Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Benefit To Getting Tested And Diagnosed Officially?


Live4Hiking

Recommended Posts

Live4Hiking Rookie

After having years of joint pain and diagnosed incorrectly with RA as well as having non specific "food hangovers" or "food poisonings", I finally went on a gluten free diet for the last 2 months and wow! I feel like my old self again. Is there any reason to now go in a see a doc to get a blood test and/or biopsy to confirm what I already know - I cant eat glutens and feel ok?

BTW - I decided to go gluten-free after stumbling upon this site and reading all the symptoms and amazing recoveries. So thank you, to all of you!!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

The tests will be inaccurate now. Some say you have to eat a fair amount of gluten EVERYDAY for 3 or 4 months for the tests to MAYBE come out positive.

You have your answer.

Congratulations!!!

Lockheed Apprentice

I think the only reason to do it right now is if you need to claim some sort of resulting disability or work accommodation. I came out incredibly ambigious on all my testing except food sensitivity (which shows wheat rye barley oat amaranth millet and hops - so I have something a little more broad spectrum than just gluten going on for whatever reason). My biopsy was inconclusive and my blood test came back with one positive marker and one negative marker so one of them is false. But given that I was having so many issues I did an elimination diet and a gluten challenge and man I just can't eat gluten for sure. I think you have about as firm of a diagnosis as you'll ever have with the current technologies available.

Live4Hiking Rookie
I think the only reason to do it right now is if you need to claim some sort of resulting disability or work accommodation. I came out incredibly ambigious on all my testing except food sensitivity (which shows wheat rye barley oat amaranth millet and hops - so I have something a little more broad spectrum than just gluten going on for whatever reason). My biopsy was inconclusive and my blood test came back with one positive marker and one negative marker so one of them is false. But given that I was having so many issues I did an elimination diet and a gluten challenge and man I just can't eat gluten for sure. I think you have about as firm of a diagnosis as you'll ever have with the current technologies available.

Thanks you guys!!! That was my gut (no pun intended!) feeling, thanks for verifying.

Katsby Apprentice

I am kind of glad I didn't get an official diagnosis mainly because insurance can't turn me down if there's nothing stating that I have Celiac Disease in writing. I think the only benefit is if you are able to get support from an official diagnosis. I think in some countries they give financial aid.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,326
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PattyPagnanelli
    Newest Member
    PattyPagnanelli
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
    • Jane02
      Thanks @Scott Adams. Do you know if Kirkland Signature supplements share facility and production lines with other products containing gluten?  I'm worried that I'll react to this brand just like I did with other gluten-free labelled supplement brands. 
    • Matthias
    • Scott Adams
      This is a really common area of confusion. Most natural cheeses (cheddar, Swiss, mozzarella, Parmesan, brie, camembert, and most blue cheeses) are inherently gluten-free, and you’re right that the molds used today are typically grown on gluten-free media. The bigger risks tend to come from processed cheeses: shredded cheese (anti-caking agents), cheese spreads, beer-washed rinds, smoke-flavored cheeses, and anything with added seasonings or “natural flavors,” where cross-contact can happen. As for yeast, you’re also correct — yeast itself is gluten-free. The issue is the source: brewer’s yeast and yeast extracts can be derived from barley unless labeled gluten-free, while baker’s yeast is generally safe. When in doubt, sticking with whole, unprocessed cheeses and products specifically labeled gluten-free is the safest approach, especially if you’re highly sensitive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.