though it could be--both in terms of tasty food we can eat (LOTS of great substitutes available, unlike, say, 5 years ago) and in terms of how much better we feel off gluten. LOTS of support available here!

Osprey101 Newbie
Your GI sounds like an idiot.

:lol:

Amen to that!

After enough time without wg in your diet, your labs will show a reduced antibody response. One lab says they'll still show up even after 1-2 weeks of dietary exclusion, but why guess? If the biopsy shows the villi were damaged, that's a good reason to believe a celiac diet is good for you.

Really the "gold standard" test is dietary exclusion. If you cut out the wg and you get better- followed by a challenge in which re-introduction of wg in which symptoms reappear- that's a very, very good sign that wg is something that doesn't agree with you, and does not belong in your diet.

Good luck!

poet925 Newbie

I had only been gluten free for about 2 weeks if that when the bloodwork was done. I'm going to a support groupmeeting/mini-conference next Saturday with an MD in attendance (actually a colleague in the same group as the prior guy as it turns out), so I guess I will see what I can find out there too. I have to say I'm quite worried about starting the diet. Our budget is so stretched thin and with dh facing a possible lay-off in a week, I can't afford specialty items. Last time I only did the diet briefly and I'd been so sick with the cyst and also with the meds they'd given me for constipation that it hurt to eat. So I wasn't that hungry and basically did things like, cook a large pot of mashed potatoes and subsist on that and meat for a few days, then cook another pot, lol.

There really is no need to repeat the biopsy? I was thinking I should not start the gluten-free diet until I see the new specialist but now I'm thinking, do I really need to wait? Maybe I will ask them when I schedule an appt. The diet has seemed to read about it like a big deal managing to find the hidden gluten in everything that it's been a daunting task to think about to say the least- esp. since I already follow a no dairy products diet due to an allergy. I've never been strict about that though, if something has a tiny bit of milk in it, I do eat it but maybe now is the time to tighten that up too? (And no it's not lactose intolerance, it's an allergic reaction to casein, the protein in the milk.) Thanks for your suggestions and for letting me vent.

Guest j_mommy

Yup I would say Celiac!!!!!

Just remember if you choose to have another biopsy done you need to be eating gluten for the test results to be "true", same with blood tests!

good Luck!

Nancym Enthusiast

You don't need to buy specialty items. Meat, veggies, fruit, nuts, etc are all gluten free.

gfpaperdoll Rookie

yes, defintely celiac, even with a positive biopsy. Not to mention your casein problem which is a big tip off, most people that have a dairy problem also have a gluten problem. & yes you should not cheat on dairy even a tiny bit - dairy is very damaging to your body...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.