Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Tyson


MNBeth

Recommended Posts

MNBeth Explorer

Last week I found some Tyson Polish Kielbasa at Costco, and tried to find out whether it contained gluten. There was no phone # on the package, so I called Costco. ( From inside the Costco ;-) . Those are big stores and I was faaaar away from the customer service desk!) Anyway, they didn't know a thing about it. So I called my husband and had him check the website. No info there, either, but a phone #. Called that; they're closed on Saturday.

So later I sent an e-mail through their website asking if their Polish Kielbasa sold through Costco contained gluten. Following is the completely unhelpful response I received:

"Thank you for contacting us via the Internet regarding Ingredients in

our Tyson Foods, Inc. products. In order to verify ingredients in our

products we must have a product UPC bar code(proof of purchase). I

apologize, but we do not maintain a list of products free of allergens.

Although, in an effort to improve awareness of potential food allergens

we have initiated a proactive step towards identifying and labeling

packaged products that contain known allergens.

The top eight major food allergens are:

Shellfish

Milk

Eggs

Peanuts

Fish

Soy

Tree Nuts

Wheat

Thank you,

Leslie Hickman

Consumer Relations"

I responded by pointing out that I don't plan to purchase the product first and then find out whether I can eat it. And that it was hard to see how following labeling laws constituted "initiating a proactive step," and that gluten isn't covered by the law in any case. And that celiacs were a rapidly growing and well-connected community that keeps track of the helpful vs. the unhelpful food companies. Probably won't make a difference, but you do what you can.

I had read here that Tyson was a "safe" company that labeled their products for gluten, but I can hardly believe that's the case if even the customer service representative can't tell me the status of a product w/o a bar code.

Argh. ;)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hez Enthusiast

The food "allergy" law does not cover gluten, only wheat which is a top 8 allergen. Hopefully, with the new gluten-free law (currently in the works) it will clear up confusion.

Hez

JennyC Enthusiast

I called Tyson a couple of months ago to ask about their sausage patties that I bought at Costco and they told me that they will disclose any gluten in the ingredients list. The key is to look up the company website, then find their contact information. I know it's a pain. :blink: Costco is not very helpful, which is why I try to avoid buying their Kirkland brand food on a matter of principle.

MNBeth Explorer
I called Tyson a couple of months ago to ask about their sausage patties that I bought at Costco and they told me that they will disclose any gluten in the ingredients list. The key is to look up the company website, then find their contact information. I know it's a pain. :blink: Costco is not very helpful, which is why I try to avoid buying their Kirkland brand food on a matter of principle.

I did go to their website and call, but they were closed, so I e-mailed. If they are so careful to disclose gluten in their ingredients, I wonder why the person who responded to my e-mail wasn't aware of it. Makes me nervous.

On the other hand, I've always gotten prompt answers from Costco about Kirkland products. Guess it all depends on who you talk to - though it shouldn't!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.