Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Re-challenge


RebeccaAlys

Recommended Posts

RebeccaAlys Newbie

My gastroenterologist in college (in NY) diagnosed me with celiac disease due to clear symptoms, family history, and blood test results. He informed me to go on a gluten-free diet and all would be well. I did and I have kept strictly to it since then (6 years). 6 months ago my GP (now in MA) recomended that I see a gastroenterologist here in New England.

I did and he was uncomfortable with the fact that I never had an endoscope diagnosis. I told him that I felt comfortable with it because I would be on a gluten-free diet anyway since my symptoms are so severe. He seemed to be ok with that.

I went for a checkup on Friday and now he really wants me to do a gluten challenge (10g of bread 4-6 weeks) and have an endoscope done. The only issue is my main symptoms are constipation (5-6 days) and incredible intestine pain. (I had appendicitis 4 years ago and didn't go to the hospital for 2 days because I thought I had eaten some hidden wheat.)

What do I do? Do I need a new doctor? Do I take the challege? What if it hurts so bad I can't go to work? Please help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi Rebecca, and welcome to this board.

Your new GI is wrong. You have your diagnosis, you know gluten makes you ill, and there is NO POINT in making you ill again, just because this doctor doesn't agree with the previous one!

Constipation and intestinal pain are common celiac disease symptoms. Your new GI seems to be one of those ignorant doctors who think that you can't have celiac disease if you don't have diarrhea and weight loss. In fact, the minority of celiacs have those symptoms!

You have been on a gluten-free diet for 6 years. Your villi have healed. If you do a gluten challenge now, you would destroy your villi again (and it would likely be more like three months to a year before that happens and your blood work and biopsy MIGHT be positive), which could result in permanent damage and could trigger other autoimmune diseases. Not to mention that you would likely end up very ill.

Please don't do it. If he insists, switch doctors.

lizard00 Enthusiast

Would he settle for running a genetic test on you? Thankfully this was the option my GI came up with and my bloodwork was negative. He just really wants to know if I have Celiac or not to monitor me down the road. I told him I really didn't need a diagnosis, and I wasn't going to eat gluten to have it. So, he suggested the DNA test and that was good enough for both of us. I understand his concerns in having a diagnosis, although the truth be told I really DON'T want a dx in my records. But... he is comfortable with whatever the DNA results are and the positive dietary response.

Did he say why it was so important for him to do an endoscopy on you with your previous GI's dx and your dietary response?

Phyllis28 Apprentice

I agree with Ursa Major. I have only an upper GI and response to a gluten free diet that was the basis for my diagnosis and I would run, not walk, away from any doctor who was insistant on doing a gluten challege.

I have had enough accidental glutenings in the last 30 years to know gluten makes me sick.

Simply say, no. Find another GI if this one will not accept your decision not to do a gluten challege.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.