Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Question - Are There Different Reference Limits For Gluten Intolerance Versus Celiac?


Tim86

Recommended Posts

Tim86 Apprentice

I recently received my results from blood testing for Celiac. They are calling the results "negative for Celiac", since everything is within their reference limits. Are the limits different for gluten intolerance? For example, on the IgA, let's imagine there were a limit of 200 to indicate intolerance, but you have to be over 400 to call it Celiac. If that were true, I would be positive for gluten intolerance (I had a 247). Just wondering...because it seems that gluten intolerance is simply a milder version of Celiac.

My results:

Tiss Transglutamin IgA - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Tiss Transglutamin IgG - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Ab - 2.4 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgA Ab - 3.3 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Endomysial IgA Ab - Negative

IgA - 247 MG/DL (70-400 reference)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Korwyn Explorer
I recently received my results from blood testing for Celiac. They are calling the results "negative for Celiac", since everything is within their reference limits. Are the limits different for gluten intolerance? For example, on the IgA, let's imagine there were a limit of 200 to indicate intolerance, but you have to be over 400 to call it Celiac. If that were true, I would be positive for gluten intolerance (I had a 247). Just wondering...because it seems that gluten intolerance is simply a milder version of Celiac.

My results:

Tiss Transglutamin IgA - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Tiss Transglutamin IgG - 1 U/mL (0-3 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgG Ab - 2.4 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Anti-Gliadin IgA Ab - 3.3 U/mL (0-10 reference)

Endomysial IgA Ab - Negative

IgA - 247 MG/DL (70-400 reference)

Gluten intolerance is not just a milder version of Celiac. Celiac is a auto-immune disease triggered secondary to a pathological response to the gluten protein. Simple gluten intolerance will not cause auto-immune disorder. However that said, GI can be a sickening as celiac disease and can lead to a host of other issues such as leaky gut, which can cause a huge number of secondary or tertiary related conditions, not the least of which are nutrient deficiencies.

nora-n Rookie

This IgA test here is not a celiac test per se, it is to check if you are IgA deficient. 10% are IgA deficient and in that case, the IgA version of the tests here (ttg IgA, Antigliadin IgA) are not valid since the total Ig is low.

Yours is normal I think.

Note that your tests have a number, they are not 0, maybe that means something.

Those tests are calibrated so they do not turn positive until there is a lot of gut damage. Usually it is hard or impossible to detect early celiac. Scientists have tested relatives of celiacs over a period of years, and first the antigliadin IgG tests turned positive, then the others. (that is shy doctors regard those tests for unreliable, because they can tur out positive even though the biopsy is still negative)

Tim86 Apprentice
Gluten intolerance is not just a milder version of Celiac. Celiac is a auto-immune disease triggered secondary to a pathological response to the gluten protein. Simple gluten intolerance will not cause auto-immune disorder.

If they are not the same thing, then does gluten intolerance require the same "all or nothing" approach to a gluten-free diet as Celiac? For example, if you unknowingly consume a small amount of gluten, is it not as big of a deal if you are gluten intolerant, compared to if you had Celiac?

elle's mom Contributor

Good question Tim86, I am wondering the same thing. If a "gluten-intolerant" person cannot be detected by antibodies or endoscopy, even though they have symptoms, wouldn't it stand to reason that simply lowering the gluten intake enough to alleviate symptoms would be OK, since there isn't an actual autoimmune component harming their intestines? Does anyone know the answer to this?

ang1e0251 Contributor

I don't think there is a consensus on this question. I understood it to be the way you described when I started out but since then I have read so many opposing medical opinions that I don't know who is right. I tend to think, just my personal opinion, the GI is the starting point to further damage that can at the correct point of intestinal damage be labeled as celiac disease. And how do we know which tests are accurate or not, or interpreted correctly or not. It seems like kind of a crap shoot to me.

If I suspected I was GI, I think I would try to be concientous about the diet. Just because dr's might now say you aren't sustaining other damage, doesn't mean I believe that. After all you are experiencing strong symptoms and how can that be if there is no kind of inflammation or damage. And it wasn't that long ago that Dr's said children could be healed from celiac disease and go back to eating gluten. Many have been harmed by that advice.

jamied Newbie

i just received fibromyalgia diagnosis few months ago after 10yrs of off/on problems.

it was severe enough around Good Friday that I ultimately could not climb the stairs in my house, my bf had to carry me!!??

since the diagnosis i been doing ALOT of reading...

was my ingestion of gluten causing my inflammatory markers to be high from last October to May??

i have stopped eating 99% of all gluten (except that lil bit that gets thru the ingredient detection radar, lol)

and have had REMARKABLE results to date.

so, will i benefit frm genetic testing??

i am UNWILLING to begin consuming gluten again.

side note: i used to vomit on a daily basis for no apparent reason at all....since childhood,

after 32yrs of getting sick, i have not been nausea or vomited since going gluten-free.

crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ive had brain scans, mri, cat scans, nuclear testing etc....im thinking this is what was making me sick!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JennyC Enthusiast
Note that your tests have a number, they are not 0, maybe that means something.

Those tests are calibrated so they do not turn positive until there is a lot of gut damage. Usually it is hard or impossible to detect early celiac. Scientists have tested relatives of celiacs over a period of years, and first the antigliadin IgG tests turned positive, then the others. (that is shy doctors regard those tests for unreliable, because they can tur out positive even though the biopsy is still negative)

Only numbers above the reference range are indicative of celiac disease. The values seen within the reference ranges can frequently be seen in the healthy population, and it also gives a little "wiggle room" for slight error that may be inherent in the test or differences between technologists in their reporting.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,739
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jenn.mnc
    Newest Member
    Jenn.mnc
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • badastronaut
      Thanks so much for your replies! no danger of overdosing on the stuff? or having the other B levels going out of whack? I do take a multivitamin with all te other B vitamins at the RDA level. I have bought the HCL version of Thiamine. How long do you need to use the Thiamine? a short periode on high levels and then back to a maintenance dosage?
    • knitty kitty
      Kudos for trying thiamine! On the ingredients label it should say if it's thiamine hydrochloride (thiamine HCl) or thiamine mononitrate or something else.   Thiamine mononitrate is shelf stable and not easily utilized in the body.   Yes, go ahead and try a whole 100 mg tablet.   Take with a meal.  Don't take close to bedtime.  Tomorrow take a 100 mg tablet with two meals. The next day take two 100mg tablets at one meal and 100 mg at second meal.  Keep increasing in this manner as long as you notice improvement.   When I first started with thiamine hydrochloride, I felt like the lights in my head were being turned on floor by floor like in a tall skyscraper.  It's just the brain working properly with sufficient thiamine.  I worked up to 1000 mg a day.  Lots if tablets.  Benfotiamine and TTFD are stronger and are utilized easier, so not as many milligrams ate needed.   I'm happy to answer any further questions!  
    • lizzie42
      Hi, My 3 year old was diagnosed a couple months ago. We went gluten free, very strict, and everything improved. Energy, no more meltdowns, bad rash is mostly gone. She's doing great. Except she complains every day of stomach pain. She describes it as squeezing. Any ideas from anyone?  We cut out oats and it didn't make any difference. She doesn't drink milk, though she has cheese. It doesn't seem to coincide with the cheese. She says it hurts when she wakes and then other random times during the day.  We are SO strict with her food. We don't eat out, out whole house is gluten-free. I make everything from scratch. She eats very healthy. She's not picky and we do tons of fruit, veggies, meat, etc. we don't do a lot of processed food. 
    • badastronaut
      Ok so I couldn't find the thiamine you suggested but I was able to buy a bottle of 'standard' thiamine (100 mg). Should I just try half a tablet to see if I notice any difference? If it turns out it does have effect I can always buy the more expensive stuff. Or is that not a smart idea?
    • knitty kitty
      @cristiana, Yes, I found high carbohydrate meals would trigger mine as well.  I learned from Dr. Lonsdale that high carbohydrate diets can deplete thiamine.  Heart palpitations are a symptom of thiamine insufficiency.  Diets high in refined simple carbohydrates (empty calories) need additional Thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  The more carbs one eats, the more Thiamine is required to process the additional calories.  500 mg more Thiamine is required for every additional one thousand calories.  This is named "High Calorie Malnutrition."  Sufficient calories are being consumed, but not enough of thiamine to burn the carbs for energy.  Instead to ration out the small supply of thiamine, the additional calories are stored as fat.  It takes less thiamine to burn fat than to burn carbs.    Do read Dr. Lonsdale' article here... Hiding in Plain Sight: Modern Thiamine Deficiency https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533683/
×
×
  • Create New...