Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Stool Test


coldnight

Recommended Posts

coldnight Apprentice

From what I understand, this technically can't diagnose celiac disease, but can prove an immunological reaction to gluten?

Is this correct? Or can it indicate celiac disease? I wasn't going to do it, because the diet has been proof. I'm taking, I estimate, 1/20th of the medicine I was, and even that is too much. But, I guess I'm just neurotic? I need a name to put to this, something I can say, this is it. I'm positive wheat is it. But I don't know what to call it, or perhaps I'd like reassurance that wheat IS it beyond the effect of the diet.

I'm sure many of you have done this, did you find it helpful?

Thanks again.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lbd Rookie

This is a big issue on this forum. I, personally, found that the Enterolab test was very important for me because it confirmed what I already knew to be the truth - that I had a problem with gluten. In addition, it pinpointed a problem with casein, which was the key to ending my lifelong migraines. I knew the gluten-free diet was helping my health, but I guess I kept wondering if I was just imagining it. The Enterolab tests gave me the confirmation I needed to really pursue and stick to a gluten-free lifestyle. I looked carefully into the science behind it (I have a good science background) and am very satisfied that the tests are accurate and valid. Some will question if Enterolab can give a diagnosis, but there are so many problems with the blood tests and endoscopic procedures giving false negatives, that I question whether they are good diagnostic tools either.

Laurie

mftnchn Explorer

I agree with Laurie, Enterolab can be valuable when you carefully consider what it offers and your own situation. The gold standard is great when a person fits it, but many of us for one reason or another are left with a more nebulous situation in terms of a final diagnosis. And there are limitations to the "gold standard" approach, too.

I did Enterolab on a whim (it was recommended to my daughter by her doctor) when I was looking for answers to chronic constipation. By the time I got the results I was in China for 10 months and had no access to blood tests or biopsy (accurate ones at least). I can't find anyone here that has even heard of celiac disease, LOL! Anyway, I had phone consults with two of my doctors and both did NOT want me to wait to go gluten-free.

My Enterolab tests were startlingly positive. I am double DQ2, so these results plus response to gluten-free diet, plus profound malabsorption issues later confirmed with various tests, has given me a clinical diagnosis of celiac. I had a previous endoscopy (no biopsy) that has pix of the duodenum that are suggestive as well. It was done here in China and no suggestion was made of abnormality, plus they didn't keep any copies, so all I have is a tiny picture as evidence. I have also apparently had continuing villi damage because I haven't been digesting carbs (the digestive enzymes formed in the villi are inadequate), so now I am on SCD and finally seeing some improvement.

It took me a year to finally confirm the diagnosis in my own mind. I have weighed all the evidence, not just gone by the Enterolab. My doctors are fully convinced, but I don't expect that my Enterolab results will be convincing to most health practitioners. I may ask for a follow up biopsy this year.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,621
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kalderdice
    Newest Member
    kalderdice
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      The blood tests you had done are not the main ones. The two main ones are the "Total IGA" (to check for IGA deficiency) and the "TTG-IGA". Current guidelines for the "gluten challenge" when people have been gluten free for a significant time period are the daily consumption of at least10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks leading up to the day of the blood draw. That should give you some perspective.
    • Xravith
      Thank you, really.  I took a test for DGP-IgA and DGP-IgG. Effectively, it is not enough to discard Celiac Disease. I was consuming gluten until then, I only started gluten-free some days ago, when the symptoms became horrible and now I feel considerably better, which is a second confirmation that gluten is the main problem. It's been more than 4 years I have the same suspect, when I first thought gluten was causing me problems, I made a gluten-free diet for a year, I felt really good as never before. However, neither I or my parents were well informed about Celiac disease, so none of us tried to make further exams. My father suffer digestive problems and other members of my family as well. Unfortunately, no one have ever been tested for Celiac disease. I'll have to restart eating gluten in the next weeks, so I can make a serious blood test in laboratory, hopefully between two or three months.
    • trents
      As Scott said, in order for celiac disease testing to be valid, you need to be eating generous amounts of gluten on a regular basis for weeks or months before the blood draw. The blood tests are designed to detect antibodies that the immune system produces in response to the ingestion of gluten. It takes time for them to build up in the blood to detectable levels.
    • Scott Adams
      Based on what you've described, it is absolutely crucial that you pursue further medical exams for Celiac Disease and related conditions with a gastroenterologist. Your symptoms—especially the worsening fatigue, loss of muscle mass, neurological symptoms like migraines, and palpitations, coupled with being underweight—are significant red flags that extend beyond typical IBS. The negative home test is not reliable, particularly given your concern about sample contamination and the fact that you were likely not consuming sufficient gluten at the time for the test to be accurate, which is a common issue. While probiotics like Bifidobacterium Infantis can support gut health, they cannot resolve an autoimmune response to gluten or heal intestinal damage caused by Celiac Disease. Your declining blood test results, even if still "in range," further indicate a trend that needs a doctor's investigation. Please do not hesitate to seek a specialist; a formal diagnosis is the first step toward getting the correct treatment, allowing your body to heal, and finally addressing your weight and overall health concerns. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      I would only add that cross contamination with wheat may still be a possibility, so it's still best to seek out buckwheat that is labeled "gluten-free."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.