Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can I Just Assume It's Celiac's Now?


3groovygirls

Recommended Posts

3groovygirls Contributor

Hi everyone! I've been on periodically...

My DD is now 16 months and they suspect Celiac's. She followed a typical course, when I was nursing her she was super fussy if I ate anything with wheat, introduced solids and she had constant diarrhea and vomiting (aka, "reflux"), anyway, she lost weight, got FTT, was horribly sick her first year. Once we cut out gluten she's been fine, gaining weight back, sleeping through the night etc.

So anyway, NOW she's so sensitive to gluten if she even eats a product that is cross contaminated with gluten she has diarrhea for 2 days. Sometimes she even vomits immediately (as happened one time with a whole wheat cracker)

She hasn't had any of the testing b/c she's so young and also b/c she's gluten free, but with responses like that can I just assume it's Celiacs??

I'm just curious what you all think since you've BTDT!

Linda


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nitu-752002 Apprentice

I am not an expert and new myself to all this but do you know if its gluten or wheat? It could be wheat intolerance but if she is doing well on the new diet, i guess it doesnt hurt to keep her on it!

Nitu

ShayFL Enthusiast

You can "assume" anything, but if she doesnt have POS blood and/or biopsy the medical community as a whole would not dx her. If it were me, I would push for genetic testing for her to see if she even has the genes. If she doesnt have the genes there is still a tiny possibility that it is Celiac (very tiny), but with MUCH LESS probability. You could be comfortable thinking it is an intolerance then. If she does have the genes, then if it were me and my child, with POS response to the diet and the genes, I would "assume" she shouldnt eat gluten for the rest of her life.

3groovygirls Contributor

Crud. I guess I was hoping they could say it without doing all the testing. I can't imagine putting her back on gluten for testing - I don't even know how she wouldn't, quite literally, get sick and die on gluten. Seriously she was SO SICK with vomiting and diarrhea it was a a stomach bug for 2 days each time she ate it. And she should be on it for 6 weeks before? ACK!

I guess I'm afraid I'll NEVER get an answer if we have to do that so I was looking for an easy way out, KWIM?

Tell me about the gene test? I asked my DD's Dr. and she said that the only gold standard was still the biopsy and not that test. But she's a ped, not a GI - who would I see for the gene test, a GI??

3groovygirls Contributor

Shoot, I forgot to answer one of the questions - it's all gluten, not just wheat. She can't eat barley either. Same thing. Haven't tried rye b/c she's only 16 months old and I don't know what I'd feed her with rye, LOL!

mftnchn Explorer

It seems to me that with her degree of sensitivity it would be dangerous to put her on gluten just for testing.

3groovygirls Contributor

Yes, that's what her Ped. said, that's why I was looking for some easy assumption, you know?

I'm interested in the gene test though! That would be very interesting since one of my other DD's had suspceted Celiacs as well! (her blood test came out negative but she was only 18 months when it was done, if one DD had the gene I would get my other DD retested). Do all GI's do it, or do I have to see a gene Dr?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I think you have your diagnosis, and it's very clear--wheat causes problems, and not just moderate problems, but SEVERE problems. If you knew she reacted to peanuts, would you put her ON peanuts just to make a test come out positive?.

I don't know that you need anything official from a doctor. In fact, there have been cases where people have been DENIED insurance based on a celiac diagnosis, so you might be better off without it.

It would be interesting seeing the genetics, but again, those could potentially be used against her (I do NOT trust the insurance industry these days), so I would pursue genetic testing via Enterolabs and pay privately, out of pocket.

As was said above, there are cases of people who do NOT have the supposed celiac genes (2 genes are recognized here in this country, but SEVEN are recognized in Europe and Asia), who still have biopsy-diagnosed celiac.

I think the reason it appears to be a tiny chance that you would lack those genes and still have celiac is that very few people without those genes have even been tested for celiac. Also, we all know that many people have "tested" negative for celiac, but have every symptom, prompting the question, "Do we call them celiac or gluten intolerant?"

There are people with DH who tested negative, both for bloodwork and intestinal damage. But they obviously have celiac. It's looking more and more likely that there are many manifestations of celiac, and they don't always cause villi damage--which totally turns the "gold standard" of diagnosis on its head.

In the long run, though, it doesn't really matter what you call it if the outcome is the same.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

Forgot to add--sounds like your pediatrician is a keeper, if he (or she??) was able to diagnose your child so quickly, and it also sounds like YOU are really on top of things!!!!

Welcome aboard!

ShayFL Enthusiast

If you want to pay for Genetics privately (so it isnt on her record) you can use Enterolab or Kimball.

3groovygirls Contributor

Thanks guys!

My ped. actually knows a TON about Celiacs because both her husband and son have it!! So when she saw what was happeneing with Violet it reminded her exactly of her son (her son is only a year older than Violet). So I think she is a great ped, but also it helps that she has personal experience.

VERY interesting about the insurance. Maybe I should do pay out of pocket!

MarsupialMama Apprentice

If she is only 16 months old, I wouldn't bother with tests unless you really want to do it, because they are very unreliable, ESPECIALLY until the age of 6. The tests themselves have flaws. Many people can test negative for everything, but the fact is, they react the same (badly!) when they consume gluten.

From your daughter's response, I would for sure not put her BACK on gluten for the sake of any test or any diagnosis. We put our daughter on gluten-free before we knew about any testing, and she has responded so well that regardless what any test or doctor says, we will stick with the diet. When she grows up (like, say late teens?) if she wants to try gluten, she will have to deal with her own symptoms then, but as long as she is too small to understand the seriousness of the issue (we've had a traumatic experience!), we will do gluten-free.

ShayFL Enthusiast

Fortunately the genetic tests are very reliable. It is rare that they arent accurate. Of course nothing in medicine is 100%. A lab technician could be coming off a long night out on the town when he reads the results.....But I felt good about mine. I did Enterolab and Kimball and they were consistent with each other.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.