Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Re-checks, Diet Compliance; When To, Who To See?

maddycat

By maddycat
in Doctors

Recommended Posts

maddycat Contributor
maddycat
Posted

Background: I was 'diagnosed' with celiac in August of 2006. Some of the dr's I saw knew what it was, some knew a bit more, but alas, my health plan is an HMO, so I didn't expect too much! My IGG and IGA came back slightly elevated in the equivocal range (did not have a "full panel" of blood work done and did not know that I should have until too late) and my dr. told me to eat gluten free while I waited to get in to see a GI dr...2 months later. Of course, I did not know that you couldn't eat gluten free then have a biopsy so, it was too late for me. I did not have a biopsy.

When I was diagnosed, I had just had my first child 3 months earlier and was breastfeeding full time. They ran numerous tests after diagnosis including a bone density scan (which cam back as positive for Osteopenia, but now I am wondering if my pregnancy and breastfeeding had effected this test result). They also checked vitamin levels via blood work, which mostly came back normal. The rhumatologist I met with told me to come back in two years to repeat the bone density scan and a general recheck.

What timeline for dr's is recommended? Should I see a dr now, to get things checked out, to check diet compliance, etc? I am also interested in getting genetic testing done since I wasn't able to have a biopsy- I think it would give me piece of mind. Which dr. should I see, my general practitioner, the rhumatologist or the GI?

Sorry, there are so many questions- thanks for reading, and helping!

Marcia

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted

I think it's best to get your blood work redone after 6-12 months. If you want genetic testing done I would go through Enterolab, it's pretty cheap as far as lab work goes--only $150. This way only you know the results.

Open Original Shared Link

maddycat Contributor
maddycat
Posted
  • Author
If you want genetic testing done I would go through Enterolab, it's pretty cheap as far as lab work goes--only $150. This way only you know the results.

Thanks for the link. Do you recommend this so that it doesn't go on my record- for future insurance problems- if I did have a proper diagnosis? If I do it through my dr, does insurance generally cover gene testing, or not?

disneyfan Apprentice
disneyfan
Posted
Background: I was 'diagnosed' with celiac in August of 2006. Some of the dr's I saw knew what it was, some knew a bit more, but alas, my health plan is an HMO, so I didn't expect too much! My IGG and IGA came back slightly elevated in the equivocal range (did not have a "full panel" of blood work done and did not know that I should have until too late) and my dr. told me to eat gluten free while I waited to get in to see a GI dr...2 months later. Of course, I did not know that you couldn't eat gluten free then have a biopsy so, it was too late for me. I did not have a biopsy.

When I was diagnosed, I had just had my first child 3 months earlier and was breastfeeding full time. They ran numerous tests after diagnosis including a bone density scan (which cam back as positive for Osteopenia, but now I am wondering if my pregnancy and breastfeeding had effected this test result). They also checked vitamin levels via blood work, which mostly came back normal. The rhumatologist I met with told me to come back in two years to repeat the bone density scan and a general recheck.

What timeline for dr's is recommended? Should I see a dr now, to get things checked out, to check diet compliance, etc? I am also interested in getting genetic testing done since I wasn't able to have a biopsy- I think it would give me piece of mind. Which dr. should I see, my general practitioner, the rhumatologist or the GI?

Sorry, there are so many questions- thanks for reading, and helping!

Marcia

Hopefully I can help with a couple of things because I have osteopenia too.

It is possible that while you were pregnant, you were losing calcium because your baby takes calcium from you. If you were not absorbing enough calcium because of malabsorption issues, that would explain the diagnosis of osteopenia. I had a positive IGG and Endomysial Antibody test, and did not have a biopsy. I did go to a GI, he told me it was all in my head. I decided to go gluten free on my own, and the improvements have been great. You should repeat the bone density test in August 08. You said they tested your vitamin levels but did they test for Vitamin D? Vitamin D is very important for osteopenia/osteoporosis. I have been on a high weekly dose for about a year to impove my bone density. Since I have been gluten free, my absorption has been so much better and my tests have all been normal.

I would try to find an endocrinologist for the osteopenia issues. Then, since you have the positive IGG, and if you are responding to a gluten free diet, I would not go back to eating gluten just to have a biopsy. Most of the time, a positive diet response is the biggest sign.

Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.