Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Could My Physician Have Been Mistaken?


Woolygimp

Recommended Posts

Woolygimp Contributor

I've got red blistery bumps along my chest/shoulders and across my back and chest. When I was young, prior to actually start having the IgA response caused by Celiac at 17, I never had a problem with acne or blisters and this skin problem only started appearing afterwards. I went in for a biopsy with a dermatologist to check whether or not it was DH. The doctor that took the biopsy was just out of med school and was relatively inexperienced; he said that that it wasn't DH and instead prescribed me acne vulgaris medication.

When I look online for pictures of DH, it's odd that all of them look differently. My condition definitely resembles some of the pictures shown.

I was then diagnosed with Celiac a few months after that and this 'acne' is one of my biggest gauges for when I accidentally gluten myself. If I don't make mistakes they slowly fade away, but when I make one they flare up and actually develop instead blisters with pus.

Is there any chance this dermatologist made the wrong diagnosis? Before even taking the biopsy he seemed pretty adamant about it being acne. I'm definitely Celiac, but if it's just acne I probably need to use medication...even though a strict diet definitely makes it fade away...slowly.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ohsotired Enthusiast

How was the biopsy done? Directly on top of one of the bumps, or immediately next to it?

It's my understanding that in order for the biopsy to be accurate, it needs to be taken from the area right next to it rather than right on top of it.

Woolygimp Contributor
How was the biopsy done? Directly on top of one of the bumps, or immediately next to it?

It's my understanding that in order for the biopsy to be accurate, it needs to be taken from the area right next to it rather than right on top of it.

I couldn't tell. This was several months back and he didn't tell me anything as far as the procedure and I didn't know to request a side biopsy.

This would be what it most closely resembles.

Open Original Shared Link

Ursa Major Collaborator

People have had their DH 'diagnosed' being all kinds of different skin problems. Of course the doctor could have been wrong, lots of dermatologists know next to nothing about DH (just like a lot of GI docs know precious little about celiac disease).

I believe that you have DH, period. And the only thing that keeps it in check is the gluten-free diet.

YoloGx Rookie

I have gotten acne even though I have celiac--and have had celiac since I was an infant. The acne for me comes from eating sugar, of which I am also very sensitive especially since I have to control the fungal/candida overgrowth pretty carefully since I have had too many antibiotics along the way since I wasn't told I had celiac until recently. If I am CC'd I often get canker sores amongst other symptoms, but not acne. Though eating gluten or getting CC does increase my tendency even more to having fungal overgrowth etc. I thus just avoid it now if its at all possible.

I fear that your doc may want to give you antibiotics to cure the acne. Honestly it doesn't work. What works is diet--avoiding sugar and bleached flours of whatever type, anything that goes to sugar quickly. Its good too sometimes to flush out your over burdened liver with things like dandelion root or silymarin caps and oregon grape root or yellow dock etc. Also eating lots of greens really helps and bulking agents like fresh ground up flax seed once or twice a day (1 tablespoon before being ground in a coffee grinder with 1/4 tsp apple pectin) mixed in plenty of water.

My understanding DH causes an itch as well as a bump etc. that doesn't easily go away even when one has gone off gluten. My mom's however always get worse when she goes off diet--plus the area around her eyes get red. It can take a year or two from what I hear to rid oneself of DH. Again I bet the dandelion and other liver cleansing herbs as well as lots of veggies etc. would help with that too. Just avoid ones like burdock that stimulate your immune system -- since that is the last thing we need given our over-active (auto) immune systems.

Bea

ravenwoodglass Mentor

It does sound like DH. If it is you will find that it does clear up gluten free. You should see a decrease in the amount of NEW lesions pretty soon although it can take up to 3 months for the ones you have presently to heal completely. However the antibodies will remain in the skin for up to 2 years before they can be completely gotten rid of by your body. During this time even the smallest amount of CC will reactivate them. My first couple years gluten-free the lesions were the first indication I got into something gluteny, but they were not as bad as when on the full gluten diet. I have now been gluten-free going on 6 years. My skin is clear and my hair has grown back but the slightest amount of gluten will still cause hair loss and a very minor DH breakout, usually one lesion the size of a pencil eraser instead of the oozing sores that would cover one side of my face or legs or arms or back. They also show up last now instead of first. The antibodies have cleared my skin and it now takes a few days for them to build up enough to cause a lesion.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.